Abstract
As the contemporary art scene expands outwards with the financial intervention of the corporate sector, the underground cultural activities, experimental communities, and anti-establishment art spaces resist the systematization of the corporate logic. With what has been described as a “social turn of art,” we witness a shift in art’s engagement with politics, from igniting critical awakening in society to creating communal and egalitarian relations in the public spaces. Hence, the social, political, as well as aesthetic viability of these practices are often questioned. The tension between political activism and artistic representation still persists in the century-old paradox: aestheticization of politics that leads to spectacularization of art to make political ideologies attractive, and politicization of aesthetics that strips art of its autonomy, thus its power to operate as a creative process. Both views place art and politics in two different spheres that intersect and interact in desirable but dysfunctional ways. This article discusses that art is not trapped in the paradox between the aestheticization of politics and politicization of aesthetics; it finds its radical meaning and function in this position.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Adorno, Theodor W. Aesthetic Theory. Translated by Robert Hullot-Kentor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.
Bishop, Claire. “The Social Turn: Collaboration and Its Discontent.” Artforum 44 (2006):178–183.
Graeber, David. “On the Phenomenology of Giant Puppets: Broken Windows, Imaginary Jars of Urine, and the Cosmological Role of the Police in American Culture.” In Possibilities: Essays on Hierarchy, Rebellion and Desire, edited by David Graeber. Oakland, CA: AK Press, 2007.
Grindon, Gavin. “Surrealism, Dada and the Refusal of Work: Autonomy, Activism, and Social Participation in the Radical Avant-Garde.” Oxford Art Journal 34 (2011):79–96.
Groys, Boris. “On Art Activism” E-Flux Journal #56. Accessed January 18, 2016. Http://www.e-flux.com/journal/on-art-activism/.
Rancière, Jacques. “Contemporary Art and the Politics of Aesthetics” in Communities of Sense: Rethinking Aesthetics and Politics, edited by Beth Hinderliter, Vared Maimon, Jaleh Mansoor and Seth Mc Cormic. Durham: Duke University Press, 2009.
Rancière, Jacques. The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. Translated by Gabriel Rockhill. London, New York: Continuum, 2004.
Papadopoulos, Dimitris. “Dialectics of Subjectivity: North-Atlantic Certainties, Neo-liberal Rationality and Liberation Promises.” International Journal of Critical Psychology 6 (2002): 99–122.
Pleyers, Geoffrey. Alter-globalization: Becoming Actors in the Global Age. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity, 2010.
Stephen, Lynn. We Are the Face of Oaxaca: Testimony and Social Movements. Durham: Duke University Press, 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tunalı, T. (2017). The Paradoxical Engagement of Contemporary Art with Activism and Protest. In: Bonham-Carter, C., Mann, N. (eds) Rhetoric, Social Value and the Arts. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45297-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45297-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45296-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45297-5
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)