Skip to main content

Motor Control of Human Spinal Cord Disconnected from the Brain and Under External Movement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Progress in Motor Control

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 957))

Abstract

Motor control after spinal cord injury is strongly depending on residual ascending and descending pathways across the lesion. The individually altered neurophysiology is in general based on still intact sublesional control loops with afferent sensory inputs linked via interneuron networks to efferent motor outputs. Partial or total loss of translesional control inputs reduces and alters the ability to perform voluntary movements and results in motor incomplete (residual voluntary control of movement functions) or motor complete (no residual voluntary control) spinal cord injury classification. Of particular importance are intact functionally silent neural structures with residual brain influence but reduced state of excitability that inhibits execution of voluntary movements. The condition is described by the term discomplete spinal cord injury. There are strong evidences that artificial afferent input, e.g., by epidural or noninvasive electrical stimulation of the lumbar posterior roots, can elevate the state of excitability and thus re-enable or augment voluntary movement functions. This modality can serve as a powerful assessment technique for monitoring details of the residual function profile after spinal cord injury, as a therapeutic tool for support of restoration of movement programs and as a neuroprosthesis component augmenting and restoring movement functions, per se or in synergy with classical neuromuscular or muscular electrical stimulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angeli CA, Edgerton VR, Gerasimenko YP, Harkema SJ (2014) Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans. Brain 137(Pt 5):1394–1409. And: Angeli C, Edgerton VR, Gerasimenko Y, Harkema SJ (2015) Reply: no dawn yet of a new age in spinal cord rehabilitation. Brain 138(Pt 7):e363

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendersky D, Claudio Yampolsky C (2014) Is spinal cord stimulation safe? A review of its complications. World Neurosurg 82:1359–1368

    Google Scholar 

  • Benfield J, Maknojia A, Epstein F (2016) Progressive paraplegia from spinal cord stimulator Lead fibrotic encapsulation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 95:e30–e33

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron T (2004) Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review. J Neurosurg: Spine 100(3):254–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardenas D (2010) Spinal cord medicine, second edition: principles & practice, 2nd edn. Demos Medical Publishing. ISBN-10: 1933864192

    Google Scholar 

  • Cioni B, Dimitrijevic MR, McKay WB, Sherwood AM (1986) Voluntary supraspinal suppression of spinal reflex activity in paralyzed muscles of spinal cord injury patients. Exp Neurol 93(3):574–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrijevic MR (1987) Neurophysiology in spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 25(3):205–208

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrijevic MR, Gerasimenko Y, Pollo FE (1997) Sustained epidural electrical stimulation of the spinalized lumbar cord in humans can facilitate or suppress spinal reflex and central pattern generator activities. In: Gurfinkel VS, Levik Yu S (eds) Proceedings of the international symposium on brain and movement, vol 60. St. Petersburg, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrijevic MR, Persy I, Forstner C, Kern H, Dimitrijevic MM (2005) Motor control in the human spinal cord. Artif Organs 29(3):216–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrijevic, MR, Kakulas BA, McKay WB, Vrbová G (eds) (2012) Restorative neurology of spinal cord injury. Oxford University Press, NY, 336 pp. ISBN: 978-0-19-974650-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton VR, Harkema S (2011) Epidural stimulation of the spinal cord in spinal cord injury: current status and future challenges. Expert Rev Neurother 11(10):1351–1353

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher LE, Miller ME, Bailey SN, Davis JA Jr, Anderson JS, Rhode L, Tyler DJ, Triolo RJ (2008) Standing after spinal cord injury with four-contact nerve-cuff electrodes for quadriceps stimulation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 16(5):473–478

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Grecco LH, Li S, Michel S, Castillo-Saavedra L, Mourdoukoutas A, Bikson M, Fregni F (2015) Transcutaneous spinal stimulation as a therapeutic strategy for spinal cord injury: state of the art. J Neurorestoratology 3:73–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Jilge B, Minassian K, Rattay F, Pinter MM, Gerstenbrand F, Binder H, Dimitrijevic MR (2004) Initiating extension of the lower limbs in subjects with complete spinal cord injury by epidural lumbar cord stimulation. Exp Brain Res 154:308–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kakulas BA, Bedbrook GM (1976) Injuries of the spine and spinal cord. In: Vinken PJ, Bruyn GW (eds) Handbook of clinical neurology, Chap. 3. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 27–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakulas BA (1987) The clinical neuropathology of spinal cord injury. A guide to the future. Paraplegia 25(3):212–216

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood AM, Dimitrijevic MR, McKay WB (1992) Evidence of subclinical brain influence in clinically complete spinal cord injury: discomplete SCI. J Neurol Sci 110(1–2):90–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr W, Bijak M, Girsch W, Holle J, Lanmüller H, Thoma H, Zrunek M (1993) Multichannel stimulation of phrenic nerves by epineural electrodes. Clinical experience and future developments. ASAIO J 39:M729–M735

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr W, Bijak M, Rafolt D, Sauermann S, Unger E, Lanmüller H (2001) Basic design and construction of the Vienna FES implants: existing solutions and prospects for new generations of implants. Med Eng Phys 23:53–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr W, Hofer C, Bijak M, Rafolt D, Unger E, Sauermann S, Lanmueller H, Kern H (2002) Functional electrical stimulation (FES) of denervated muscles: existing and prospective technological solutions. Basic Appl Myol 12:287

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr W (2015) Early and contemporary approaches for application of FES in movement rehabilitation after spinal cord injury. In: József Laczkó (ed) Progress in motor control X, Budapest July 22–25, 2015; International Society of Motor Control; Hungarian Sports Science Booklets—XII; p 43. ISBN: 978-615-5187-07-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Minassian K, Jilge B, Rattay F, Pinter MM, Binder H, Gerstenbrand F, MR Dimitrijevic MR (2004) Stepping-like movements in humans with complete spinal cord injury induced by epidural stimulation of the lumbar cord: electromyographic study of compound muscle action potentials. Spinal Cord 42(7):401–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir GD, Steeves JD (1997) Sensorimotor stimulation to improve locomotor recovery after spinal cord injury. Trends Neurosci 20(2):72–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nardone R, Höller Y, Taylor A, Thomschewski A, Orioli A, Frey V, Trinka E, Brigo F (2015) Noninvasive spinal cord stimulation: technical aspects and therapeutic applications. Neuromodulation 18(7):580–591 (discussion 590-1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravid N, Prochazka A (2012) Nerve lesioning with direct current. In: Proceedings of 17th annual IFESS conference, Banff, Canada; pp 344–347, 9–12 Sept 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejc E, Angeli C, Harkema S (2015) Effects of lumbosacral spinal cord epidural stimulation for standing after chronic complete paralysis in humans. PLoS ONE 10(7):e0133998

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sayenko DG, Angeli C, Harkema SJ, Edgerton VR, Gerasimenko YP (2014) Neuromodulation of evoked muscle potentials induced by epidural spinal-cord stimulation in paralyzed individuals. J Neurophysiol 111(5):1088–1099

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh KM, Machado AG, Krishnaney AA (2015) Spinal cord stimulation: a review of the safety literature and proposal for perioperative evaluation and management. Spine J 15:1864–1869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wernig A (2015) Response to ‘Randomised controlled trials do not always give the results we want but that doesn’t mean we should abandon randomised controlled trials’. Spinal Cord 53(12):897–898

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Winfried Mayr .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mayr, W., Krenn, M., Dimitrijevic, M.R. (2016). Motor Control of Human Spinal Cord Disconnected from the Brain and Under External Movement. In: Laczko, J., Latash, M. (eds) Progress in Motor Control. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 957. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47313-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics