Abstract
After the 2009 general elections in India a controversy started about the electronic voting machines (EVM) that are used nationwide since 2004. Political parties, activists, and academics raised suspicion that the machines might have been manipulated to alter the election outcome. There is no proof that EVMs have been manipulated in any of the past elections. However, concerned people claim that the risk is there. This paper takes a closer look at the Indian voting machine technology and the discussions around alleged security holes. The authors take a closer look at this particular controversy. Additionally, we want to provide the reader with information about the Indian electronic voting system more generally. This includes reasons to change from the earlier paper ballot system and design challenges for EVM in the Indian context. We are writing within the frame of a theoretical model called Social Construction of Technology (SCOT), developed by Wiebe Bijker and Trevor Pinch (1987). Along the lines of this model we argue that after the EVM was adopted in India, different “relevant social groups” interpreted the EVM in diverse ways. From the social constructivist perspective, we argue that there has been not just one but rather at least three different EVMs. With time the “interpretative flexibility” diminished and “relevant social groups” more or less agreed on one interpretation of the EVM. The EVM has “stabilized” and the controversy has been closed basically. We show the SCOT model to be helpful for structuring the controversy in a fruitful manner. The research questions addressed here are: How did the ECI and EVM manufacturers react to allegations made by political parties, VeTA, and voting security researchers that EVMs are vulnerable to manipulation? How was the election practice affected?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agarwala, A. K., Shahani, D. T., & Indiresan, P. V. (2006). Report of the expert committee for evaluation of the upgraded electronic voting machine (EVM). New Delhi: Election Commission of India.
Biswas, S. (2014). India’s BJP scored a historic win. BBC. Retrieved June 5, 2014, from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-27435647
Chandrashekhar, V. (2014). India’s election: Five questions on the world’s largest democracy. The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved May 29, 2014, from http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-South-Central/2014/0407/India-s-election-Five-questions-on-the-world-s-largest-democracy-video
ECI. (2009). Electronic voting machines – regarding. (PN/ECI/41/2009). New Delhi. Retrieved June 3, 2014, from http://eci.nic.in/eci_main1/current/pn080809.pdf
ECI. (2010a). A background note on investigation against Mr. Hari Prasad and others in the case of the missing EVM in Maharashtra. Retrieved June 4, 2014, from http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/recent/NOTE_HARIPRASAD.pdf
ECI. (2010b). Letter No. 51/8/16/9/2010-EMS. Retrieved May 17, 2014, from http://www.indianevm.com/evm-resources.php
ECI. (2014a). Voter turnout highlights of Lok Sabha election 2014. Retrieved June 19, 2014, from http://eci.nic.in/eci_main1/SVEEP/VoterTurnoutHighlightsLokSabha2014.pdf
ECI. (2014b). General elections – 2014: Schedule of elections. New Delhi: Election Commission of India.
ECIL. (2012–2013). 46th Annual Report 2012–13. Hyderabad: Electronics Corporation of India Limited.
GOI. (2009). General elections 2009: Reference handbook. New Delhi: Press Information Bureau. Retrieved March 23, 2014, from http://www.pibaizawl.nic.in/pr/archive/e2009/rhandbook_english.pdf
Halderman, A. (2011). Security problems in India’s electronic voting system (CRCS Lunch Seminar) [Lecture]. Boston: CRCS. Retrieved March 15, 2014, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCg3KUtkypo
Hauser, W., & Singer, W. (2001). The democratic rite: Celebration and participation in the Indian elections. In N. G. Jayal (Ed.), Democracy in India (pp. 289–310). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
IANS. (2009). Voting machines ‘manipulated’ in Orissa polls, claims Azad. Thaindian News. Retrieved May 1, 2014, from http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/politics/voting-machines-manipulated-in-orissa-polls-claims-azad_100206516.html
Jayalalitha, J., Biswas, D., Prasad, B. S. B., et al. (2010). All-party meeting to discuss Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) – Potential for manipulations – Reg. Retrieved May 29, 2014, from http://www.indianevm.com/evm-resources.php
Jha, S. K. (2009). Advani has doubts about EVM, wants ballot papers back. The Indian Express. Retrieved March 28, 2014, from http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/advani-has-doubts-about-evm-wants-ballot-papers-back/485248/
Kalita, P. (2014). An EVM that ‘votes’ only for BJP stuns poll staff in Assam. The Times of India. Retrieved May 25, 2014, from http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/news/An-EVM-that-votes-only-for-BJP-stuns-poll-staff-in-Assam/articleshow/33153152.cms?
Kumar, S., & Walia, E. (2011). Analysis of Electronic Voting System in Various Countries. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, 3(5), 1825–1830.
Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1987). The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. J. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 17–50). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Prasad, H., Halderman, A., Gonggrijp, R., Wolchock, S., Wustrow, E., et al. (2010). Security analysis of India’s electronic voting machines. Retrieved March 12, 2014, from http://indiaevm.org/evm_tr2010-jul29.pdf
Rana, M. S. (2006). India votes: Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabha elections 2001–2005. New Delhi: Sarup & Sons.
Rao, G. V. L. N. (2010). Democracy at Risk! Can we trust our electronic voting machines? New Delhi: VeTA. Retrieved March 28, 2014, from http://www.indianevm.com/book_democracy_at_risk_2010.pdf
Saini, M. (2013). Electronic voting machine: New attack vector. VIVEK: Issues and Options, (2). Retrieved May 4, 2014, from http://de.scribd.com/doc/124478041/Vivek-Issues-n-Options-February-2013
Tiwari, R., & Herstatt, C. (2012). Frugal innovation: A global network’s perspective. Die Unternehmung, 66(3), 245–274.
Tiwari, R., & Herstatt, C. (2014). Aiming big with small cars. Emergence of a lead market in India. Cham: Springer.
UNICEF. (2014). UNICEF India statistics. Retrieved May 12, 2014, from http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/india_statistics.html
VeTA. (2010). About VeTA. Retrieved May 22, 2014, from http://www.indianevm.com/about-
Acknowledgement
This paper is based on the Thesis “India’s Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs): perfect machines or a risk for democracy?” prepared by Maximilian Herstatt, handed in at the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences of Maastricht University in June 2014, which was revised in the co-authorship of Cornelius Herstatt.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Herstatt, M., Herstatt, C. (2017). India’s Electronic Voting Machines: Social Construction of a Controversy Surrounding a Frugal Innovation. In: Herstatt, C., Tiwari, R. (eds) Lead Market India. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46392-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46392-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46390-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46392-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)