Skip to main content

Phylum

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior

Definition

A phylum is a scientific term grouping together related organisms on the basis of their fundamental characteristics.

Introduction

The term phylum was coined by Ernst Hackel (1866) and is derived from the Greek word “phylon,” associated with phyle (tribe). A phylum can be defined either by a group of organisms with a certain degree of morphological or developmental similarity or as a group of organisms with an evolutionary relationship. In classification for taxonomic rank, “Phylum” is placed below “Kingdom” and above “Class” (Fig. 1). In botany, the word division has been used instead of phylum, even though the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants follows the terms as equivalent (Valentine 2004; McNeill et al. 2012a, b). On the basis of definitions, the animal kingdom, plant kingdom, and fungi include 32, 14, and 8 phyla, respectively.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Major taxonomic ranks of biological classification

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abele, L. G., Kim, W., & Felgenhauer, B. E. (1989). Molecular evidence for inclusion of the phylum Pentastomida in the Crustacea. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 6(6), 685–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adoutte, A., Balavoine, G., Lartillot, N., & de Rosa, R. (1999). Animal evolution: The end of the intermediate taxa? Trends in Genetics, 15(3), 104–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. (2000). The origin of animal body plans: a study in evolutionary developmental biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, L. R. (2007). Introductory botany: Plants, people, and the environment. Nelson Education. Cole; 2nd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd, G. E. (1996). The morphology of Opabinia regalis and the reconstruction of the arthropod stem-group. Lethaia, 29(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budd, G. E. (1997). Stem group arthropods from the Lower Cambrian Sirius Passet fauna of North Greenland. In R. A. Fortey & A. H. Thomas (Eds.), Arthropod relationships (Systematics Association Special Volume, Ser. 55, pp. 125–138).

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd, G. E. (1998). Arthropod body-plan evolution in the Cambrian with an example from anomalocaridid muscle. Lethaia, 31(3), 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budd, G. E. (1999). Does evolution in body patterning genes drive morphological change – Or vice versa? BioEssays, 21(4), 326–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budd, G. E., & Jensen, S. (2000). A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla. Biological Reviews, 75(2), 253–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, B., & Mooi, R. (1998). Major events in the evolution of echinoderms viewed by the light of embryology. In R. Mooi & M. Telford (Eds.), Echinoderms San Francisco (pp. 21–28). Rotterdam: Balkema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domazet-Lošo, T., Brajković, J., & Tautz, D. (2007). A phylostratigraphy approach to uncover the genomic history of major adaptations in metazoan lineages. Trends in Genetics, 23(11), 533–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, C. W., Luo, X., & Wu, Z. (2013). Phylogenetic analysis of gene expression. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 53(5), 847–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, D. H. (1993). Early introduction of major morphological innovations. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 38(3–4), 281–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, D. H. A., & Sudhaus, W. (2002). One small step for worms, one giant leap for “Bauplan?”. Evolution & Development, 4(4), 243–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, H., & Janvier, P. (1996). Before the backbone: Views on the origin of the vertebrates. Nature, 384(6607), 324–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gellon, G., & McGinnis, W. (1998). Shaping animal body plans in development and evolution by modulation of Hox expression patterns. BioEssays, 20(2), 116–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. A., Hughes, C. E., & Scotland, R. W. (1997). Primary homology assessment, characters and character states. Cladistics, 13(3), 275–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hejnol, A., & Dunn, C. W. (2016). Animal evolution: Are phyla real? Current Biology, 26(10), R424–R426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israelsson, O. (1999). New light on the enigmatic Xenoturbella (phylum uncertain): Ontogeny and phylogeny. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 266(1421), 835–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies, R. P. (1979). The origin of chordates—a methodological essay. In M. R. House (Ed.), The origin of major invertebrate groups (pp. 443–477). London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S. A. (1992). The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: The Robert H. MacArthur award lecture. Ecology, 73(6), 1943–1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, J., Barrie, F.R., Buck, W.R., Demoulin, V., Greuter, W., Hawksworth, D.L., Prado, J., Prud’homme van Reine, W.F., Smith, G.F., Wiersema, J.H., & Turland, N.J. (Eds.) (2012a). International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code), adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011 (International Association for Plant Taxonomy, Bratislava. Regnum Vegetabile 154, pp. 1–140) Koelz Scientific Books, Königstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, J., Barrie, F. R., Buck, W. R., Demoulin, V., Greuter, W., Hawksworth, D. L., et al. (2012b). International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi and plants (Regnum Vegetabile 154) (pp. 240) Koelz Scientific Books, Königstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooi, R., David, B., & Marchand, D. (1994). Echinoderm skeletal homologies: Classical morphology meets modern phylogenetics. In Echinoderms through time (pp. 87–95). Rotterdam: Balkema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runnegar, B. (1996). Early evolution of the Mollusca: The fossil record. In J. D. Taylor (Ed.), Origin and evolutionary radiation of the Mollusca (pp. 77–87). London: Oxford Science Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, J. W. (2004). On the origin of phyla. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, J. W., & Hamilton, H. (1997). Body plans, phyla, and arthropods. In R. A. Fortey & R. H. Thomas (Eds.), Arthropod relationships (pp. 1–9). London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, J. C. (1940). The course of evolution: By differentiation or divergent mutation rather than by selection. CUP Archives. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z. Q. (2013). Animal biodiversity: An update of classification and diversity in 2013. Zootaxa, 3703(1), 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mukesh Meena .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Samal, S., Swapnil, P., Meena, M. (2019). Phylum. In: Vonk, J., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1197-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1197-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics