Skip to main content

A Framework for Understanding the Impacts of Ridesourcing on Transportation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disrupting Mobility

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mobility ((LNMOB))

Abstract

The transportation sector is currently experiencing a monumental disruption with the introduction and evolution of technology and transportation services such as bikesharing, carsharing, on-demand ridesourcing, and microtransit. As these new layers of technology-based transportation options begin to flourish, it is important to understand how they compete and interact with more traditional modes. For example, ridesourcing theoretically takes an underutilized existing resource—empty seats in single-occupancy vehicles—and fills them with passengers. In reality, it is difficult to disentangle the interrelated short- and long-term outcomes and self-selection issues that arise from simply asking whether ridesourcing takes cars off the road or if we are siphoning from walking, bicycling, and transit modes. Beyond travel behavior, these evolving transportation services can also significantly impact our transportation systems, society, and the environment. Due to such complications, these outcomes have yet to be adequately studied. Accordingly, this book chapter provides a framework to investigate ridesourcing impacts. This, in turn, will help cities better account for the impact of technology and evolving transportation services in their planning processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shaheen, S., Guzman, S., Zhang, H.: Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2143, 159–167 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shaheen, S.A., Cohen, A.P.: Carsharing and personal vehicle services: worldwide market developments and emerging trends. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 7(1), 5–34 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goddin, P.: Redefining Uber: why the term rideshare doesn’t fit (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Warzel, C.: Let’s all join the AP stylebook in killing the term “ride-sharing” (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rayle, L., Shaheen, S., Chan, N., Dai, D., Cervero, R.: App-based, on-demand ride services: comparing taxi and ridesourcing trips and user characteristics in San Francisco, 17, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kopp, J., Gerike, R., Axhausen, K.: Do sharing people behave differently? An empirical evaluation of the distinctive mobility patterns of free-floating car-sharing members. Transportation 42(3), 449–469 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sioui, L., Morency, C., Trépanier, M.: How Carsharing Affects the Travel Behavior of Households: A Case Study of Montréal, Canada. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 7(1), 52–69 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cervero, R., Tsai, Y.: City carshare in San Francisco, California: second-year travel demand and car ownership impacts. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1887, 117–127 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin, E., Shaheen, S., Lidicker, J.: Impact of carsharing on household vehicle holdings. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2143, 150–158 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kopp, J., Gerike, R., Axhausen, K.: Status quo and perspectives for car-sharing systems: the example of drivenow. Strat. Sustain. Mobilities Opportunities Challenges 207–226 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Giddens, A.: Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford University Press (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Salomon, I., Ben-Akiva, M.: The use of the life-style concept in travel demand models. Environ. Plann. A 15(5), 623–638 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pas, E.: Weekly travel-activity behavior. Transportation 15(1–2), 89–109 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kitamura, R.: Life-style and travel demand. Transportation 36(6), 679–710 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P., Laidet, L.: A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation 24(2), 125–158 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Handy, S., Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.: Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 10(6), 427–444 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Krizek, K., Waddell, P.: Analysis of lifestyle choices: neighborhood type, travel patterns, and activity participation. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1807, 119–128 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Choo, S., Mokhtarian, P.L.: What type of vehicle do people drive? The role of attitude and lifestyle in influencing vehicle type choice. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 38(3), 201–222 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vredin Johansson, M., Heldt, T., Johansson, P.: The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 40(6), 507–525 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vij, A., Carrel, A., Walker, J.L.: Incorporating the influence of latent modal preferences on travel mode choice behavior. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 54, 164–178 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kamakura, W.A., Russell, G.J.: A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. J. Mark. Res. 26(4), 379–390 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Walker, J.L., Ben-Akiva, M.: Advances in discrete choice: mixture models. Handb Transport Econom. 160 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Salonen, M., Toivonen, T.: Modelling travel time in urban networks: comparable measures for private car and public transport. J. Transp. Geogr. 31, 143–153 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shoup, D.C.: Cruising for parking. Transp. Policy 13(6), 479–486 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Le Vine, S., Lee-Gosselin, M., Sivakumar, A., Polak, J.: A new approach to predict the market and impacts of round-trip and point-to-point carsharing systems: case study of London. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 32, 218–229 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jones, R.G.: Uber can’t really prove that it’s caused a reduction in drunk driving accidents, in Huffington Post (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vij, A., Walker, J.L.: Preference endogeneity in discrete choice models. Transp. Res. Part B Methodological 64, 90–105 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Atasoy, B., Glerum, A., Bierlaire, M.: Mode choice with attitudinal latent class: a Swiss case-study. In: 2nd international choice modelling conference, Leeds, UK (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandro Henao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Henao, A., Marshall, W. (2017). A Framework for Understanding the Impacts of Ridesourcing on Transportation . In: Meyer, G., Shaheen, S. (eds) Disrupting Mobility. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51602-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51602-8_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51601-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51602-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics