Skip to main content

Framing Effects

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior

Abstract

Framing effects occur when presenting information in different ways changes, and even reverses, how people make judgments and decisions about equivalent choice problems. The literature suggests that framing effects are critical to our understanding of how people make decisions, and especially choices involving risk. This entry outlines some of the essential literature on framing effects across contexts and among both human and nonhuman animal populations. Discussions of the influence of emotions on framing effects, and the neural mechanisms underlying framing effects, are also included. Finally, this entry describes how research on framing has been translated to more applied settings to expand our understanding of how decisions are made in everyday life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Cassotti, M., Habib, M., Poirel, N., Aite, A., Houde, O., & Moutier, S. (2012). Positive emotional context eliminates the framing effect in decision-making. Emotion, 12(5), 926–931.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. K., Lakshiminaryanan, V., & Santos, L. (2006). How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 517–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science, 313(5787), 684–687.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2010). Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science, 313(5787), 684–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deppe, M., Schwindt, W., Kramer, J., Kugel, H., Plassmann, H., Kenning, P., & Ringelstein, E. B. (2005). Evidence for a neural correlate of a framing effect: Bias-specific activity in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex during credibility judgments. Brain Research Bulletin, 67, 413–421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deppe, M., Schwindt, W., Pieper, A., Kugel, H., Plassmann, H., Kenning, P., Deppe, K., & Ringelstein, E. B. (2007). Anterior cingulate reflects susceptibility to framing during attractiveness evaluation. Neuroreport, 18(11), 1119–1123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, J. N., & McDermott, R. (2008). Emotion and the framing of risky choice. Political Behavior, 30, 297–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C. R., Ratner, R. K., & Lieb, D. S. (2005). How subjective grouping of options influences choice and allocation: Diversification bias and the phenomenon of partition dependence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4), 538–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, C., Dana, J., Koshino, H., & Just, M. (2005). The framing effect and risky decisions: Examining cognitive functions with fMRI. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(2), 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshminarayanan, V. R., Chen, M. K., & Santos, L. R. (2008). Endowment effect in capuchin monkeys. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 3837–3844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshminarayanan, V. R., Chen, M. K., & Santos, L. R. (2011). The evolution of decision-making under risk: Framing effects in monkey risk preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 689–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecheler, S., Schuck, A. R. T., & de Vreese, C. H. (2013). Dealing with feelings: Positive and negative discrete emotions as mediators of news framing effects. Communications, 38(2), 189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 799–823.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I. P., & Gaeth, G. J. (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 374–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I. P., Gaeth, G. J., Schreiber, J., & Lauriola, M. (2002). A new look at framing effects: Distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88(1), 411–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, B., & Kaccelnik, A. (2002). Framing effects and risky decisions in starlings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(5), 3352–3355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 500–510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (2001). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19(3), 221–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J., & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gain-and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56(s1), 5202–5220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnemann, U., Camerer, C. F., Fox, C. R., & Langer, T. (2013). How psychological framing affects economic market prices in the lab and field. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(29), 11779–11784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talmi, D., Hurlemann, R., Patin, A., & Dolan, R. J. (2012). Framing effect following bilateral amygdala lesion. Neuropsychologia, 48, 1823–1827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Windmann, S., Kirsch, P., Mier, D., Stark, R., Walter, B., Gunturkun, O., & Vaitl, D. (2006). On framing effects in decision making: Linking lateral versus medial orbitofrontal cortex activation to choice outcome processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(7), 1198–1211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, H., Wang, X. T., & Zhu, L. (2010). Framing effects: Beyond behavioral dynamics and neural basis. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3198–3204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

During the writing of this publication, the author was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health under Award T32MH018931.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie M. Carpenter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Carpenter, S.M. (2018). Framing Effects. In: Vonk, J., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1571-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1571-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics