Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What Do TIMSS Studies Show About Math Achievement Inequality? A Sociological Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
What Matters? Research Trends in International Comparative Studies in Mathematics Education

Part of the book series: Research in Mathematics Education ((RME))

Abstract

With the vast progress in international comparative achievement data collection since the early 1960s, we have witnessed the rise of research that examines why primary and secondary school students in some countries perform better than students in other countries. In addition to identifying the sources of between-country gaps in average student achievement, international data projects such as the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) have paved the way for a rich body of literature that examines achievement inequality by social background. This chapter attempts to fill a gap in the research by reviewing the comparative literature that used TIMSS data to examine math achievement inequality in Japan, Korea, Singapore, and the United States over the past two decades. We focus on two types of inequality: inequality in student test scores on the basis of socioeconomic and demographic backgrounds, as measured by achievement gaps among different groups (e.g., gender, family socioeconomic status, immigrant background, and family structure), and the relative importance of school compared to family background on mathematics achievement. In this chapter, we summarize what comparative research studies say about the relationship between social backgrounds and math achievement in primary and secondary schools. Finally, we suggest possible avenues for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the toolbox: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor’s degree attainment. Washington, DC: Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allmendinger, J. (1989). Career mobility dynamics: A comparative analysis of the United States, Norway, and West Germany. Berlin: Max–Planck–Institut für Bildungsforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M., & Thomas, R. M. (1995). Levels of comparison in educational studies: Different insights from different literature and the value of multilevel analyses. Harvard Education Review, 65(3), 472–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, M., & Namgi, P. (2009). Education inequality in the Republic of Korea: Measurement and causes. In D. B. Holsinger & W. J. Jacob (Eds.), Inequality in education: Comparative and international perspective (Vol. 24, pp. 261–289). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camburn, E. M., & Han, S. W. (2009). Two decades of generalizable evidence on U.S. instruction from national surveys. Teachers College Record, 113(3), 561–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, M., & Rothstein, R. (2013). What do international tests really show about U.S. student performance? Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, M. M. (2005). Effects of resources, inequality, and privilege bias on achievement: Country, school, and student level analyses. American Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 575–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects of inequality, family and school on mathematics achievement. Social Forces, 88(4), 1645–1676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamoran, A., & Long, D. A. (2008). Equality of educational opportunity: A 40 year perspective. In R. Teese, S. Lamb, & M. Duru-Bellats (Eds.), Education and equity. International perspectives on theory and policy (Vol. 1, pp. 23–47). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., Monte, F., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Culture, gender, and math. Science, 320(5880), 1164–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A., & Yilmaz, K. (2011). Urban education: Location and opportunity in the United States. In N. Brooks, K. Donaghy, & G.-J. Knaap (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of urban economics and planning (pp. 583–615). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyneman, S. P. (1976). A brief note on the relationship between socioeconomic status and test performance among Ugandan primary school children. Comparative Education Review, 20, 42–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyneman, S. P., & Loxley, W. A. (1983). The effects of primary school quality on academic achievement across twenty-nine high and low income countries. American Journal of Sociology, 88, 1162–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerckhoff, A. C. (1995). Institutional arrangements and stratification processes in industrial societies. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 323–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerckhoff, A. C. (2001). Education and social stratification processes in comparative perspective. Sociology of Education, 74, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E., & Han, Y. (2002). Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers: Background report for Korea. Seoul, Korea: Korean Educational Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knipprath, H. (2010). What PISA tells about the quality and inequality of Japanese education in mathematics and science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 389–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levels, M., Dronkders, J., & Kraaykamp, G. (2008). Immigrant children’s educational achievement in western countries: Origin, destination, and community effects on mathematical performance. American Sociological Review, 73, 835–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G. N., Cresswell, J., & Ainley, J. (2006). Explaining socioeconomic inequalities in student achievement: The role of home and school factors. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(2), 105–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2003). Understanding others, educating ourselves: Getting more from international comparative studies in education. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohinata, A., & van Ours, J. C. (2012). Young immigrant children and their educational attainment, IZA discussion paper. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2004). Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers: Background report for Australia. Retrieved April 21, 2010 from OECD http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/63/50/3879121.pdf.

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Kim, J.-S. (2002). Statistical issues in analysis of international comparison of educational achievement. In A. C. Porter & A. Gamoran (Eds.), Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement (pp. 267–294). Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscigno, V. J., Tomaskovic-Devey, D., & Crowley, M. (2006). Social forces. Education and the Inequalities of Place, 84(4), 2121–2145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W. H., Burroughs, N. A., Zoido, P., & Houang, R. T. (2015). The role of schooling in perpetuating educational inequality: An international perspective. Educational Researcher, 44(7), 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Houang, R. T., Wang, H. C., Wiley, D. E., Cogan, L. S., et al. (2001). Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison of curriculum and learning, The Jossey-Bass education series. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Werfhorst, H. G., & Mijs, J. B. (2010). Achievement inequality and the institutional structure of educational systems: A comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 407–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wӧβmann, L. (2002). Central examinations improve educational performance: International evidence, Kiel discussion papers 397. Kiel: Institute for World Economics.

    Google Scholar 

Appendix: Research Articles Reviewed

  • Akiba, M., LeTendre, G. K., & Scribner, J. P. (2007). Teacher quality, opportunity gap, and national achievement in 46 countries. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andon, A., Thompson, C. G., & Becker, B. J. (2014). A quantitative synthesis of the immigrant achievement gap across OECD countries. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 2(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalon, H., & Livneh, I. (2013). Educational standardization and gender differences in mathematics achievement: A comparative study. Social Science Research, 42(2), 432–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. P., Goesling, B., & LeTendre, G. K. (2002). Socioeconomic status, school quality, and national economic development: A cross-national analysis of the “Heyneman-Loxley Effect” on mathematics and science achievement. Comparative Education Review, 46(3), 291–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byun, S. Y., & Kim, K. K. (2010). Educational inequality in South Korea: The widening socioeconomic gap in student achievement. Research in Sociology of Education, 17, 155–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Q. (2014). Using TIMSS 2007 Data to build mathematics achievement model of fourth graders in Hong Kong and Singapore. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 1519–1545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Q., Wang, J., Hao, S., & Shi, Q. (2014). Mathematics performance of immigrant students across different racial groups: An indirect examination of the influence of culture and schooling. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 15(4), 589–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chudgar, A., & Luschei, T. F. (2009). National income, income inequality, and the importance of schools: A hierarchical cross-national comparison. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 626–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A., & Luque, J. A. (2003). Efficiency and equity in schools around the world. Economics of Education Review, 22(5), 481–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S., & Fullarton, S. (2002). Classroom and school factors affecting mathematics achievement: A comparative study of Australia and the United States using TIMSS. Australian Journal of Education, 46(2), 154–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuschmidt, O., Barth, J., & Hastedt, D. (2008). Trends in gender differences in mathematics and science (TIMSS 1995–2003). Studies in Educational Evaluation, 34(2), 56–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., et al. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10593–10597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahlke, E., Hyde, J. S., & Mertz, J. E. (2013). The effects of single-sex compared with coeducational schooling on mathematics and science achievement: Data from Korea. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penner, A. (2008). Gender differences in extreme mathematical achievement: An international perspective of biological and social forces. American Journal of Sociology, 114, S138–S170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pong, S. L., & Pallas, A. (2001). Class size and eighth-grade math achievement in the United States and abroad. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(3), 251–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pong, S. L., Dronkers, J., & Hampden-Thompson, G. (2003). Family policies and children’s school achievement in single- versus two-parent families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(3), 681–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, K. S., Khmelkov, V. T., & Wang, X. Q. (2002). Economic development and the effects of family characteristics on mathematics achievement. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(3), 730–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnepf, S. V. (2007). Immigrants’ educational disadvantage: An examination across ten countries and three surveys. Journal of Population Economics, 20(3), 527–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldfogel, J., & Zhai, F. (2008). Effects of public preschool expenditures on the test scores of fourth graders: Evidence from TIMSS. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(1), 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D. B. (2004). Family background factors and mathematics success: A comparison of Chinese and US students. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(1), 40–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Osterlind, S. J., & Bergin, D. A. (2012). Building mathematics achievement models in four countries using TIMSS 2003. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(5), 1215–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshino, A. (2012). The relationship between self-concept and achievement in TIMSS 2007: A comparison between American and Japanese students. International Review of Education, 58(2), 199–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Leadership and Policy, University at Buffalo – The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA

    Seong Won Han & Chungseo Kang

  2. Department of Learning and Instruction, University at Buffalo – The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA

    Ji-Won Son

Authors
  1. Seong Won Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ji-Won Son
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chungseo Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seong Won Han .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Learning and Instruction, University at Buffalo–The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA

    Ji-Won Son

  2. Department of Mathematics, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia, USA

    Tad Watanabe

  3. Department of Mathematics, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA

    Jane-Jane Lo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Han, S.W., Son, JW., Kang, C. (2017). What Do TIMSS Studies Show About Math Achievement Inequality? A Sociological Perspective. In: Son, JW., Watanabe, T., Lo, JJ. (eds) What Matters? Research Trends in International Comparative Studies in Mathematics Education. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51187-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51187-0_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51185-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51187-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation