Abstract
Considerable attention has been paid to the meaning of product-design gender cues regarding product and brand evaluations. According to self-congruity theory, the gender schema theory, as well as the product-schema congruity theory, traditional consumers react favorably toward sex- or gender-specific product attributes. On the contrary, a twist in gender roles, evolving by emancipation and continual social change, has been identified, which call these congruity assumptions firmly into question. Hence, our study concentrates on the following research question: Is stereotypic sex-typed design still a key principle generating favorable product attitudes and moreover enhancing consumer’s actual and ideal congruence with the brand and brand loyalty? Reexamining the validity of previous findings for modern compared to traditional consumers, we verified regarding the effect of sex-product-design-congruity on product evaluations and brand loyalty (a) the role of modern sex-role perceptions. Thus, this study contributes to self-congruity theory and to the field of product-schema congruity. Due to the change in gender identities, we explore the boundaries of congruency and gender schema theory with special focus on androgynous and not sex-typed consumers’ response toward sex-typed design. Thus, this study adds to state of research by proving (b) the differences in gender identities regarding sex-typed design evaluations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2007). Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 468–479.
Aggarwal, P., & Mcgill, A. L. (2012). When brands seem human, do humans act like brands? Automatic behavioral priming effects of brand anthropomorphism. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(2), 307–323.
Ahluwalia, R. (2000). Examination of psychological processes underlying resistance to persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 217–232.
Batra, R., Lehmann, D. R., & Singh, D. (1993). The brand personality component of brand goodwill: Some antecedents and consequences. In D. A. Aaker & A. L. Biel (Eds.), Brand equity and advertising (pp. 83–96). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bem, S. L. (1981a). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354.
Bem, S. L. (1981b). Bem sex-role inventory: Professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Braunstein, C. (2001). Die Theorie des geplanten Verhaltens zur Erklärung der Kundenbindung–Ein nichtlineares Kausalmodell, Hochschulschrift. Doctoral dissertation. Universität Mainz.
Chandler, J., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Use does not wear ragged the fabric of friendship: Thinking of objects as alive makes people less willing to replace them. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(2), 138–145.
Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1171–1188.
Diekman, A. B., & Goodfriend, W. (2006). Rolling with the changes: A role congruity perspective on gender norms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(4), 369–383.
England, P. (2006). Toward gender equality: Progress and bottlenecks. In F. D. Blau, M. C. Brinton, & D. B. Grusky (Eds.), The declining significance of gender (pp. 245–264). New york: Russell Sage.
Epley, N., Waytz, A., Akalis, S., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Social Cognition, 26(2), 143–155.
Firat, A. F. (1991). Consumption and gender: A common history. In J. A. Costa (Ed.), Gender and consumer behavior (pp. 378–386). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
Fischer, E., & Arnold, S. J. (1994). Sex, gender identity, gender role attitudes, and consumer behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 11(2), 163–182.
Fleck, N., Michel, G., & Zeitoun, V. (2014). Brand personification through the use of spokespeople: An exploratory study of ordinary employees, CEOs, and celebrities featured in advertising. Psychology & Marketing, 31(1), 84–92.
Fugate, D. L., & Phillips, J. (2010). Product gender perceptions and antecedents of product gender congruence. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(3), 251–261.
Fullerton, H. N., Jr. (1999). Labor force participation: 75 years of change, 1950–98 and 1998–2025. Monthly Labor Review, 122, 3.
Grohmann, B. (2009). Gender dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(1), 105–119.
Grubb, E. L., & Grathwohl, H. L. (1967). Consumer self-concept, symbolism and market behavior: A theoretical approach. The Journal of Marketing, 31, 22–27.
Helm, A. E., Moulard, J. G., & Richins, M. (2015). Consumer cynicism: Developing a scale to measure underlying attitudes influencing marketplace shaping and withdrawal behaviors. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(5), 515–524.
Hende, E. A., & Mugge, R. (2014). Investigating gender‐schema congruity effects on consumers’ evaluation of anthropomorphized products. Psychology & Marketing, 31(4), 264–277.
Huberty, C. J. (1994). Why multivariable analysis? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(3), 620–627.
Iyer, E. S., & Debevec, K. (2015). Gender stereotyping of products: Are products like people? In Proceedings of the 1986 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference (pp. 40–45). Switzerland: Springer.
Lee, W. (2006). Cross-gender brand extensions: Effects of gender of the brand, gender of consumer, and product type on evaluation of cross-gender extensions. Advances in Consumer Research, 33, 67.
Lieven, T., Grohmann, B., Herrmann, A., Landwehr, J. R., & Tilburg, M. (2014). The effect of brand gender on brand equity. Psychology & Marketing, 31(5), 371–385.
Neelamegham, R., & Jain, D. (1999). Consumer choice process for experience goods: An econometric model and analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 373–386.
Palan, K. M. (2001). Gender identity in consumer behavior research: A literature review and research agenda. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 10(2001), 1–31.
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., MacCallum, R. C., & Nicewander, W. A. (2005). Use of the extreme groups approach: A critical reexamination and new recommendations. Psychological Methods, 10(2), 178.
Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic.
Sayer, L. C., Bianchi, S. M., & Robinson, J. P. (2004). Are parents investing less in children? Trends in mothers’ and fathers’ time with children1. American Journal of Sociology, 110(1), 1–43.
Schmitt, B. (2012). The consumer psychology of brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(1), 7–17.
Sirgy, M. J., Grewal, D., Mangleburg, T. F., Park, J. O., Chon, K. S., Claiborne, C. B., et al. (1997). Assessing the predictive validity of two methods of measuring self-image congruence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(3), 229–241.
Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 287–300.
Sirgy, M. J. (1986). Self-congruity. New York: Praeger.
Spence, J. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity, and gender-related traits: A conceptual analysis and critique of current research. Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 13, 1–97.
Spence, J. T. (1985). Gender identity and its implications for concepts of masculinity and femininity. In T. Sondregger (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 59–95). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Stern, B. B. (2015). Self-perceived sexual identity: A functional consumer model. In Proceedings of the 1987 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference (pp. 69–73). Switzerland: Springer.
Strauss, J. J., & Hill, D. J. (2015). Magazine readership and adult sex-role schematicity. In Proceedings of the 1995 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference (pp. 43–47). Switzerland: Springer.
Wylie, R. C. (1974). The self-concept: A review of methodological considerations and measuring instruments (Rev. ed.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Ye, L., Pelton, L., & Blankson, C. (2015). An empirical investigation of gender identity on consumers’ product and brand perceptions. In Proceedings of the 2008 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference (p. 191). Switzerland: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Academy of Marketing Science
About this paper
Cite this paper
Huber, F., Strieder, K. (2017). Conformity to Sex-Typed Design in Modern Society. In: Rossi, P. (eds) Marketing at the Confluence between Entertainment and Analytics. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47331-4_256
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47331-4_256
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47330-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47331-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)