Abstract
The Einstein–Hilbert action for general relativity is not well posed in terms of the metric \(g_{ab}\) as a dynamical variable. There have been many proposals to obtain an well posed action principle for general relativity, e.g., addition of the Gibbons–Hawking–York boundary term to the Einstein–Hilbert action. These boundary terms are dependent on what one fixes on the boundary and in particular on spacetime dimensions as well. Following recent works of Padmanabhan we will introduce two new variables to describe general relativity and the action principle with these new dynamical variables will turn out to be well posed. Then we will connect these dynamical variables and boundary term obtained thereof to existing literature and shall comment on a few properties of Einstein–Hilbert action which might have been unnoticed earlier in the literature. Before concluding with future prospects and discussions, we will perform a general analysis of the boundary term of Einstein–Hilbert action for null surfaces as well.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This kind of terms are also present in the the calculation for spacelike (or timelike) surfaces, see for example the last term of Eq. (12).
References
A. Einstein, Hamilton’s principle and the general theory of relativity. Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 1916, 1111–1116 (1916)
J. Charap, J. Nelson, Surface integrals and the gravitational action. J. Phys. A: Math. General 16, 1661 (1983)
J. York, W. James, Role of conformal three geometry in the dynamics of gravitation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 1082–1085 (1972)
G. Gibbons, S. Hawking, Action integrals and partition functions in quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. D 15, 2752–2756 (1977)
J.W. York, Boundary terms in the action principles of general relativity. Found. Phys. 16(3), 249–257 (1986). doi:10.1007/BF01889475
T. Padmanabhan, A short note on the boundary term for the Hilbert action. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 29, 1450037 (2014)
K. Parattu, S. Chakraborty, B.R. Majhi, T. Padmanabhan, Null surfaces: counter-term for the action principle and the characterization of the gravitational degrees of freedom. arXiv:1501.01053 [gr-qc]
K. Parattu, B.R. Majhi, T. Padmanabhan, Structure of the gravitational action and its relation with horizon thermodynamics and emergent gravity paradigm. Phys. Rev. D 87, 124011 (2013). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.124011. arXiv:gr-qc/1303.1535 [gr-qc]
S. Chakraborty, T. Padmanabhan, Geometrical variables with direct thermodynamic significance in Lanczos-Lovelock gravity. Phys. Rev. D 90(8), 084021 (2014). arXiv:1408.4791 [gr-qc]
L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields, vol. 2, 4th edn., Course of Theoretical Physics Series (Butterworth-Heinemann, 1980)
C. Krishnan, A. Raju, A Neumann boundary term for gravity. arXiv:1605.01603 [hep-th]
R.L. Arnowitt, S. Deser, C.W. Misner, The dynamics of general relativity. arXiv:gr-qc/0405109 [gr-qc]
T. Padmanabhan, Gravitation: Foundations and Frontiers (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010)
K. Parattu, S. Chakraborty, T. Padmanabhan, Variational principle for gravity with null and non-null boundaries: a unified boundary counter-term. Eur. Phys. J. C 76(3), 129 (2016). arXiv:1602.07546 [gr-qc]
T. Padmanabhan, Gravity and the thermodynamics of horizons. Phys. Rep. 406, 49–125 (2005). arXiv:gr-qc/0311036 [gr-qc]
T. Padmanabhan, Thermodynamical aspects of gravity: new insights. Rep. Prog. Phys. 73, 046901 (2010). arXiv:0911.5004 [gr-qc]
T. Padmanabhan, Emergent gravity paradigm: recent progress. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 30(03n04), 1540007 (2015). arXiv:1410.6285 [gr-qc]
S. Chakraborty, T. Padmanabhan, Thermodynamical interpretation of the geometrical variables associated with null surfaces. Phys. Rev. D 92(10), 104011 (2015). arXiv:1508.04060 [gr-qc]
Acknowledgements
Research of S.C. is funded by a SPM fellowship from CSIR, Government of India. He thanks T. Padmanabhan for suggesting this problem and for comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. He also thanks J. Bagla and S. Engineer for invitation to write this article along with K. Parattu, S. Singh and K. Lochan for interesting discussions and comments. A part of this work was completed during a visit to ICTP, Italy and I thank ICTP for warm hospitality.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Dedication
Dedication
One of the great quality of Prof. Padmanabhan is his ability to ask the correct question. This work stems from such questions asked by him during our discussions: “What is the connection between various action principles for general relativity? Why N and \(N^{\alpha }\) are non-dynamical? What one should fix on a null surface?”. I have tried to answer them in this work and I respectfully dedicate it to Prof. Padmanabhan on the occasion of his 60th birthday.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chakraborty, S. (2017). Boundary Terms of the Einstein–Hilbert Action. In: Bagla, J., Engineer, S. (eds) Gravity and the Quantum. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 187. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51700-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51700-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51699-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51700-1
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)