Abstract
Recent research has highlighted how intensely accounting literature has focused on the potential benefits of XBRL for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of communication between companies and their internal and external stakeholders. Some studies have analyzed ex ante the degree of compatibility between the existing XBRL Taxonomies and actual corporate financial reporting practices, in order to identify the degree of potential misfit between these taxonomies and the related reported items in company financial statements. Other works have addressed the structural characteristics of voluntary XBRL adopters, particularly in the USA, based on the voluntary filing program of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Finally, some papers consider the relevant impacts of XBRL technology in one of two ways: either (a) once its formal implementation has already occurred (on a voluntary or mandatory basis) or (b), even before then, by assessing ex ante the potential impacts of this technology.
Based on existing research on the motivation and characteristics of companies providing voluntary disclosures, our work takes a third way, by considering a pilot project activated in 2011 to implement the IFRS Taxonomy in the Italian market, thanks to an initiative of XBRL Italy. This empirical study was conducted over a fairly limited sample of both listed and non-listed Italian companies using a case study methodology and applying the 2011 IFRS Taxonomy to the main quantitative financial statements of the surveyed companies (statement of financial position, statement of comprehensive income, cash flow statement, and statement of changes in equity), which we globally refer to as “face financials.” The results of each application were then grouped together to derive qualitative considerations on the extent to which the 2011 IFRS Taxonomy fitted the actual needs of preparers. This study is qualitative in nature and represents the first step of a multiyear project to improve the IFRS Taxonomy by identifying the labels that need to be adjusted to match the local Italian accounting requirements.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
XBRL is a markup language designed to code, use, and exchange business data in a way that computers can directly manage it. It’s an open standard, free of license fees, derived from XML and promoted by XBRL International Inc. Thanks to XBRL accountants, auditors and users can share, reuse, and analyze data in a new interactive way. XBRL is either mandated or voluntarily used for filing accounts in several countries including Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, Denmark, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Korea, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Singapore, the United Kingdom, India, Brazil, Japan, and the USA.
- 2.
An XBRL Taxonomy is a list of concepts with their corresponding tags for a specific reporting purpose, such as filing financial information under IFRS or US GAAP. Similar to a dictionary, it defines each concept and describes its attributes and relationships. Each concept used in an XBRL document must be defined in the corresponding XBRL Taxonomy.
References
Debreceny, R. S. (2012). The evolution and future of XBRL research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 13, 83–90.
Valentinetti, D., & Rea, M. A. (2012). IFRS Taxonomy and financial reporting practices: The case of Italian listed companies. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 13, 163–180.
Debreceny, R. S., Chandra, A., Cheh, J. J., Guithues-Amrhein, D., Hannon, N. J., Hutchison, P. D., et al. (2005). Financial reporting in XBRL on the SEC’s EDGAR system: A critique and evaluation. Journal of Information Systems, 19, 191.
Bonson, E., Cortijo, V., & Escobar, T. (2008). The role of XBRL in enhanced business reporting (EBR). Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 5, 161–173.
Blankespoor, E., Miller, B. P., & White, H. D. (2011). XBRL and transition period market frictions. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
Premuroso, R. F., & Bhattacharya, S. (2008). Do early and voluntary filers of financial information in XBRL format signal superior corporate governance and operating performance? International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 9, 1–20.
Piechocki, M. C., Felden, A., Graning, C., & Debreceny, R. (2009). Design and standardization of XBRL solutions for governance and transparency. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 6, 224–240.
Cho, Y. J., Bhattacharya, N., & Kim, J. B. (2014). XBRL Mandate and access to information: Evidence from reactions of financial analysts and institutional investors. American Accounting Association Annual Meeting. Research Collection School of Accountancy.
Wang, T., Wen, C. Y., & Seng, J. L. (2014). The association between the mandatory adoption of XBRL and the performance of listed state-owned enterprises and non-state-owned enterprises in China. Information & Management, 51(3), 336–346.
Liu, C., Yao, L. J., Sia, C. L., & Wei, K. K. (2014). The impact of early XBRL adoption on analysts’ forecast accuracy-empirical evidence from China. Electronic Markets, 24(1), 47–55.
Kaya, D. (2014). The influence of firm-specific characteristics on the extent of voluntary disclosure in XBRL: Empirical analysis of SEC filings. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 22(1), 2–17.
Boritz, J. E. (2009). Assurance on XBRL-related documents: The case of United Technologies Corporation. Journal of Information Systems, 23(2), 49–78.
Debreceny, R. S., Farewell, S. M., Piechocki, M., Felden, C., Graning, A., & d’Eri, A. (2011). Flex or break? Extensions in XBRL disclosures to the SEC. Accounting Horizons, 25(4), 631–657.
Ragothama, S. (2012). Voluntary XBRL adopters and firm characteristics: An empirical analysis. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 12, 93–119.
Müller-Wickop, N., Schultz, M., & Nüttgens, M. (2013). XBRL: Impacts, issues and future research directions. Enterprise Applications and Services in the Finance Industry, Volume 135 of the series Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (pp. 112–130). Springer.
Pinsker, R., & Li, S. (2008). Costs and benefits of XBRL adoption: Early evidence. Communications of the ACM, 51, 47–50. Association for Computing Machinery.
Plumlee, R. D., & Plumlee, M. A. (2008). Assurance on XBRL for financial reporting. Accounting Horizons, 22, 353–368.
Doolin, B., & Troshani, I. (2007). Organizational adoption of XBRL. Electronic Markets, 17(3), 199–209.
Boritz, J. E., & No, W. G. (2008). The SEC’s XBRL voluntary filing program on EDGAR: A case for quality assurance. Current Issues in Auditing, 2(2), A36–A50.
Bartley, J., Chen, Y., & Taylor, E. (2010). Avoiding common errors of XBRL implementation. Journal of Accountancy, 209, 46–51.
Bartley, J., Chen, A. Y. S., & Taylor, E. Z. (2011). A comparison of XBRL filings to corporate 10-Ks-evidence from the voluntary filing program. Accounting Horizons, 25(2), 227–245.
Harris, T., & Morsfield, S. (2012). An evaluation of the current state and future of XBRL and interactive data for investors and analysts. White Paper. Columbia Business School.
Blankespoor, E., Miller, B. P., & White, H. D. (2014). Initial evidence on the market impact of the XBRL mandate. Review of Accounting Studies, 19(4), 1468–1503.
Yen, J. C., & Wang, T. (2015). The Association between XBRL adoption and market reactions to earnings surprises. Journal of Information Systems, 29(3), 51–71.
Nobes, C. (1998). Towards a general model of the reasons for International differences in financial reporting. Abacus, 34(2), 162–187.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fradeani, A., Regoliosi, C., D’Eri, A., Campanari, F. (2017). Implementation of Mandatory IFRS Financial Disclosures in a Voluntary Format: Evidence from the Italian XBRL Project. In: Corsi, K., Castellano, N., Lamboglia, R., Mancini, D. (eds) Reshaping Accounting and Management Control Systems. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49538-5_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49538-5_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49537-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49538-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)