Skip to main content

Challenging Maxillary Anterior Implant-Supported Restorations: Creating Predictable Outcomes with Zirconia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Implant Aesthetics

Abstract

The restoration of form and function with dental implants often presents challenges to the most experienced clinician. Each case category has requirements, whether it is a single tooth or a complete arch in need of restoration. The anterior zone, especially the maxilla, can present issues beyond our traditional knowledge of tooth-supported restorations. The high lip line accompanied by irregular bone loss patterns has challenged the practice of implant dentistry since the inception of reliable osseointegrated implants. In the ensuing years, the advancement of implant technology along with regenerative technologies has provided the backbone of improving treatment outcomes. Developments such as 3D radiography, advanced treatment planning software and high-performance ceramics have opened new possibilities in treatment objectives and greater understanding of the requirements for successful management of the complex anterior aesthetic zone. This chapter will explore a series of cases from the single tooth to multi-unit restorations in both the maxilla and mandibular zones. Explanation of the differential treatment choices and subsequent restorative results will be presented along with pertinent supporting evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M (2010) Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 37:641–652

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alghazzawi TF, Lemons J, Liu PR, Essig ME, Bartolucci AA, Janowski GM (2012) Influence of low-temperature environmental exposure on the mechanical properties and structural stability of dental zirconia. J Prosthodont 21:363–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alqahtani F. Full-mouth rehabilitation of severely worn dentition due to soda swishing: A clinical report. J Prosthodont 2013;23:50–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barewal R, Stanford C, Weesner T (2012) A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the effects of three loading protocols on dental implant stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27:945–956

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cassetta M, Stefanelli L, Giansanti M, Di Mambro A, Calasso S (2013) Accuracy of a computer-aided implant surgical technique. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 33(3):316–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier J, Gremillard L (2009) The tetragonal-monoclinic transformation in zirconia: lessons learned and future trends. J Am Ceram Soc 92:1901–1920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho S, Schaefer O, Thompson G, Guentsch A (2015) Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 113:310–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen GJ (2012) Indirect restoration use: a changing paradigm. J Am Dent Assoc 143:398–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen M (ed) (2008) Interdisciplinary treatment planning: principles, design, implementation, 1st edn. Quintessence, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ (2007) Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 98:389–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dym H (2015) Implant procedures for the general dentist. Dent Clin 53(2):255–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Flinn BD, deGroot DA, Mancl LA, Raigrodski AJ (2012) Accelerated aging characteristics of three yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline dental materials. J Prosthet Dent 108:223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gökçen-Röhlig B, Saruhanoglu A, Cifter ED, Evlioglu G (2010) Applicability of zirconia dental prostheses for metal allergy patients. Int J Prosthodont 23:562–565

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodacre C, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan J (2003) Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 90(2):121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guess PC, Att W, Strub JR (2012) Zirconia in fixed implant prosthodontics. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 14:633–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güth JF, Almeida E, Silva JS, Beuer FF, Edelhoff D (2012) Enhancing the predictability of complex rehabilitation with a removable CAD/CAM-fabricated long-term provisional prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 107:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris D, Horner K, Gröndahl K, Jacobs R, Helmrot E, Benic G, Bornstein M, Dawood A, Quirynen MEAO (2012) Guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry 2011. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration at the Medical University of Warsaw. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:1243–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hisbergues M, Vendeville S, Vendeville P (2009) Zirconia: established facts and perspectives for a biomaterial in dental implantology. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 88:519–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janyavula S, Lawson N, Cakir D, Beck P, Ramp LC, Burgess JO (2013) The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel. J Prosthet Dent 109:22–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jokstad A, Braegger U, Brunski JB, Carr AB, Naert I, Wennerberg A (2004) Quality of dental implants. Int J Prosthodont 17(6):607–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung YS, Lee JW, Choi YJ, Ahn JS, Shin SW, Huh JB (2010) A study on the in-vitro wear of the natural tooth structure by opposing zirconia or dental porcelain. J Adv Prosthodont 2:111–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapos T, Evans C (2014) CAD/CAM technology for implant abutments, crowns, and superstructures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29(suppl 1):117–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karl M, Graef F, Wichmann M, Krafft T (2012) Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 107:232–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JR, Denry I (2008) Stabilized zirconia as a structural ceramic: an overview. Dent Mater 24:289–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keren H, Caro S. Das beste material. Dent Lab. 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Klasser GD, Greene CS, Lavigne GJ (2010) Oral appliances and the management of sleep bruxism in adults: a century of clinical applications and search for mechanisms. Int J Prosthodont 23:453–462

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ko N, Mine A, Egusa H, Shimazu T, Ko R, Nakano T, Yatani H (2014) Allergic reaction to titanium-made fixed dental restorations: a clinical report. J Prosthodont:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang N, Berglundh T, Heitz-Mayfield L, Pjetursson B, Salvi G, Sanz M (2004) Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding implant survival and complications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19:150–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson C, Wennerberg A (2014) The clinical success of zirconia-based crowns: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 27:33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moráguez OD, Belser UC (2010) The use of polytetrafluoroethylene tape for the management of screw access channels in implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 103:189–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moscovitch MS (2015a) Monolithic zirconia fixed prostheses. In: Beumer J, Faulkner R, Shah C, Moy P (eds) Fundamentals of implant dentistry, volume 1: prosthodontic principles. Quintessence Books, Hanover Park, pp 94–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovitch MS (2015b) A complex implant-supported reconstruction with monolithic-minimally veneered zirconia: a clinical report. Compendium 36(7):496–502

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moscovitch MS (2015c) Consecutive case series of monolithic and minimally veneered zirconia restorations on teeth and implants: up to 68 months. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 35(3):315–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moscovitch MS, Saba S (1996) The use of a provisional restoration in implant dentistry: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 11:395–399

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozkurt Z, KazazoÄŸlu E (2010) Clinical success of zirconia in dental applications. J Prosthodont 19(1):64–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park JH, Park S, Lee K, Yun KD, Lim HP (2014) Antagonist wear of three CAD/CAM anatomic contour zirconia ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 111:20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pjetursson B, Thoma D, Jung R, Zwahlen M, Zembic A (2012) A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 23(6):22–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raigrodski AJ, Hillstead MB, Meng GK, Chung KH (2012) Survival and complications of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 107:170–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes A, Turkyilmaz I, Prihoda TJ (2015) Accuracy of surgical guides made from conventional and a combination of digital scanning and rapid prototyping techniques. J Prosthet Dent 113(4):295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas-Vizcaya F (2011) Full zirconia fixed detachable implant-retained restorations manufactured from monolithic zirconia: clinical report after two years in service. J Prosthodont 20:570–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagirkaya E, Arikan S, Sadik B, Kara C, Karasoy D, Cehreli M (2012) A randomized, prospective, open-ended clinical trial of zirconia fixed partial dentures on teeth and implants: interim results. Int J Prosthodont 25:221–231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter M, Boemicke W, Stober T (2014) Bruxism in prospective studies of veneered zirconia restorations: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 27:127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thalji GN, Cooper LF (2014) Implant-supported fixed dental rehabilitation with monolithic zirconia: a clinical case report. J Esthet Restor Dent 26:88–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton TR (2014) Making sense of complication reporting associated with fixed dental prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 27:114–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wismeijer D, Brägger U, Evans C, Kapos T, Kelly JR, Millen C, Wittneben JG, Zembic A, Taylor TD (2014) Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding restorative materials and techniques for implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29:137–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood M, Vermilyea S (2004) A review of selected dental literature on evidence-based treatment planning for dental implants: report of the committee on research in fixed prosthodontics of the academy of fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 92(5):447–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Hiam Keren, MDT, for the laboratory support in the production of the restorations and Danae Sandoval for the technical assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. The author reported no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Moscovitch DDS, (Prosthodontist) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moscovitch, M. (2017). Challenging Maxillary Anterior Implant-Supported Restorations: Creating Predictable Outcomes with Zirconia. In: Karateew, E. (eds) Implant Aesthetics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50706-4_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50706-4_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50704-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50706-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics