Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Indicators Research and Health-Related Quality of Life Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Connecting the Quality of Life Theory to Health, Well-being and Education

Abstract

The aim of this essay is to build a bridge between two intersecting areas of research, social indicators research on the one hand and health-related quality of life research on the other. The first substantive section of the paper introduces key concepts and definitions in the social indicators research tradition, e.g., social indicators, positive, negative, input and output indicators, social reports and quality of life. After that, there is a section reviewing some historical origins and motives of social indicators researchers, beginning roughly with Jeremy Bentham’s ‘felicific calculus’ and ending with the search for a comprehensive accounting scheme capable of measuring the quality of human existence with social, economic and environmental indicators. Results of eleven surveys are reviewed which were undertaken to explain happiness on the basis of levels of satisfaction that respondents got from a dozen specific domains of their lives, e.g., satisfaction with their jobs, family relations and health. On average, for the eleven samples, we were able to explain 38% of the variance in reported happiness from some subset of the predictor variables. Satisfaction with one’s own health was never the strongest predictor of happiness in any sample. In five of the eleven samples, satisfaction with one’s own health failed to enter the final explanatory regression equation for lack of statistical significance. The results in this section of the essay show that different groups of people with different life circumstances, resources and constraints use different mixtures of ingredients to determine their happiness. After examining some research revealing the relative importance of people’s satisfaction with their health to their overall happiness, I consider some studies revealing the importance of people’s self-reported health to their overall happiness. Self-reported health is measured primarily by the eight dimensions of SF-36. When a variety of additional potential predictors are entered into our regression equation, 44% of the variance in happiness scores is explained, but only one of the eight dimensions of SF-36 remains, namely, Mental Health. The latter accounts for a mere four percentage points out of the total 44. Thus, self-reported health has relatively little to contribute toward respondents’ reported happiness, and its measured contribution is significantly affected by the number and kinds of potential predictors employed. Two approaches to explaining people’s satisfaction with their own health are considered. First, using the same set of health-related potential predictors of overall happiness, we are able to explain 56% of the variance in respondents’ satisfaction with their own health. Then, using Multiple Discrepancies Theory, we are able to explain about 51% of the variation in satisfaction with one’s own health scores for 8,076 undergraduates, with highs of 76% for a sample of Finnish females and 72% for Korean males. Accordingly, it is reasonable to conclude that if one’s aim is to explain people’s satisfaction with their own health, the potential predictors assembled in MDT can provide quite a bit and sometimes even more explanatory power than a reasonably broad set of measures of self-reported health. In the penultimate section of the essay it is argued that there are good reasons for carefully distinguishing ideas of health and quality of life, and for not interpreting SF-36 and SIP scores as measures of the quality of life. It is suggested that we might all be better off if the term ‘health- related quality of life’ is simply abandoned. However, since this is unlikely to happen, it is strongly recommended that researchers be much more careful with their usage of the phrase and their interpretation of purported measures of whatever the phrase is supposed to designate.

This essay was written for presentation at an invited plenary session of the annual meeting of the International Society for Quality of Life Research held in Amsterdam, 7–10 November 2001. The original plan was to give special attention to research on happiness, but the focus became broader as the story unfolded.

Michalos, A.C.: 2004. Social indicators research and health-related quality of life research. Social Indicators Research, 65, pp. 27–72. © 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allardt, E. (1975). Att ha, alska, attvara. Om valfard i Norden [Having, Loving, Being. On Welfare in the Nordic Countries]. Borgholm: Argos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andorka, R., & Harcsa, I. (1990). Modernization in Hungary in the long and short run measured by social indicators. Social Indicators Research, 23, 1–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, E. M., Fouts, B. S., Romeis, J. C., & Brownson, C. A. (1999). Performance of health-related quality-of-life instruments in a spinal cord injured population. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 877–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, E. M., Rothenberg, B. M., & Kaplan, R. M. (1998). Performance of a self-administered mailed version of the Quality of Well-Being (QWB-SA) questionnaire among older adults. Medical Care, 36(9), 1349–1360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F. M. (1974). Social indicators of perceived life quality. Social Indicators Research, 1, 279–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F.M. (1984). Construct validity and error components of survey measures: A structural modeling approach. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 409–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (1987). The psychology of happiness. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardsley, M. J., Astell, S., McCallum, A., & Home, P. D. (1993). The performance of three measures of health status in an outpatient diabetes population. Diabetic Medicine, 10, 619–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (1789). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergner, M. (1993). Development, testing and use of the sickness impact profile. In S. R. Walker & R. M. Rosser (Eds.), Quality of life assessment: Key issues in the 1990s (pp. 95–110). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R. A., Carter, W. B., & Gilson, B. S. (1981). The sickness impact profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure. Medical Care, 19(8), 787–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbacher, D. (1999). Quality of life—Evaluation or description. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2(1), 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, N. M., & Caplovitz, D. (1965). Reports of happiness. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braybrooke, D. (1967). Skepticism of wants, and certain subversive effects of corporations on American values. In S. Hook (Ed.), Human values and economic policy (pp. 224–239). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunk, C. (1987). Professionalism and responsibility in the technological society. In D. C. Poff & W. J. Waluchow (Eds.), Business ethics in canada (pp. 60–75). Toronto: Prentice-Hall Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1961). The weight of simplicity in the construction and assaying of scientific theories. Philosophy of Science, 28, 120–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cella, D. F., et al. (1993). The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11(3), 570–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, D. N., Morgan, J., & Torrance, G. W. (1984). Quality of life in end-state renal disease. Peritoneal Dialysis Bulletin, 4, 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin, A. F., de Witte, L. P., Stevens, F., & Diederiks, J. P. M. (1992). Sickness impact profile: The state of the art of a generic functional status measure. Social Science and Medicine, 35(8), 1003–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1939). Theory of valuation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. (1988). Reliability and validity of a diabetes quality-of-life measure for the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care, 11(9), 725–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2000). Explaining differences in societal levels of happiness: Relative standards, need fulfillment, culture and evaluation theory. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 41–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiser, C., & Tooke, J. E. (1993). Quality-of-life evaluation in diabetes. PharmacoEconomics, 4(2), 85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbank, J. C. T., et al. (1980). The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy, 66, 271–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferriss, A. (1990). Whatever happened, indeed! Journal of Public Policy, 9, 401–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, A. E., Hunt, B. M., & Bulpitt, C. J. (1987). Evaluation of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular disease. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40(6), 557–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, K. A. (1985). Social system accounts: Linking social and economic indicators through tangible behavior settings. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guyatt, G. H., Townsend, M., Berman, L. B., & Pugsley, S. O. (1987). Quality of life in patients with chronic airflow limitation. British Journal of Diseases of the Chest, 81, 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyatt, G. H., Veldhuyzen Van Zanten, S. J. O., Feeny, D. H., & Patrick, D. L. (1989). Measuring quality of life in clinical trials: A taxonomy and review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 140, 1441–1448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M. R., et al. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and agenda for research. Social Indicators Research, 55, 1–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanestad, B. R. (1990). Errors of measurement affecting the reliability and validity of data acquired from self-assessed quality of life. Scandanavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(1), 29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornquist, J. O. (1989). Quality of life: Concept and assessment. Scandanavian Journal of Social Medicine, 18, 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997). Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38, 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, G. M., & Marrero, D. G. (1991). A modified quality-of-life measure for youths: Psychometric properties. The Diabetes Educator, 17(2), 114–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, A. M., de Groot, M., & Samson, J. A. (1994). The evaluation of two measures of quality oflife in patients with type I and type II diabetes. Diabetes Care, 17(4), 267–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1909). The meaning of truth: A sequel to pragmatism. New York: Longmans Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1977). (originally published 1891), The moral philosopher and the moral life. In J. J. McDermott (Ed.), The writings of William James: A comprehensive edition (pp. 610–629). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juster, F. T., & Land, K. C. (1981). Social accounting systems: Essays on the state of the art. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl, B. D., & Charles, E. (1974). Merriam and the study of politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, K. (1983). Social indicators. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • League For Social Reconstruction Research Committee. (1935). Social planning for Canada. Toronto: Thomas Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. I. (1946). Analysis of knowledge and valuation. LaSalle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacRae, D. (1985). Policy indicators: Links between social science and public debate. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, I., & Newell, C. (1996). Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, I., & Praught, E. (1982). On the measurement of happiness: An examination of the Bradburn scale in the Canada health survey. American Journal of Epidemiology, 116(6), 949–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McSweeny, A. J., et al. (1982). Life quality of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Archives of Internal Medicine, 142, 473–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1967). Postulates of rational preference. Philosophy of Science, 34, 18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1969). Principles of Logic. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1970a). Decision making in committees. American Philosophical Quarterly, 7, 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1970b). Cost-benefit versus expected utility acceptance rules. Theory and Decision, 1, 61–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1970c). The impossibility of an ordinal measure of acceptability. Philosophical Forum, 2, 103–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1970d). The costs of decision making. Public Choice, 9, 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1978). Foundations of decision-making. Ottawa: Canadian Library of Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1979). The loyal agent’s argument. In T. Beauchamp & N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business (pp. 247–253). Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs. (Reprinted in Michalos 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1980). North American social report, Vol. 1: Foundations, population and health. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1981). Technology assessment, facts and values. In P.T. Durbin (Ed.), Research in Philosophy and Technology (Vol.4, pp. 59–81). Dordrecht: JAI press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1985). Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). Social Indicators Research, 16, 347–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1988). Integrated development planning using socio-economic and quality of life indicators. In Innovative approaches to development planning (pp. 113–216). Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1990). The impact of trust on business, international security and the quality of life. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 619–638. (Reprinted in Michalos 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1991a). Global report on student well-being, Vol. 1: Life satisfaction and happiness. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1991b). Global report on student well-being, Vol. 2: Family, friends, living partner and self-esteem. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1992). Ethical considerations in evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 7, 61–75. (Reprinted in Michalos 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1993a). Global Report on Student Well-Being, Vol. 3: Employment, Finances, Housing and Transportation. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1993b). Global Report on Student Well-Being, Vol. 4: Religion, Education, Recreation and Health. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1995). A pragmatic approach to business ethics. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1997). Combining social, economic and environmental indicators to measure sustainable human well-being. Social Indicators Research, 40, 221–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1999). Reflections on twenty-five years of quality-of-life research. Feminist Economics, 5(2), 119–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (2001). Ethics counselors as a new priesthood. Journal of Business Ethics, 29, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C., A. Hubley, B., Zumbo, D., & Hemingway, D. (2001). Health and other aspects of the quality of life of older people. Social Indicators Research, 54(1), xxx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C., & Zumbo, B. D. (1999). Public services and the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 48, 125–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C., & Zumbo, B. D. (2001). Ethnicity, modern prejudice and the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 53, 189–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C., & Zumbo, B. D. (2003). Leisure activities, health and the quality of life. In A.C. Michalos (Ed.) Essays on the Quality of Life (pp. 217–238). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C., Zumbo, B. D., & Hubley, A. (2000). Health and the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 51, 245–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. C. (1918). Bentham’s felicific calculus. Political Science Quarterly, 33, 161–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najman, J. M., & Levine, S. (1981). Evaluating the impact of medical care and technologies on the quality of life: A review and critique. Social Science and Medicine, 15F, 107–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerenz, D. R., Repasky, D. P., Whitehouse, F. W., & Kahkonen, D. M. (1992). Ongoing assessment of health status in patients with diabetes mellitus. Medical Care, 30(5), MS112–MS124. (Supplement).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll, H.-H., & Zapf, W. (1994). Social indicators research: Societal monitoring and social reporting. In I. Borg & P. P. Mohler (Eds.), Trends and perspectives in empirical social research. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nord, E., Arnesen, T., Menzel, P., & Pinto, Jose-Luis. (2001). Towards a more restricted use of the term “quality of life”. Quality of Life Newsletter, 26, 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C., & Sen, A. (Eds.). (1993). The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, D. L., & Deyo, R. A. (1989). Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality oflife. Medical Care, 27(3), s217–s232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R. B. (1926). General theory of value. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R. B. (1954). Realms of value. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pilowsky, I., et al. (1983). The illness behavior assessment schedule: Reliability and validity. International Journal of Psychiatry and Medicine, 13, 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff, D. C. (1987). The loyal agent’s argument revisited. In D. C. Poff & W. J. Waluchow (Eds.), Business ethics in Canada (pp. 142–144). Toronto: Prentice-Hall Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • President’s Research Committee on Social Trends. (1933). Recent social trends in the United States (Vols. 1, 2). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigatano, G. P., Wright, E. C., & Levin, D. (1984). Quality of life and its predictors in patients with mild hypoxemia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Archives of Internal Medicine, 144, 1613–1619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report deporession scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, R., & Brown, I. (1996). The centre for health promotion’s conceptual approach to quality of life. In R. Renwick, I. Brown, & M. Nagler (Eds.), Quality of life in health promotion and rehabilitation: Conceptual approaches, issues and applications (pp. 75–86). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandvik, E., Diener, E., & Seidlitz, L. (1993). Subjective well-being: The convergence and stability of self-report and non-self-report measures. Journal of Personality, 61, 317–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilpp, P. A. (Ed.). (1963). The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. LaSalle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, H., et al. (1984). Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: The functional living index—Cancer: Development and validation. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2, 472–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1992). Constructing reality and its alternatives: Assimilation and contrast effects. In L. L. Marting & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgment (pp. 217–245). Erlbaum: Hillsdale, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1991). Evaluating one’s life: A judgment model of subjective well-being. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 27–47). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 61–84). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, J. (in press). Handbook of quality-of-life research: An ethical marketing perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, E. (1980). Consultation of research network on the quality of life, Division for socio-economic analysis. UNESCO, Paris, 3–5 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprangers, M. A. G. (1996). Response-shift bias: A challenge to the assessment of patients’ quality of life in cancer clinical trials. Cancer Treatment Reviews, 22(Supplement A), 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprangers, M. A. G., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 1507–1515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatarkiewicz, W. (1976). Analysis of happiness. Hague: M. Nijhoff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D.R., Hughes, E., & Zumbo, B.D. (1998). On variable importance in linear regression. Social Indicators Research, 45, 253–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, G. W. (1986). Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. Journal of Health Economics, 5, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of happiness. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R., & Ouweneel, P. (1995). Livability of the welfare-state, appreciation-of-life and length-of-life in nations varying in state-welfare-effort. Social Indicators Research, 36, 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbrugge, L. M., Merrill, S. S., & Liu, X. (1999). Measuring disability with parsimony. Disability and Rehabilitation, 21(5/6), 295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, J. (1994). Social indicators and social reporting. Statistical Journal of the United Nations ECE, 11, 241–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (1993). SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada

    Alex C. Michalos

Authors
  1. Alex C. Michalos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex C. Michalos .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Michalos, A.C. (2017). Social Indicators Research and Health-Related Quality of Life Research. In: Connecting the Quality of Life Theory to Health, Well-being and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51161-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51161-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51160-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51161-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation