Abstract
This chapter discusses how linear models that assume a causal link from perception, to attitude, to intention and decisions and finally behavior have long dominated consumer behavior research. The theory of planned behavior, the technology acceptance model and the norm activation model are examples of such linear models. These models have in common that consumers are assumed to perceive a product and based on product properties create a summary evaluation whether the product is positive or negative to them. Such an evaluation is labelled an attitude; a construct which holds a central place in the most important of these models. In spite of the broad use of attitudes in consumer research, there is remarkably little agreement on what an attitude actually is. Debate continues to what extent attitudes are cognitive/rational or emotional, to what extent they are stored or recreated every time, whether they are conscious, or unconscious. In addition, the attitude behavior link explains only a limited part of the variation in actual consumer behavior. This suggests that current models miss out on important predictors or are used outside their scope. Alternative explanations, methodological problems and theory development on attitude are needed to provide future improvements. Nevertheless we can use the current models, but we need to be careful and conscious about their limitations when doing so.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2000). The automatic activation of goal-directed behaviour: The case of travel habit. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(1), 75–82.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2000). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.
Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 8(4), 244–254.
Bamberg, S., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 175–187.
Bredahl, L. (2001). Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified foods—results of a cross-national survey. Journal of Consumer Policy, 24(1), 23–61.
Churchill, G. A. J. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing, 16, 64–73.
Cialdini, R. B. (2006). Influence: The psychology of persuasion (Revised ed.). New York: Harper Business.
Clore, G. L., & Schnall, S. (2005). The influences of affect on attitude. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes (pp. 437–490). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Conrey, F. R., Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., Hugenberg, K., & Groom, C. J. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: the quad model of implicit task performance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 89(4), 469.
Crano, W. D., & Prislin, R. (2006). Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 345–374.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Dismukes, R. K. (2012). Prospective memory in workplace and everyday situations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(4), 215–220. doi:10.1177/0963721412447621.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Fazio, R. H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion, 15(2), 115–141.
Fazio, R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25(5), 603–637.
Frewer, L. J, Fischer, A. R. H, van den Brink, P. J., Byrne, P., Brock, T., Brown, C., Crocker, J., Goerlitz, G., Hart, A., Scholderer, J., & Solomon, K. (2008) Potential for the adaptation of probabilistic risk assessments by end-users and decision–makers. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 14, 166–178.
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2011). The associative-propositional evaluation model. Theory, evidence, and open questions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 59–127.
Glöckner, A., & Witteman, C. (2010). Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making. Thinking and Reasoning, 16(1), 1–25.
Goodall, C. E. (2011). An overview of implicit measures of attitudes: Methods, mechanisms, strengths, and limitations. Communication Methods and Measures, 5(3), 203–222.
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(6), 1464.
Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-Analysis of Predictive Validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17–41.
Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998–1002.
Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1369–1385.
Holland, R. W., Verplanken, B., & Van Knippenberg, A. (2002). On the nature of attitude-behavior relations: The strong guide, the weak follow. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(6), 869–876.
Hübner, G., & Kaiser, F. G. (2006). The moderating role of the attitude-subjective norms conflict on the link between moral norms and intention. European Psychologist, 11(2), 99–109.
Jonas, K., Broemer, P., & Diehl, M. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 35–74.
Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720.
Kaiser, F. G., Woelfing, S., & Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(1), 1–19.
Kaiser, F. G., Schultz, P. W., & Scheuthle, H. (2007). The theory of planned behavior without compatibility? Beyond method bias and past trivial associations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(7), 1522–1544.
Krosnick, J. A., Boninger, D. S., Chuang, Y. C., Berent, M. K., & Carnot, C. G. (1993). Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(9), 1132–1151.
Lebel, E. P., & Paunonen, S. V. (2011). Sexy but often unreliable: The impact of unreliability on the replicability of experimental findings with implicit measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(4), 570–583.
Lee, C. J., Scheufele, D. A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2005). Public attitudes toward emerging technologies: Examining the interactive effects of cognitions and affect on public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Science Communication, 27(2), 240–267.
Nordgren, L. F., van Harreveld, F., & van der Pligt, J. (2006). Ambivalence, discomfort, and motivated information processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 252–258.
Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 54–74.
Oyserman, D. (2009). Identity-based motivation: Implications for action-readiness, procedural-readiness, and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 250–260.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer.
Reinders, M. J., van der Lans, I. A., Fischer, A. R. H., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2013) A review to collate information on external communication as a basis of innovation success. Connect4Action Deliverable. Wageningen.
Ronteltap, A., van Trijp, J. C. M., Renes, R. J., & Frewer, L. J. (2007). Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations: Lessons for the future of nutrigenomics. Appetite, 49(1), 1–17.
Sandberg, T., & Conner, M. (2008). Anticipated regret as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(4), 589–606. doi:10.1348/014466607x258704.
Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1996). Attitude strength and the concept of crystallization. In H. Schuman & S. Presser (Eds.), Questions and answers in attitude surveys; experiments on question form, wording, and context (pp. 251–273). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45.
Schwarz, N. (2007). Attitude construction: Evaluation in context. Social Cognition, 25(5), 638–656.
Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2002). What doesn’t kill me makes me stronger: The effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1298–1313.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. doi:10.1037/a0018963.
Van Giesen, R. I., Fischer, A. R. H., Van Dijk, H., & Van Trijp, H. C. M. (2015). Affect and cognition in attitude formation toward familiar and unfamiliar attitude objects. PLoS ONE, 10(10). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141790.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly Management Information Systems, 36(1), 157–178.
Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude—Behavioral intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(2), 169–194.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fischer, A.R.H. (2017). Perception, Attitudes, Intentions, Decisions and Actual Behavior. In: Emilien, G., Weitkunat, R., Lüdicke, F. (eds) Consumer Perception of Product Risks and Benefits. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50530-5_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50530-5_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50528-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50530-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)