Skip to main content

Perception, Attitudes, Intentions, Decisions and Actual Behavior

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Consumer Perception of Product Risks and Benefits

Abstract

This chapter discusses how linear models that assume a causal link from perception, to attitude, to intention and decisions and finally behavior have long dominated consumer behavior research. The theory of planned behavior, the technology acceptance model and the norm activation model are examples of such linear models. These models have in common that consumers are assumed to perceive a product and based on product properties create a summary evaluation whether the product is positive or negative to them. Such an evaluation is labelled an attitude; a construct which holds a central place in the most important of these models. In spite of the broad use of attitudes in consumer research, there is remarkably little agreement on what an attitude actually is. Debate continues to what extent attitudes are cognitive/rational or emotional, to what extent they are stored or recreated every time, whether they are conscious, or unconscious. In addition, the attitude behavior link explains only a limited part of the variation in actual consumer behavior. This suggests that current models miss out on important predictors or are used outside their scope. Alternative explanations, methodological problems and theory development on attitude are needed to provide future improvements. Nevertheless we can use the current models, but we need to be careful and conscious about their limitations when doing so.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2000). The automatic activation of goal-directed behaviour: The case of travel habit. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(1), 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2000). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 8(4), 244–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, S., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bredahl, L. (2001). Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified foods—results of a cross-national survey. Journal of Consumer Policy, 24(1), 23–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G. A. J. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing, 16, 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B. (2006). Influence: The psychology of persuasion (Revised ed.). New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clore, G. L., & Schnall, S. (2005). The influences of affect on attitude. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes (pp. 437–490). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrey, F. R., Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., Hugenberg, K., & Groom, C. J. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: the quad model of implicit task performance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 89(4), 469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crano, W. D., & Prislin, R. (2006). Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 345–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dismukes, R. K. (2012). Prospective memory in workplace and everyday situations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(4), 215–220. doi:10.1177/0963721412447621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion, 15(2), 115–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25(5), 603–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frewer, L. J, Fischer, A. R. H, van den Brink, P. J., Byrne, P., Brock, T., Brown, C., Crocker, J., Goerlitz, G., Hart, A., Scholderer, J., & Solomon, K. (2008) Potential for the adaptation of probabilistic risk assessments by end-users and decision–makers. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 14, 166–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2011). The associative-propositional evaluation model. Theory, evidence, and open questions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 59–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glöckner, A., & Witteman, C. (2010). Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making. Thinking and Reasoning, 16(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, C. E. (2011). An overview of implicit measures of attitudes: Methods, mechanisms, strengths, and limitations. Communication Methods and Measures, 5(3), 203–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(6), 1464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-Analysis of Predictive Validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1369–1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, R. W., Verplanken, B., & Van Knippenberg, A. (2002). On the nature of attitude-behavior relations: The strong guide, the weak follow. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(6), 869–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hübner, G., & Kaiser, F. G. (2006). The moderating role of the attitude-subjective norms conflict on the link between moral norms and intention. European Psychologist, 11(2), 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, K., Broemer, P., & Diehl, M. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 35–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F. G., Woelfing, S., & Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F. G., Schultz, P. W., & Scheuthle, H. (2007). The theory of planned behavior without compatibility? Beyond method bias and past trivial associations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(7), 1522–1544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krosnick, J. A., Boninger, D. S., Chuang, Y. C., Berent, M. K., & Carnot, C. G. (1993). Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(9), 1132–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebel, E. P., & Paunonen, S. V. (2011). Sexy but often unreliable: The impact of unreliability on the replicability of experimental findings with implicit measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(4), 570–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. J., Scheufele, D. A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2005). Public attitudes toward emerging technologies: Examining the interactive effects of cognitions and affect on public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Science Communication, 27(2), 240–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordgren, L. F., van Harreveld, F., & van der Pligt, J. (2006). Ambivalence, discomfort, and motivated information processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 252–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 54–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D. (2009). Identity-based motivation: Implications for action-readiness, procedural-readiness, and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 250–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reinders, M. J., van der Lans, I. A., Fischer, A. R. H., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2013) A review to collate information on external communication as a basis of innovation success. Connect4Action Deliverable. Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronteltap, A., van Trijp, J. C. M., Renes, R. J., & Frewer, L. J. (2007). Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations: Lessons for the future of nutrigenomics. Appetite, 49(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, T., & Conner, M. (2008). Anticipated regret as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(4), 589–606. doi:10.1348/014466607x258704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1996). Attitude strength and the concept of crystallization. In H. Schuman & S. Presser (Eds.), Questions and answers in attitude surveys; experiments on question form, wording, and context (pp. 251–273). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (2007). Attitude construction: Evaluation in context. Social Cognition, 25(5), 638–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2002). What doesn’t kill me makes me stronger: The effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1298–1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. doi:10.1037/a0018963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Giesen, R. I., Fischer, A. R. H., Van Dijk, H., & Van Trijp, H. C. M. (2015). Affect and cognition in attitude formation toward familiar and unfamiliar attitude objects. PLoS ONE, 10(10). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141790.

  • Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly Management Information Systems, 36(1), 157–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude—Behavioral intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(2), 169–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnout R. H. Fischer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fischer, A.R.H. (2017). Perception, Attitudes, Intentions, Decisions and Actual Behavior. In: Emilien, G., Weitkunat, R., Lüdicke, F. (eds) Consumer Perception of Product Risks and Benefits. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50530-5_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics