Skip to main content

Water Security as the Centerpiece of the Sustainable Development Agenda

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Human Face of Water Security

Part of the book series: Water Security in a New World ((WSEC))

Abstract

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development has adopted some unique fundamentals: it is universal and applies to all countries; it is comprehensive and seeks to completely eliminate problems; it is complex as shown by the large numbers of goals and targets; and, it is ambitious as it aims to fix major global problems in a 15-year span. It signifies a paradigm shift in international development that emphasizes the role of national governments and other domestic stakeholders. Water security is a keystone element in achieving the 2030 Agenda – not just for Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6 that focuses primarily on water security, but a number of targets embedded within other SDGs related to health, cities, consumption, marine resources, and terrestrial ecosystems. The concept of water security is quite pervasive in the international discourse on sustainable development, and lines up strongly with the notion of water as a human right. For the SDGs to succeed, water security must be achieved across all geographic scales – from international to national to sub-national to community – and across all social strata. Achieving this objective requires considerable alignment of all stakeholders: governments, farmers, private businesses, civil society organizations, researchers, and scientists. Implementation to achieve the various water-related targets offers an excellent opportunity for creating innovative and integrated solutions. These solutions require equally innovative and enabling policy environment, a role that is typically well suited to governments at various levels. Future outlook for achieving universal water security for all individuals is positive, but requires considerable rethinking around economic and social development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 20–22 June 2012.

References

  • Adeel, Z. (2012). A human development approach to water security. In H. Bigas, T. Morris, R. Sandford, & Z. Adeel (Eds.), The global water crisis: Addressing an urgent security issue. Hamilton: United Nations University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adeel, Z. (2014). Engaging and incentivizing the private sector: An emerging opportunity for the water world. New Water Policy and Practice Journal, 1(1), 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adeel, Z., Aslov, S., Maestu, J., & Unver, O. (2015). Water cooperation – Views on progress and the way forward. Hamilton: United Nations University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodansky, D. (2016). The Paris climate change agreement: An new hope. American Journal of International Law, 110. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2773895.

  • Boyd, D. (2012). The right to water: Moving from international recognition to national action. In H. Bigas, T. Morris, R. Sandford, & Z. Adeel (Eds.), The global water crisis: Addressing an urgent security issue. Hamilton: United Nations University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, S.-J., & Chung, Y.-H. (2015). Trends and challenges of aid effectiveness: The rise of Asia. In I.-H. Cheng & S.-J. Chan (Eds.), International education aid in developing Asia. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chhibber, A. (2016). Assessing and evaluating the Addis Ababa Action Agenda (AAAA). NIPFP working paper series No. 166. New Delhi: National Institute of Public Finance and Policy (NIPFP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chociej, Z., & Adeel, Z. (2012). Legal and ethical dimensions of a right to water. In H. Bigas, T. Morris, R. Sandford, & Z. Adeel (Eds.), The global water crisis: Addressing an urgent security issue. Hamilton: United Nations University.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECCC. (2016). Planning for a sustainable future: A federal sustainable development strategy for Canada 2016–2019. Gatineau: Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehling, M., Nelson, B. D., & Venkatapuram, S. (2013). Limitations of the millennium development goals: A literature review. Global Public Health, 8(10), 1109–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, T. (1999). Capacity building and institutional development: Reflections on water. Public Administration and Development, 19, 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda-Parr, S., Yamin, A. E., & Greenstein, J. (2014). The power of numbers: A critical review of millennium development goal targets for human development and human rights. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15(2–3), 105–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hout, W. (2002, June). Good governance and aid: Selectivity criteria in development assistance. Development and Change, 33(3), 511–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2014). Summary for policymakers. In C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea, & L. L. White (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 1–32). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IRF2015. (2013). Post-2015: Framing a new approach to substantial development. Washington DC: Independent Research Forum 2015 (IRF2015). Retrieved April 13, 2016, from http://pubs.iied.org/G03559.html?k=framing%20a%20new%20approach

  • Kelegama, S. (Ed.). (2012). Foreign aid in South Asia: The emerging scenario. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjorven, O., Nippita, N., & Wietzke, F. B., (2015). The Addis Ababa Action Agenda: Strengths, weaknesses, and the way ahead. New York: UNICEF Connect, United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Retrieved August 22, 2016, from https://blogs.unicef.org/blog/the-addis-ababa-action-agenda-strengths-weaknesses-and-the-way-ahead/

  • Laukkonen, J., Blanco, P. K., Lenhart, J., Keiner, M., Cavric, B., & Kinuthia-Njenga, C. (2009). Combining climate change adaptation and mitigation measures at the local level. Habitat International, 33, 287–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MA. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA)/Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelowa, K., & Weber, A. (2007). Aid effectiveness in Primary, secondary and tertiary education. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved December 23, 2015, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001555/155559e.pdf

  • Mosley, P., Hudson, J., & Verschoor, A. (2004, June). Aid, poverty reduction and the ‘new conditionality’. The Economic Journal, 114, F217–F243.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2006). Harmonising donor practices for effective aid delivery, volume 2 – Budget support, sector wide approaches and capacity development in public financial management, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), DAC guidelines and reference series. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pardy, B. (2012). False panacea: The human right to water. In H. Bigas, T. Morris, R. Sandford, & Z. Adeel (Eds.), The global water crisis: Addressing an urgent security issue. Hamilton: United Nations University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravnborg, H. M., Larsen, R. K., Vilsen, J. L., & Funder, M. (2013). Environmental governance and development cooperation achievements and challenges (p. 15). Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies – DIIS Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, L. K. (2012). Capacity building as a policy instrument in water conservation: A case study on commercial, industrial, and institutional consumers. Water Resources Management, 26(13), 3819–3829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schellnhuber, H. J., Rahmstorf, S., & Winkelmann, R. (2016). Why the right climate target was agreed in Paris. Nature Climate Change, 6, 649–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster-Wallace, C. J., & Sandford, R. (2015). Water in the world we want. Hamilton: United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health and United Nations Office for Sustainable Development, UNU-INWEH.

    Google Scholar 

  • SDSN. (2014). Framing sustainable development goals targets and indicators, Issue brief. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International. (2008). Global corruption report 2008 – Corruption in the water sector. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved February 18, 2016, from http://issuu.com/transparencyinternational/docs/global_corruption_report_2008?e=2496456/2011923

  • UN. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development, A/RES/70/1. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (1994). Human development report, 1994. Cultural liberty in today’s diverse world. New York: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF and WHO. (2015). Progress on sanitation and drinking water – 2015 update and MDG assessment. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and World Health Organization (WHO).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNISDR. (2015). Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. Geneva: The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNSGAB. (2015). The UNSGAB journey: United Nations secretary-general’s advisory board on water and sanitation (2004–2015). New York: UNSGAB. Retrieved January 15, 2016, from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/topics/water/unsgab

  • UNU and UNOSD. (2013). Water for sustainability: Framing water within the post-2015 development Agenda. Hamilton: United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health (UNU-INWEH), UN Office of Sustainable Development (UNOSD) and Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), UNU-INWEH.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-Water. (2010). Climate change adaptation: The pivotal role of water. Geneva: UN-Water. Retrieved August 18, 2016, from http://www.unwater.org/downloads/unw_ccpol_web.pdf

  • UN-Water. (2013). Water security & the global water agenda, a UN-water analytical brief. Hamilton: United Nations University.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-Water. (2014). Investing in water and sanitation: Increasing access, reducing inequalities, UN-Water global analysis and assessment of sanitation and drinking-water, GLAAS 2014 report. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEF. (2016). The global risks report 2016, 11th edition. Davos: World Economic Forum (WEF).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2016). Market capitalization of listed domestic companies (current US$), World Federation of Exchanges database. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved August 22, 2016, from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/CM.MKT.LCAP.CD

  • World Bank and IMF. (2005). Synthesis – 2005 review of the PRS approach: Balancing accountabilities and scaling up results. Washington, DC: The World Bank and The International Monetary Fund (IMF).

    Google Scholar 

  • WWC. (2015). Water: Fit to finance? Catalyzing national growth through investment in water security, Report of the high level panel on financing infrastructure for a water-secure world, April 2015, World Water Council (WWC). Marseilles: World Water Council (WWC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, Y. (2011). Beijing consensus or Washington consensus: What explains China’s economic success. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved December 23, 2015, from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/6098

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zafar Adeel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annex 2.1: The Millennium Development Goals

Annex 2.1: The Millennium Development Goals

Goal 1: Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger

  • Target 1A: Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people living on less than $1.25 a day

  • Target 1B: Achieve Decent Employment for Women, Men, and Young People

  • Target 1C: Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people who suffer from hunger

Goal 2: Achieve universal primary education

  • Target 2A: By 2015, all children can complete a full course of primary schooling, girls and boys

Goal 3: Promote gender equality and empower women

  • Target 3A: Eliminate gender disparity in primary and secondary education preferably by 2005, and at all levels by 2015

Goal 4: Reduce child mortality rates

  • Target 4A: Reduce by two-thirds, between 1990 and 2015, the under-five mortality rate

Goal 5: Improve maternal health

  • Target 5A: Reduce by three quarters, between 1990 and 2015, the maternal mortality ratio

  • Target 5B: Achieve, by 2015, universal access to reproductive health

Goal 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria, and other diseases

  • Target 6A: Have halted by 2015 and begun to reverse the spread of HIV/AIDS

  • Target 6B: Achieve, by 2010, universal access to treatment for HIV/AIDS for all those who need it

  • Target 6C: Have halted by 2015 and begun to reverse the incidence of malaria and other major diseases

Goal 7: Ensure environmental sustainability

  • Target 7A: Integrate the principles of sustainable development into country policies and programs; reverse loss of environmental resources

  • Target 7B: Reduce biodiversity loss, achieving, by 2010, a significant reduction in the rate of loss

  • Target 7C: Halve, by 2015, the proportion of the population without sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation

  • Target 7D: By 2020, to have achieved a significant improvement in the lives of at least 100 million slum-dwellers

Goal 8: Develop a global partnership for development

  • Target 8A: Develop further an open, rule-based, predictable, non-discriminatory trading and financial system

  • Target 8B: Address the Special Needs of the Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

  • Target 8C: Address the special needs of landlocked developing countries and small island developing States

  • Target 8D: Deal comprehensively with the debt problems of developing countries through national and international measures in order to make debt sustainable in the long term

  • Target 8E: In co-operation with pharmaceutical companies, provide access to affordable, essential drugs in developing countries

  • Target 8F: In co-operation with the private sector, make available the benefits of new technologies, especially information and communications

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Adeel, Z. (2017). Water Security as the Centerpiece of the Sustainable Development Agenda. In: Devlaeminck, D., Adeel, Z., Sandford, R. (eds) The Human Face of Water Security. Water Security in a New World. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50161-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics