Abstract
Cloud computing and cloud storage services, in particular, pose new challenges to digital forensic investigations. Currently, evidence acquisition for these services follows the traditional method of collecting artifacts residing on client devices. This approach requires labor-intensive reverse engineering effort and ultimately results in an acquisition that is inherently incomplete. Specifically, it makes the incorrect assumption that all the storage content associated with an account is fully replicated on the client. Additionally, there is no current method for acquiring historical data in the form of document revisions, nor is there a way to acquire cloud-native artifacts from targets such as Google Docs.
This chapter introduces the concept of API-based evidence acquisition for cloud services, which addresses the limitations of traditional acquisition techniques by utilizing the officially-supported APIs of the services. To demonstrate the utility of this approach, a proof-of-concept acquisition tool, kumodd, is presented. The kumodd tool can acquire evidence from four major cloud drive providers: Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox and Box. The implementation provides command-line and web user interfaces, and can be readily incorporated in established forensic processes.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chung, H., Park, J., Lee, S., Kang, C.: Digital forensic investigation of cloud storage services. Digital Investigation 9(2), 81–95 (2012)
DeFelippi, D.: Dropship (2016). github.com/driverdan/dropship
Drago, I., Bocchi, E., Mellia, M., Slatman, H., Pras, A.: Benchmarking personal cloud storage. In: Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference, pp. 205–212 (2013)
Drago, I., Mellia, M., Munafo, M., Sperotto, A., Sadre, R., Pras, A.: Inside dropbox: understanding personal cloud storage services. In: Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference, pp. 481–494 (2012)
Dropbox, Core API Best Practices, San Francisco, California (2016). www.dropbox.com/developers/core/bestpractices
ElcomSoft, ElcomSoft Cloud eXplorer, Moscow, Russia (2016). www.elcomsoft.com/ecx.html
Garfinkel, S., Nelson, A., Young, J.: A general strategy for differential forensic analysis. Digital Investigation 9(S), S50–S59 (2012)
Gartner, Gartner’s 2014 hype cycle for emerging technologies maps the journey to digital business, Stamford, Connecticut, August 11, 2014. www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2819918
Gartner, Gartner Hype Cycle, Stamford, Connecticut (2016). www.gartner.com/technology/research/methodologies/hype-cycle.jsp
Google, Drive, Mountain View, California (2016). developers.google.com/drive
Hale, J.: Amazon Cloud Drive forensic analysis. Digital Investigation 10(3), 295–265 (2013)
Huber, M., Mulazzani, M., Leithner, M., Schrittwieser, S., Wondracek, G., Weippl, E.: Social snapshots: digital forensics for online social networks. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, pp. 113–122 (2011)
Martini, B., Choo, R.: Cloud storage forensics: ownCloud as a case study. Digital Investigation 10(4), 287–299 (2013)
Mell, P., Grance, T.: The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing, NIST Special Publication 800–145, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland (2011)
Orland, K.: Dropbox clarifies its policy on reviewing shared files for DMCA issues, Ars Technica, March 30, 2014
Quick, D., Choo, R.: Dropbox analysis: Data remnants on user machines. Digital Investigation 10(1), 3–18 (2013)
Quick, D., Choo, R.: Google Drive: Forensic analysis of data remnants. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 40, 179–193 (2014)
RightScale, RightScale 2015 State of the Cloud Report, Santa Barbara, California (2015). assets.rightscale.com/uploads/pdfs/RightScale-2015-State-of-the-Cloud-Report.pdf
Roussev, V., McCulley, S.: Forensic analysis of cloud-native artifacts. Digital Investigation 16(S), S104–S113 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Roussev, V., Barreto, A., Ahmed, I. (2016). API-Based Forensic Acquisition of Cloud Drives. In: Peterson, G., Shenoi, S. (eds) Advances in Digital Forensics XII. DigitalForensics 2016. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 484. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46279-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46279-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46278-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46279-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)