Abstract
We propose a way of connecting the form of a sentence to its meaning and then to its concept. Meaning is the pure, authentic, and unadorned semantic interpretation of form, and concept is meaning adorned by social needs and cultural values in a particular speech community. To frame this view, we borrow the Interface Theory proposed by Chomsky. In that theory, a grammar has three major components: (1) The Computational System, (2) The Conceptual System, and (3) The Sensory-motor System. For a sentence x, the computational system creates a syntactic form f(x), gives it a semantic content, sem(x), then sends it to the conceptual system, to adorn it as a concept, con(x), which the sensory-motor system then processes as a phonetic form, p(x). With this procedure of interface, we can derive a language-specific sentence from its universal origin.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Chomsky, N.: Problem of projection. Lingua 130, 33–49 (2013)
Berwick, R.C., Chomsky, N.: The biolinguistic program: the current state of its development. In: Di Sciullo, A., Boeckx, C. (ed.), pp. 19–41 (2011). (kindle 687–1143)
Berwick, R.C., Chomsky, N.: Why only us: Language and evolution. MIT Press (2016)
Di Sciullo, A., Boeckx, C. (eds.): Biolinguistic Enterprise: New perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language faculty. Oxford, New York (2011)
Goldberg, A.: Constructions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1995)
Goldberg, A.: Constructions at Work. Oxford University Press (2006)
Goldberg, A.: Forthcoming. Explain Me This
Huang, C.-T.: Wo Pao de kuai and Chinese phrase structure. Language 64, 274–311 (1988)
Huang, C.-R., Mangione, L.: A reanalysis of de: adjuncts and subordinate clauses. In: Proceedings of West Cost Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics IV (WCCFL IV), pp. 80–81. Stanford: Stanford Linguistics Association (1985)
Larson, R.: On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335–92 (1988)
Tai, J.H.-Y.: Temporal sequence and Chinese word order. In: Haiman, J. (ed.) Iconicity in Syntax, pp. 49–72. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (1985)
Tai, J.H.-Y.: Temporal sequence in Chinese: a rejoinder. In: Su, L.I.-W., Lien, C., Chui, K. (eds.) Form and Function: Linguistic Studies in Honor of Shuanfan Huang, pp. 331–351. Crane, Taipei (2002)
Wang, W.S.-Y.: Language and people of China. In: Yin, Y.-M., Yang, I.-L., Chan, H.-C. (eds.) Chinese Languages and Linguistics V: Interactions in Language, pp. 1–26. Academia Sinica, Taipei (1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hsieh, HI. (2016). From Form to Meaning and to Concept. In: Dong, M., Lin, J., Tang, X. (eds) Chinese Lexical Semantics. CLSW 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10085. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49508-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49508-8_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49507-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49508-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)