Abstract
With the development of quench technology, there is a trend of using gas quench to replace liquid quench for less distortion and residual stress. The fundamental difference between the liquid and gas quench is the heat transfer coefficient, not only the values but also the shape of the curve as a function of temperature. The equivalent heat transfer coefficient for the liquid and gas quench is analyzed by simulations and experiments. Even it may result in the same hardness in the liquid and gas quench, the steel microstructure may be different because of the different cooling processes, and therefore other steel properties, such as toughness, may be different. The cooling process, microstructures and properties such as hardness and toughness should be examined when designing the liquid or gas quench processes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
S.J. Midea, T. Holm, S. Segerberg, J. Bodin, T. Thors, K. Swartström, High pressure gas quenching—technical and economic considerations, in: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Quenching and the Control of Distortion, ASM International, 1996, p. 157.
Elkatatny, I., Morsi, Y., Blicblau, A.S., Das, S., Doyle, E.D., 2003, Numerical analysis and experimental validation of high pressure gas quenching. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 42, 417–423.
Wang, J., Gu, J., Shan, X., Hao, X., Chen, N., & Zhang, W. (2008), Numerical simulation of high pressure gas quenching of H13 steel. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 202(1–3), 188–194.
Xiao, B., Wang, G., Wang, Q., Maniruzzaman, M., Sisson, R. D., Jr, & Rong, Y. (2011), An Experimental Study of Heat Transfer During Forced Air Convection. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 20(7), 1264–1270
Cosentino, F., Warnken, N., Gebelin, J.-C., & Reed, R. C. (2013), Numerical and experimental study of post-heat treatment gas quenching and its impact on microstructure and creep in CMSX-10 superalloy. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 213(12), 2350–2360.
Bozidar Liscic, Hans M.Tensi, Lauralice C.F.Canale, George E.Totten, Quenching Theory and Technology, 2010, ISBN 978–0-8493–9279-5
B. Lynn Ferguson, A. Freborg, G. Petrus, Software simulates quenching, Advanced Materials and Processes (August) (2000) H31–H36.
Herring, D.H. A review of gas quenching from the perspective of the heat transfer coefficient, Industrial Heating 2006, February, 67–72
Gensamer, M., Pearsall, E. B., Pellini, W. S., & Low, J. R., Jr. (2012), The Tensile Properties of Pearlite, Bainite, and Spheroidite. Metallography, Microstructure, and Analysis, 1(3–4), 171–189.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lu, Y., Rong, Y., Sisson, R.D. (2015). Equivalency Comparison of Heat Transfer Coefficient in Liquid and Gas Quenches. In: Yurko, J.A., et al. EPD Congress 2015. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48214-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48214-9_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48609-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48214-9
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)