Abstract
Problems of environmental degradation are often conceptualized in terms of collective action dilemmas, and imply an increased demand for coordination and steering by public authorities. Social science is struggling with understanding how attitudes to collective action dilemmas and state intervention actually are formed. In the literature on environmental attitude formation, education is often claimed to be an important factor. It is argued for example that people with university degrees develop certain values essential for beliefs about personal responsibility and concern for the environment. Still there are a number of questions unanswered. For example, we know little about the effects of different educational programs. In this study we test the hypotheses by using a unique longitudinal data set based on surveys distributed to students in economics, law, and political science at seven universities in Sweden. Our results show a slight decrease in ascribed personal responsibility for environmental protection among the students after one semester. Instead, students ascribe an increased responsibility to various institutions and actors.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For a more elaborated discussion about the data see www.lore.gu.se.
References
Carman, C. J. (1998). Dimensions of environmental policy support in the United States. Social Science Quarterly (University of Texas Press), 79(4), 717–733.
Carter, J. R., & Irons, M. D. (1991). Are economists different, and if so, why? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2), 171–177.
Chatard, A., & Selimbegovic, L. (2007). The impact of higher education on egalitarian attitudes and values: Contextual and cultural determinants. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 541–556.
Coulter, I. D., Wilkes, M., & Der-Martirosian, C. (2007). Altruism revisited: A comparison of medical, law and business students’ altruistic attitudes. Medical Education, 41(4), 341–345.
Crawford, S. E. S. (2007). Will we ruin them for (civic) life? Analyzing the impact of teaching rational choice in introductory courses. PS: Political Science & Politics, 40(02), 387–391.
Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193.
Davies, P., Harring, N., & Lundholm, C. (in preparation). Does knowledge affect the choice of environmental policy instruments (EPI) among economics students?
Dietz, T., Dolšak, N., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2002). The drama of the commons. In E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, & N. Dolšak et al (Eds.), The drama of the commons. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Dietz, T., Stern, P. C., & Guagnano, G. A. (1998). Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 30(4), 450–471.
Frank, B., & Schulze, G. G. (2000). Does economics make citizens corrupt? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 43(1), 101–113.
Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. T. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(2), 159–171.
Franzen, A., & Vogl, D. (2013). Two decades of measuring environmental attitudes: A comparative analysis of 33 countries. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1001–1008.
Frey, B. S., & Meier, S. (2003). Are political economists selfish and indoctrinated? Evidence from a natural experiment. Economic Inquiry, 41(3), 448–462.
Frey, B. S., & Meier, S. (2005). Selfish and indoctrinated economists? European Journal of Law and Economics, 19(2), 165–171.
Grouzet, F. M. E. (2014). Development, changes and consolidation of values and goals in business and law schools the dual valuing process model. The Oxford Handbook of Work Engagement, Motivation, and Self-Determination Theory M. Gagné, Oxford University Press.
Guimond, S., Begin, G., & Palmer, D. L. (1989). Education and causal attributions: The development of “person-blame” and “system-blame” ideology. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52(2), 126–140.
Guimond, S., Dambrun, M., Michinov, N., & Duarte, S. (2003). Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 697–721.
Guimond, S., & Palmer, D. L. (1990). Type of academic training and causal attributions for social problems. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20(1), 61–75.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.
Harring, N., & Jagers, S. C. (2013). Should we trust in values? Explaining public support for pro-environmental taxes. Sustainability, 5(1), 210–227.
Harring, N., & Jagers, S. C. (2015). Why and how higher education affects attitudes to environmental state intervention. Conference paper. Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, April 2015, Chicago.
Harring, N. (2016) Reward or punish? understanding preferences toward economic or regulatory instruments in a cross-national perspective. Political Studies, 64(3).
Jones, R. E., & Dunlap, R. E. (1992). The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time? Rural Sociology, 57(1), 28–47.
Klineberg, S. L., McKeever, M., & Rothenbach, B. (1998). Demographic predictors of environmental concern: It does make a difference how it’s measured. Social Science Quarterly (University of Texas Press), 79(4), 734–753.
Koos, S. (2011). Varieties of environmental labelling, market structures, and sustainable consumption across Europe: A comparative analysis of organizational and market supply determinants of environmental-labelled goods. Journal of Consumer Policy, 34(1), 127–151.
Mansbridge, J. (2014). The role of the state in governing the commons. Environmental Science & Policy, 36, 8–10.
Marquart-Pyatt, S. T. (2012). Contextual influences on environmental concerns cross-nationally: A multilevel investigation. Social Science Research, 41(5), 1085–1099.
Marwell, G., & Ames, R. E. (1981). Economists free ride, does anyone else? Experiments on the provision of public goods, IV. Journal of Public Economics, 15(3), 295–310.
Newman, T. P., & Fernandes, R. (2015). A re-assessment of factors associated with environmental concern and behavior using the 2010 General Social Survey. Environmental Education Research, 1–23.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. The American Political Science Review, 92(1), 1–22.
SFS. (1992). Högskolelag (the higher education act), SFS 1992:1434. Stockholm, Sweden: Department of Education.
Sidanius, J., Sinclair, S., & Pratto, F. (2006). Social dominance orientation, gender, and increasing educational exposure1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(7), 1640–1653.
Steiner, J. (1990). Rational choice theories and politics: A research agenda and a moral question. PS: Political Science & Politics, 23(01), 46–50.
United Nations. (2005). 59/237. United Nations decade of education for sustainable development. United Nations General Assembly, New York NY 24 February, 2005, United Nations.
Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 44(2), 181–197.
Wang, L., Malhotra, D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2011). Economics education and greed. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(4), 643–660.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harring, N., Lundholm, C., Torbjörnsson, T. (2017). The Effects of Higher Education in Economics, Law and Political Science on Perceptions of Responsibility and Sustainability. In: Leal Filho, W., Brandli, L., Castro, P., Newman, J. (eds) Handbook of Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development in Higher Education . World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47868-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47868-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47867-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47868-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)