Skip to main content

The Research on Process Characteristics of Different Fuels for Blast Furnace Injection

  • Chapter
6th International Symposium on High-Temperature Metallurgical Processing

Abstract

This paper was mainly focused on the different semi-cokes and charcoal which could be new fuels for blast furnace injection. Through the comparative study with bituminous coal and anthracite coal, the properties of semi-cokes and charcoal were presented in this research. 10 indexes of different fuels were obtained by different standard experiment, including proximate analysis, ultimate analysis, igniting point, explosivity, transportation characteristic, ash properties, grindability, calorific value, combustibility and reactivity with CO2. According to the data analysis, it provided a theoretical basis for rational utilization of various blast furnace fuels, and helped to broaden the scope of the blast furnace injection fuels. This research could contribute to energy conservation, emissions reduction, and sustainable development of iron and steel enterprises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 239.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. Lu, V. Sahajwalla and D. Harris, “Coal char reactivity and structural evolution during combustion—Factors influencing blast furnace pulverized coal injection operation,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 32(5) (2001), 811–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Nomura, T.G. Collcott, “Maximum Rates of Pulverized Coal Injection in Ironmaking Blast Furnaces,” ISIJ International, 51(7) (2011), 1033–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. T. Norgate, N. Haque, M. A. Somerville, and S. Jahanshahi, “Biomass as a Source of Renewable Carbon for Iron and Steelmaking,” ISIJ International, 52(8) (2012), 1472–1481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Babich, D. Senk and M. Fernandez, “Charcoal Behaviour by Its Injection into the Modern Blast Furnace,” ISIJ International, 50(1) (2010), 81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Suopajarvi, T. Fabritius, “Effects of Biomass Use in Integrated Steel Plant — Gate-to-gate Life Cycle Inventory Method,” ISIJ International, 52(5) (2012), 779–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J.G. Mathieson, H. Rogers, M. A. Somerville and S. Jahanshahi, “Reducing Net CO2 Emissions Using Charcoal as a Blast Furnace Tuyere Injectant,” ISIJ International, 52(8) (2012), 1489–1496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R.L. Carr, “Classifying flow properties of solids,” Chem.Eng., 72 (1965a), 69.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.L. Carr, “Evaluating flow properties of solids,” Chem.Eng., 72 (1965), 163.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Xu, Rs., Zhang, Jl., Song, Tf., Wang, Hy., Zhao, D. (2015). The Research on Process Characteristics of Different Fuels for Blast Furnace Injection. In: Jiang, T., et al. 6th International Symposium on High-Temperature Metallurgical Processing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48217-0_45

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics