Skip to main content

E-Participation Portals Automated Monitoring System for Political and Social Research

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Transformation and Global Society (DTGS 2016)

Abstract

This paper presents the opportunities, advantages and limitations of e-participation portals automated monitoring system (AMS) in social and political research. The system was initially developed in 2013 to analyse petitioning and voting dynamics of the Russian e-petitions portal – the Russian Public Initiative – and then was further expanded. In the paper the architecture and working principles of the system are described. It is argued and exemplified that the data collected automatically from e-petition portals can be used to advance research in several areas: media and PR effects on political participation, issue salience, as well as factors of voting behavior and online political engagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://analytics.prior.nw.ru/services/roi/.

References

  1. Bershadskaya, L., Chugunov, A., Trutnev, D.: Evaluation of e-participation in social networks: Russian e-petitions portal. In: Janssen, M., Bannister, F., Glassey, O., Scholl, H.J., Tambouris, E., Wimmer, M.A., Macintosh, A. (eds.) Innovation and the Public Sector. IFIP EGOV 2014 and ePart 2014, vol. 21, pp. 76–83. IOS, Amsterdam (2014). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-429-9-76

  2. Best, S.J., Krueger, B.S.: Analyzing the representativeness of Internet political participation. Polit. Behav. 27, 183–216 (2005). doi:10.1007/s11109-005-3242-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Decree of President of the Russian Federation № 183 On Consideration of Public Initiatives Submitted by Citizens of the Russian Federation with the Usage of Internet – Resource “Russian Public Initiative”, 4 March 2013. http://base.garant.ru/70326884/#ixzz44ErQGaGk. [in Russian]

  4. Decree of President of the Russian Federation № 601 On General Directions of Public Government System Development, 7 May 2012. http://rg.ru/2012/05/09/gosupravlenie-dok.html. [in Russian]

  5. Dumas, C.L., LaManna, D., Harrison, T.M., Ravi, S.S., Kotfila, C., Gervais, N., Hagen, L., Chen, F.: Examining political mobilization of online communities through e-petitioning behavior in We the People. Big Data Soc. 2, 1–20 (2015). doi:10.1177/2053951715598170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Epstein, L., Segal, J.: Measuring issue salience. Am. J. Pol. Sci. 44, 66–83 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ergazakis, K., Metaxiotis, K., Tsitsanis, T.: A state-of-the-art review of applied forms and areas, tools and technologies for e-participation. Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res. 1, 1–19 (2011). doi:10.4018/jegr.2011010101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hale, S., Margetts, H., Yasseri, T.: Understanding the dynamics of Internet-based collective action using big data: analysing the growth rates of Internet-based petitions. In: Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the UK Political Studies Association (Cardiff, Wales, 25–27 March 2013). https://www.psa.ac.uk/sites/default/files/1050_571_0.pdf

  9. Jho, W., Song, K.J.: Institutional and technological determinants of civil e-Participation: Solo or duet? Gov. Inf. Q. 32, 488–495 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kenski, K., Stroud, N.J.: Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 50, 173–192 (2006). doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, B.J.: Political efficacy, community collective efficacy, trust and extroversion in the information society: differences between online and offline civic/political activities. Gov. Inf. Q. 32, 43–51 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.giq.2014.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lindner, R., Riehm, U.: Broadening participation through e-petitions? an empirical study of petitions to the German parliament. Policy Internet 3, 1–23 (2011). doi:10.2202/1944-2866.1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mellon, J.: Where and when can we use Google Trends to measure issue salience? PS Polit. Sci. Polit. 46, 280–290 (2013). doi:10.1017/S1049096513000279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Min, S.J.: From the digital divide to the democratic divide: Internet skills, political interest, and the second-level digital divide in political Internet use. J. Inf. Technol. Polit. 7, 22–35 (2010). doi:10.1080/19331680903109402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Muscovites Call Traffic Jams and High Prices the Key Problems of Moscow. Vedomosti (2015). http://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/news/2015/08/06/603756-probki-i-dorogoviznu-moskvi. [in Russian]

  16. Navalny, A.: Why to Collect Electronic Signatures for Law Drafts is Right (2014). https://navalny.com/p/3737/. [in Russian]

  17. Norris, P.: Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and The Internet Worldwide. Cambridge University Press, New York (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Putin, V.V.: Democracy and Quality of Government. Kommersant, 6 February 2012. http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/1866753. [in Russian]

  19. Sanford, C., Rose, J.: Characterizing e-participation. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 27, 406–421 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Scheufele, D.A., Tewksbury, D.: Framing, agenda setting, and priming: the evolution of three media effects models. J. Commun. 57, 9–20 (2007). doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00326.x

    Google Scholar 

  21. Search Engine Market Share By Country. Austin Return on Now Internet Marketing (2015). http://returnonnow.com/internet-marketing-resources/2015-search-engine-market-share-by-country/

  22. Wlezien, C.: On the salience of political issues: the problem with ‘most important problem’. Electoral. Stud. 24, 555–579 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wright, S.: Populism and downing street e-petitions: connective action, hybridity, and the changing nature of organizing. Polit. Commun. 32, 414–433 (2015). doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.958256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou, Y., Moy, P.: Parsing framing processes: the interplay between online public opinion and media coverage. J. Commun. 57, 79–98 (2007). doi:10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00330.x

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yury Kabanov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chugunov, A.V., Kabanov, Y., Zenchenkova, K. (2016). E-Participation Portals Automated Monitoring System for Political and Social Research. In: Chugunov, A., Bolgov, R., Kabanov, Y., Kampis, G., Wimmer, M. (eds) Digital Transformation and Global Society. DTGS 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 674. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49700-6_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49700-6_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49699-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49700-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics