Skip to main content

Modern Trends in Evaluation of Macroeconomic Structural Changes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Industry 4.0

Abstract

The evolution of social-economic systems is nonlinear, containing both periods of gradual changes and swift transformational upswings. Seven years after the end of the last crisis of 2007–2009, recovery rates of the US and European economies remain extremely low. One of the reasons is structural-economic crisis, requiring considerable time and substantial financial resources to overcome. By the start of the crisis, all developed economies of the world, particularly US economy, had well pronounced structural allometry with disproportionally high share of the financial and banking sectors.

In this paper we propose new approaches for the evaluation of structural shifts, based on the attractor theory, the use of proportionality factor and Wold-Mensch’ nonlinear model. Our results allow the construction of structural changes monitoring system and also demonstrated, that there always exist certain states in economic system, in which the volume of production (GDP) exceeds their empirical value. The proposed system for the monitoring of structural changes can be used not only for research purposes, but also for structural shift management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Finite domain of unavoidable convergence of phase trajectories of complex system movement is called attractor in synergetic. Point (stable focus) or another system that is more complex can stay in the capacity of attractor.

  2. 2.

    In the capacity of statistical base we used database from http:/www.oecd.org/statisticdata/

  3. 3.

    Let us find solution of Eq. (5) with the aid of fsolve optimization function in proximity to P t P t known values.

References

  • Barhin, G. I., & Chesnokov, A. S. (1983). O metodologii izmerenija strukturnyh sdvigov [About the methodology for measuring structural changes]. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody, 19(2), 251–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, R., & Wold, H. (1983). Fix-point estimation in theory and practice. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butina, M. A. (1980). Metody izmerenija strukturnyh sdvigov i ih prilozhenija [Methods of measuring structural changes and their applications]. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody, 16(4), 687–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, N. (2012). Structural change in the New Zealand economy (1974–2012). Draft Paper for the Long-term External Panel, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, A. P. (1970). Structural change in the american economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. (1957). The conditions of economic progress. New York and London: Maсmillan and St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., & Chakrobarty, D. (2005). The structure of the indian economy. Fifteenth International Input–Output Conference. Renmin University in Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, F. M. (1966). The identification problem in econometrics. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, N., & Nelson, D. (2004). Structural change and the labor-market effects of globalization. Review of International Economics, 12(5), 769–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawrycka, M., Sobiechowska-Ziegert, A., & Szymczak, A. (2012). The impact of technological and structural changes in the national economy on the labour-capital relations. Contemporary Economics, 6(1), 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, F., & Stern, N. (2015, June). China’s “new normal”: Structural change, better growth, and peak emissions. Policy brief. London: Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, J., & Planting, M. A. (2000). Using input-output analysis to measure U.S. economic structural change over a 24 Year period. BEA WP2000-01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraguchi, N., & Rezonja, G. (2010). Structural change and sectoral growth in selected East Asian countries. Working paper 18/2009. Vienna: UNIDO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvie, C., & Lee, H. H. (2003, January). Export led industrialization and growth Korea’s economic miracle 1962–1989. Department of Economics, University of Wollongong. http://ro.uow.edu.au/commwkpapers/67/

  • Herfindahl, O.C. (1950). Concentration in the steel industry. Dissertation, Columbia University. Retrieved 6 June 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1945). National power and the structure of foreign trade 1980 expanded ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iiduka, N. (2007). Examining Japan’s expansion from the viewpoint of industrial structure. Japan Center for Economic Research (JCER) Staff Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Industrial Development for the 21st Century: Sustainable Development Perspectives. (2007). New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Industry and Development. (1985). Global Report. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahrl, F., & Roland-Horst, D. (2009). Growth and structural change in China’s energy economy. Energy, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2009.03.009.

  • Kei-Mu, Y., & Zhang, J. (2010). Structural changе in an open economy. Working paper 595. Research Seminar in International Economic, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossov, V. V. (1975). Pokazateli rosta i razvitija ekonomiki [Indicators of economic growth and development]. Voprosy jekonomiki, 12, 37–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznetsov, V. I. (ed) (1988). Zapadnaja Evropa—evoljucija ekonomicheskoj struktury [Western Europe—The evolution of the economic structure]. Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laitner, J. (2000). Structural change and economic growth. Review of Economic Studies, 67, 545–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebedeva, I. P. (1986). Strukturnye izmenenija v yaponskoy promyshlennosti [Structural changes in the Japanese industry]. Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W. (1941). Structure of the American economy, 1919–1929. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W. (1953). Studies in the structure of the american economy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Memedovic, O. (2009). The Impact of institutions on structural change in manufacturing: The case of international trade regime in textiles and clothing. Research and statistics branch working Paper 25/2009. Veinna: UNIDO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mensch, G. O. (1975). Das Technologische Patt: Innovationen uberwingen die Depression. Frankfurt: Umschau. (G. O. Mensch, Trans., 1979, Stalemate in technology: Innovations overcome the depression, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mensch, G. O. (1982). Basic innovations and industrial growth. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Unity of the Sciences (lCUS) 1981 (Vol. 2, pp. 499–515). New York: ICF Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mensch, G. O., Kaasch, K., Kleinknecht, A., & Schnopp, R. (1980). Innovation trends and switching between full and underemployment equilibria, 1950–1978. Discussion paper IIM/dp 80–5. Berlin: International Institute of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minasyan, G. (1983). K izmereniju i analizu strukturnoj dinamiki [About measuring and analyzing of structural dynamics]. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody 19(2):264–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natuhara, K. (2008). Structural change and economic growth: evidence from Japan. Economic Bulletin, 15(9), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naude, W., & Szirmai, A. (2015). Structural change and industrial development in the brics. Oxford: OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., & Winter, S. J. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, S., Redding, S., & Swaffield, J. (2008). The uneven pace of deindustrialization in the OECD. World Economy, 31(9), 1154–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oulton, N., Srinivasan, S. (2005) Productivity growth in UK industries, 1970–2000: Structural change and the role of ICT. Working Paper No. 259. Bank of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, M. T. (2009). Structural change, employment specialization and regional labour market performance: Evidence for the UK. Applied Economics, 41(3), 275–293. doi:10.1080/00036840601007278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruelle, D., & Takens, F. (1971). On the nature of turbulence. Communications of Mathematical Physics, 20, 167–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonis, M., Hewings, G. J. D., & Guo, J. (1996). Sources of structural change in input–output systems: A field of influence approach. Economic Systems Research, 8(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spasskaya, O. V. (2003). Makrojekonomicheskie metody issledovanija i izmerenija strukturnyh izmenenij [Macroeconomic research methods and measurement of structural changes] (Vol. 1, pp. 20–39). Working papers, Institute of Economic Forecasting of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G., Murray, T., & Jomini, P. (2012). Trade, employment and structural change: The Australian experience. In D. Lippoldt (Ed.), Policy priorities for international trade and jobs. OECD, e-publication. http://www.oecd.org/trade/icite

  • Varum, C. A., Cibrão, B., Morgado, A., & Costa, J. (2009). R&D, structural change and productivity: The role of high and medium-high technology industries. Economia Aplicada, 13(4), 399–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vatnik, P. A. (2011). Izmerenie proporcional’nosti [The measurement of proportionality]. Vestnik Inzhekona. Seriya: Ekonomika, Vypusk, 5(48), 172–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., & Zhou, Y. (2014). Structural imbalance, inequality and economic growth. In L. Song, R. Garnaut, & C. Fang (Eds.), Deepening reform for China’s long-term growth and development. Canberra: ANU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wold, H., & Kaasch, K. (1985). Transfers between industrial branches in the course of Schumpeter-Mensch Long Swings. In T. Vasko (Ed.), The long wave debate. Selected papers. Weimar, GDR. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wold, H., & Mensch, G. O. (1983). Nonlinear extensions in pls soft modeling. Working Paper WSOM WP-B3-D11. Cleveland, OH: Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wold, H., & Mensch, G. O. (1985) The BIEQ-PLS model of a Schumpeterian wave. Working Paper WSOM WP 85–017. Cleveland, OH: Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Askar I. Sarygulov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yevsikov, I.A., Korovin, K.O., Sarygulov, A.I. (2017). Modern Trends in Evaluation of Macroeconomic Structural Changes. In: Devezas, T., Leitão, J., Sarygulov, A. (eds) Industry 4.0. Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49604-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics