Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interactive Digital Cardwalls for Agile Software Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Collaboration Meets Interactive Spaces

  • 824 Accesses

Abstract

Agile software development is characterized by very intensive communication and collaboration among members of the software development team and external stakeholders. In this context, we look specifically at cardwalls, noting that despite the wide availability of digital cardwalls, most Agile teams still use physical cardwalls to support their collaborative events. This is true even though a physical cardwall hinders efficient distributed software development and causes extra effort to capture story artefacts into digital tools to meet traceability and persistence requirements. We conducted two empirical studies in industry to understand the use of existing digital Agile cardwalls and to find out the needs for an ideal digital Agile cardwall. The first study was with eight Agile teams of committed digital cardwall users. The study showed the reasons why some teams use projected digital cardwalls and their detailed experiences with them. The study showed that most digital cardwalls seem not be sufficient for the highly interactive and collaborative Agile workstyle. The second study was with eleven Agile companies. The study comprised of the development of aWall, a software prototype of a large interactive high-resolution multi-touch display that supports varied Agile meetings where cardwalls are used. The results of the study emerged with design considerations for digital Agile cardwalls from the evaluation of aWall in a user workshop. Both studies, which were conducted concurrently, began with an interest in new large interactive surface technologies which might have the potential to provide not only the required interaction possibilities to support intensive collaboration, but also the required large display format necessary for a collaborative space. The results of the studies collectively seem to confirm our assumption, that large interactive surface technologies could bring the support for the collaboration of Agile teams to a new level, potentially making the teams more productive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://multitouch.com/.

  2. 2.

    http://interactjs.io.

  3. 3.

    All quotes have been translated from German.

References

  1. Agile Manifesto. Web, March 2016. http://agilemanifesto.org/

  2. Kropp M, Meier A, Biddle R (2016) Agile adolescence to maturity: experience leads to collaboration. Presented at OOP Conference, Munich, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  3. Whitworth E, Biddle R (2007) The social nature of agile teams. In: Proceedings of the Agile software development conference, Washington D.C. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  4. Azizyan G, Magarian MK, Kajko-Matsson M (2011) Survey of Agile tool usage and needs. In: Agile conference (AGILE), 2011, pp 29–38

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sharp H, Robinson H, Petre M (2009) The role of physical artefacts in agile software development. Interdisc J Human-Comput Interac 21(1–2)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas RG (1996) Green and Marian Petre. Usability analysis of visual programming environments: A ‘cognitive dimensions’ framework. J Visual Lang Comput 7(2):131–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cockburn A (2006) Agile software development: the cooperative game, second edition. Addison-Wesley Professional

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beck K (1999) Extreme programming explained. Addison-Wesley Professional

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fog Creek Software (2016) Trello. Web, Feb 2016. http://trello.com/

  10. Atlassian (2016) JIRA. Web, Feb 2016. http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

  11. Wang X (2009) Using digital tabletops to support agile project planning. Master’s thesis, University of Calgary, Department of Computer Science, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, September 2009

    Google Scholar 

  12. Weber S, Ghanam Y, Wang X, Maurer F (2008) Apdt- an agile planning tool for digital tabletops. In: Proceedings 9th international conference on agile processes and eXtreme programming in software engineering (XP2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Morgan RE (2008) Distributed agile planner: a card-based planning environment for agile teams. Master’s thesis, University of Calgary, Department of Computer Science, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smart Technologies (2010) Digital vision touch. http://www.smarttech.com/

  15. Schöning J, Brandl P, Daiber F, Echtler F, Hilliges O, Hook J, Lchtefeld M, Motamedi N, Muller L, Olivier P, Roth T, von Zadow U (2008) Multi-touch surfaces: a technical guide. Technical Report TUM-I0833, University of Munster, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gossage Stevenson (2010) CMAP: a collaborative multitouch Agile planner. University of Carleton, School of Computer Science, Honours project

    Google Scholar 

  17. Scott SD, Grant KD, Mandryk RL (2003) System guidelines for co-located, collaborative work on a tabletop display. In: Proceedings of the eighth conference on european conference on computer supported cooperative work, ECSCW’03, Norwell, MA, USA, 2003. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 159–178

    Google Scholar 

  18. PyMt.eu. PyMt, Multitouch Framework. http://pymt.eu, December 2010

  19. Esbensen M, Tell P, Cholewa JB, Pedersen MK, Bardram J (2015) The dboard: a digital scrum board for distributed software development. In: Proceedings of the ACM international conference on interactive tabletops and surfaces (ITS). ACM, pp 161–170

    Google Scholar 

  20. Anslow C, Marshall S, Noble J, Biddle R (2013) SourceVis: collaborative software visualization for co-located environments. In: Proceedings of the international working conference on software visualization (VISSOFT). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bragdon A, DeLine R, Hinckley K, Morris MR (2011) Code space: touch+air gesture hybrid interactions for supporting developer meetings. In: Proceedings of the ACM international conference on interactive tabletops and surfaces (ITS). ACM, pp 212–221

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gossage S, Brown JM, Biddle R (2015) Understanding digital cardwall usage. In: Agile conference (AGILE), 2015. IEEE, pp 21–30

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bernard HR (2011) Research methods in anthropology. AltaMira Press

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lofland J (2006) Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis, chapter 5. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, 4th edition, pp 81–116

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sanjek Roger (1990) Fieldnotes: the makings of anthropology. J Hist Behav Sci 28(3):274–276

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fontana A, Frey JH (1994) Interviewing: the art of science. SAGE Publications, pp 361–376

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rubin HJ, Rubin I (1995) Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data, chapter 5. Sage Publications, pp 93–121

    Google Scholar 

  28. Smith JA (1995) Rethinking methods in psychology, chapter 2. Thousand Oaks, pp 9–26

    Google Scholar 

  29. Corbin J, Strauss A (2008) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gubrium JF, Sankar A (1994) Qualitative methods in aging research, vol 168, chapter 12. SAGE Publications, pp 189–210

    Google Scholar 

  31. De Almeida RA, Pillias C, Pietriga E, Cubaud P (2012) Looking behind bezels: French windows for wall displays. In: Proceedings of the international working conference on advanced visual interfaces, AVI ’12, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM, pp 124–131

    Google Scholar 

  32. Endert A, Bradel L, Zeitz J, Andrews C, North C (2012) Designing large high-resolution display workspaces. In: Proceedings of the international working conference on advanced visual interfaces, AVI ’12, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM, pp 58–65

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jagodic R (2011) Collaborative interaction and display space organization in large high-resolution environments. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA, 2011. AAI3551257

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jagodic Ratko, Renambot Luc, Johnson Andrew, Leigh Jason, Deshpande Sachin (2011) Enabling multi-user interaction in large high-resolution distributed environments. Future Gener Comput Syst 27(7):914–923 July

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jakobsen MR, Haile YS, Knudsen S, Hornbæk K (2013) Information visualization and proxemics: design opportunities and empirical findings. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 19(12):2386–2395

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yost Beth, North Chris (2006) The perceptual scalability of visualization. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 12(5):837–844 Sept

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shneiderman B (1996) The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In: Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE symposium on visual languages, VL ’96, Washington, DC, USA, 1996. IEEE Computer Society, p 336

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mateescu M, Kropp M, Greiwe S, Burkhard R, Vischi D, Zahn C (2015) Erfolgreiche zusammenarbeit in agilen teams: Eine schweizer interview-studie ber kommunikation, 22 Dec 2015. http://www.swissagilestudy.ch/studies

  39. Mateescu M, Kropp M, Burkhard R, Zahn C, Vischier D (2015) awall: a socio-cognitive tool for agile team collaboration using large multi-touch wall systems. In: Proceedings of the ACM international conference on interactive tabletops and surfaces (ITS). ACM, pp 361–366

    Google Scholar 

  40. Beck Kent, Cunningham Ward (1989) A laboratory for teaching object oriented thinking. ACM Sigplan Notices 24(10):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland, Windisch, Switzerland

    Martin Kropp & Magdalena Mateescu

  2. School of Computer Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada

    Judith M. Brown, Stevenson Gossage & Robert Biddle

  3. Department of Computer Science, Middlesex University, London, UK

    Craig Anslow

Authors
  1. Martin Kropp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Judith M. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Craig Anslow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stevenson Gossage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Magdalena Mateescu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Robert Biddle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Kropp .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, Middlesex University , London, United Kingdom

    Craig Anslow

  2. Madeira Interactive Technologies Institute, University of Madeira , Funchal, Reg. Aut. da Madeira, Portugal

    Pedro Campos

  3. Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon , Lisbon, Portugal

    Joaquim Jorge

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kropp, M., Brown, J.M., Anslow, C., Gossage, S., Mateescu, M., Biddle, R. (2016). Interactive Digital Cardwalls for Agile Software Development. In: Anslow, C., Campos, P., Jorge, J. (eds) Collaboration Meets Interactive Spaces. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45853-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45853-3_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45852-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45853-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation