Abstract
When estimating block grades for mining purposes, the currently available methods allow us to maximize the accuracy of either global grade and tonnage curve prediction or local block selection but not both at once. Locally accurate block estimates provide the best result during actual selection and mining but can give highly distorted global grades and tonnages at cutoffs above zero. Globally accurate block estimates provide good prediction of grade and tonnage curves but perform badly during actual selection giving much higher misclassification rates leading to serious degradation of value of the material selected for processing. These statements hold true in varying degrees for all scales and combinations of sample spacing and block size. This paper puts forward a method that retains the properties of accurate global estimation while simultaneously approaching maximum local accuracy.
The process is a simple application of rank and replace combining two estimates, one that targets local block accuracy and one that targets actual block variability. The method is empirically demonstrated using a case study using real data. The conclusion, for this data set, is that local selection accuracy can be greatly improved (but not maximized), in comparison to existing methods, while maintaining grade and tonnage curve accuracy that results from true block variability.
Comparisons with ordinary kriging, sequential Gaussian simulation, turning bands, local uniform conditioning, and ordinary kriging with reduced sample numbers are presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Abzalov M (2006) Localised Uniform Conditioning (LUC): a new approach for direct modelling of small blocks. Math Geol 38(4):93–411
Isaaks E (2005) The kriging oxymoron: a conditionally unbiased and accurate predictor (2nd edn). In: Geostatistics Banff 2004. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 363–374
Journel AG, Kyriakidis PC, Mao S (2000) Correcting the smoothing effect of estimators. Math Geol 32(7):787–813
Kentwell D (2014) Aligning resource estimates with mine planning. In: Orebody modelling and strategic mine planning. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Perth, 185–192
Krige DG (1951) A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand. J Chem Metall Min Soc S Afr 52(6):119–139
Krige DG (1994) An analysis of some essential basic tenets of geostatistics not always practiced in ore valuations. First regional APCOM, Slovenia, pp 15–28
Krige DG (1996) A basic perspective on the roles of classical statistics, data search routines, conditional biases and information and smoothing effects in ore block valuations. Conference on mining geostatistics, Kruger National Park Sept. 1994. UNISA
Richmond A, Gaze A, Horton J (2009) Desmoothing block models for underground mine design. Seventh international mining geology conference. The Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Perth, pp 265–268
Savitzky A, Golay MJ (1964) Smoothing by differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal Chem 38(8):1627–1639
Acknowledgments
The author would like to acknowledge Daniel Guibal’s contribution to the ideas behind this paper. When the author originally discussed the concept for the method with Daniel, it transpired that he had already been thinking along the same lines and suggested the much more elegant process of taking the final grades directly from the global change of support anamorphosis rather than from a simulation or degraded kriging estimate. This resulted in the Ana RR methodology detailed in this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kentwell, D.J. (2017). Approaching Simultaneous Local and Global Accuracy. In: Gómez-Hernández, J., Rodrigo-Ilarri, J., Rodrigo-Clavero, M., Cassiraga, E., Vargas-Guzmán, J. (eds) Geostatistics Valencia 2016. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46819-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46819-8_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46818-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46819-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)