Abstract
Motor control after spinal cord injury is strongly depending on residual ascending and descending pathways across the lesion. The individually altered neurophysiology is in general based on still intact sublesional control loops with afferent sensory inputs linked via interneuron networks to efferent motor outputs. Partial or total loss of translesional control inputs reduces and alters the ability to perform voluntary movements and results in motor incomplete (residual voluntary control of movement functions) or motor complete (no residual voluntary control) spinal cord injury classification. Of particular importance are intact functionally silent neural structures with residual brain influence but reduced state of excitability that inhibits execution of voluntary movements. The condition is described by the term discomplete spinal cord injury. There are strong evidences that artificial afferent input, e.g., by epidural or noninvasive electrical stimulation of the lumbar posterior roots, can elevate the state of excitability and thus re-enable or augment voluntary movement functions. This modality can serve as a powerful assessment technique for monitoring details of the residual function profile after spinal cord injury, as a therapeutic tool for support of restoration of movement programs and as a neuroprosthesis component augmenting and restoring movement functions, per se or in synergy with classical neuromuscular or muscular electrical stimulation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angeli CA, Edgerton VR, Gerasimenko YP, Harkema SJ (2014) Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans. Brain 137(Pt 5):1394–1409. And: Angeli C, Edgerton VR, Gerasimenko Y, Harkema SJ (2015) Reply: no dawn yet of a new age in spinal cord rehabilitation. Brain 138(Pt 7):e363
Bendersky D, Claudio Yampolsky C (2014) Is spinal cord stimulation safe? A review of its complications. World Neurosurg 82:1359–1368
Benfield J, Maknojia A, Epstein F (2016) Progressive paraplegia from spinal cord stimulator Lead fibrotic encapsulation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 95:e30–e33
Cameron T (2004) Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review. J Neurosurg: Spine 100(3):254–267
Cardenas D (2010) Spinal cord medicine, second edition: principles & practice, 2nd edn. Demos Medical Publishing. ISBN-10: 1933864192
Cioni B, Dimitrijevic MR, McKay WB, Sherwood AM (1986) Voluntary supraspinal suppression of spinal reflex activity in paralyzed muscles of spinal cord injury patients. Exp Neurol 93(3):574–583
Dimitrijevic MR (1987) Neurophysiology in spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 25(3):205–208
Dimitrijevic MR, Gerasimenko Y, Pollo FE (1997) Sustained epidural electrical stimulation of the spinalized lumbar cord in humans can facilitate or suppress spinal reflex and central pattern generator activities. In: Gurfinkel VS, Levik Yu S (eds) Proceedings of the international symposium on brain and movement, vol 60. St. Petersburg, Moscow
Dimitrijevic MR, Persy I, Forstner C, Kern H, Dimitrijevic MM (2005) Motor control in the human spinal cord. Artif Organs 29(3):216–219
Dimitrijevic, MR, Kakulas BA, McKay WB, Vrbová G (eds) (2012) Restorative neurology of spinal cord injury. Oxford University Press, NY, 336 pp. ISBN: 978-0-19-974650-7
Edgerton VR, Harkema S (2011) Epidural stimulation of the spinal cord in spinal cord injury: current status and future challenges. Expert Rev Neurother 11(10):1351–1353
Fisher LE, Miller ME, Bailey SN, Davis JA Jr, Anderson JS, Rhode L, Tyler DJ, Triolo RJ (2008) Standing after spinal cord injury with four-contact nerve-cuff electrodes for quadriceps stimulation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 16(5):473–478
Grecco LH, Li S, Michel S, Castillo-Saavedra L, Mourdoukoutas A, Bikson M, Fregni F (2015) Transcutaneous spinal stimulation as a therapeutic strategy for spinal cord injury: state of the art. J Neurorestoratology 3:73–82
Jilge B, Minassian K, Rattay F, Pinter MM, Gerstenbrand F, Binder H, Dimitrijevic MR (2004) Initiating extension of the lower limbs in subjects with complete spinal cord injury by epidural lumbar cord stimulation. Exp Brain Res 154:308–326
Kakulas BA, Bedbrook GM (1976) Injuries of the spine and spinal cord. In: Vinken PJ, Bruyn GW (eds) Handbook of clinical neurology, Chap. 3. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 27–42
Kakulas BA (1987) The clinical neuropathology of spinal cord injury. A guide to the future. Paraplegia 25(3):212–216
Sherwood AM, Dimitrijevic MR, McKay WB (1992) Evidence of subclinical brain influence in clinically complete spinal cord injury: discomplete SCI. J Neurol Sci 110(1–2):90–98
Mayr W, Bijak M, Girsch W, Holle J, Lanmüller H, Thoma H, Zrunek M (1993) Multichannel stimulation of phrenic nerves by epineural electrodes. Clinical experience and future developments. ASAIO J 39:M729–M735
Mayr W, Bijak M, Rafolt D, Sauermann S, Unger E, Lanmüller H (2001) Basic design and construction of the Vienna FES implants: existing solutions and prospects for new generations of implants. Med Eng Phys 23:53–60
Mayr W, Hofer C, Bijak M, Rafolt D, Unger E, Sauermann S, Lanmueller H, Kern H (2002) Functional electrical stimulation (FES) of denervated muscles: existing and prospective technological solutions. Basic Appl Myol 12:287
Mayr W (2015) Early and contemporary approaches for application of FES in movement rehabilitation after spinal cord injury. In: József Laczkó (ed) Progress in motor control X, Budapest July 22–25, 2015; International Society of Motor Control; Hungarian Sports Science Booklets—XII; p 43. ISBN: 978-615-5187-07-0
Minassian K, Jilge B, Rattay F, Pinter MM, Binder H, Gerstenbrand F, MR Dimitrijevic MR (2004) Stepping-like movements in humans with complete spinal cord injury induced by epidural stimulation of the lumbar cord: electromyographic study of compound muscle action potentials. Spinal Cord 42(7):401–416
Muir GD, Steeves JD (1997) Sensorimotor stimulation to improve locomotor recovery after spinal cord injury. Trends Neurosci 20(2):72–77
Nardone R, Höller Y, Taylor A, Thomschewski A, Orioli A, Frey V, Trinka E, Brigo F (2015) Noninvasive spinal cord stimulation: technical aspects and therapeutic applications. Neuromodulation 18(7):580–591 (discussion 590-1)
Ravid N, Prochazka A (2012) Nerve lesioning with direct current. In: Proceedings of 17th annual IFESS conference, Banff, Canada; pp 344–347, 9–12 Sept 2012
Rejc E, Angeli C, Harkema S (2015) Effects of lumbosacral spinal cord epidural stimulation for standing after chronic complete paralysis in humans. PLoS ONE 10(7):e0133998
Sayenko DG, Angeli C, Harkema SJ, Edgerton VR, Gerasimenko YP (2014) Neuromodulation of evoked muscle potentials induced by epidural spinal-cord stimulation in paralyzed individuals. J Neurophysiol 111(5):1088–1099
Walsh KM, Machado AG, Krishnaney AA (2015) Spinal cord stimulation: a review of the safety literature and proposal for perioperative evaluation and management. Spine J 15:1864–1869
Wernig A (2015) Response to ‘Randomised controlled trials do not always give the results we want but that doesn’t mean we should abandon randomised controlled trials’. Spinal Cord 53(12):897–898
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mayr, W., Krenn, M., Dimitrijevic, M.R. (2016). Motor Control of Human Spinal Cord Disconnected from the Brain and Under External Movement. In: Laczko, J., Latash, M. (eds) Progress in Motor Control. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 957. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47313-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47313-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47312-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47313-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)