Skip to main content

Rethinking the Social Responsibilities of Engineers as a Form of Accountability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philosophy and Engineering

Part of the book series: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology ((POET,volume 26))

Abstract

Although there is broad consensus that engineers have social responsibilities, what is owed in the name of social responsibility is not well understood. After briefly reviewing past attempts to understand the social responsibilities of engineers, an account that treats these responsibilities as a form of accountability is sketched. Accountability involves a relationship between an actor and a forum, a shared sense of obligation to explain and justify behavior, and shared norms regarding what needs to be explained, what counts as an adequate explanation, and what consequences might follow. Framing the social responsibilities of engineers as accountability brings to light the multiple actors involved and the activities by which social responsibilities are constituted. Among other things, the account locates the social responsibilities of engineers in the activities of engineering professional organizations, especially when they issue reports on engineering failures. The account also points to the importance of whistleblowing. The idea that social responsibility falls to individual engineers regardless of context or that social responsibility is a decontextualized moral matter is eschewed in favor of understanding engineers’ social responsibilities as constituted through social practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This distinction between engineering organizational activity and the behavior of individual engineers is one aspect of Herkert’s (2001) distinction between macro and micro ethical issues in engineering.

References

  • Alpern, K. (1983). The moral responsibility of engineers in large organizations. Business & professional ethics journal, 22, 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European law journal, 13(4), 447–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1991). Thinking like an engineer. Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions at IIT. Found at: http://ethics.iit.edu/publication/md_te.html. Accessed on 6 Feb 2015.

  • Frodeman, R., & Mitcham, C. (2000). Beyond the social contract myth. Issues in Science and Technology, 16(4), 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, A., & Aarne Vesiland, P. (2003). Hold paramount: The engineer’s responsibility to society. Pacific Grove: Thompson Learning Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. E., Jr. (2008). The good engineer: Giving virtue its due in engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(2), 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A. (1968). Punishment and responsibility: Essays in the philosophy of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herkert, J. R. (2001). Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(3), 403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. G. (1992). Do engineers have social responsibilities? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 9(1), 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, W. D. (2004). Professionalism: The golden years. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 130(1), 26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manion, M., & Evan, W. M. (2000). The Y2K problem and professional responsibility: A retrospective analysis. Technology in Society, 22(3), 361–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J. A. (2014). Changing the paradigm for engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(4), 985–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stieb, J. A. (2011). Understanding engineering professionalism: A reflection on the rights of engineers. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(1), 149–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stovall, P. (2011). Professional virtue and professional self-awareness: A case study in engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(1), 109–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (2009, June). Performance Evaluation of the New Orleans and Southeast Louisiana Hurricane Protection System. Accessed at: http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/katrina/ipet/Volume%20I%20FINAL%2023Jun09%20mh.pdf on 2 Feb 2015.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah G. Johnson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johnson, D.G. (2017). Rethinking the Social Responsibilities of Engineers as a Form of Accountability. In: Michelfelder, D., Newberry, B., Zhu, Q. (eds) Philosophy and Engineering. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45193-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics