Skip to main content

Towards Better 3D Model Accuracy with Spherical Photogrammetry

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Rise of Big Spatial Data

Abstract

Spherical photogrammetry (SP) is an efficient method in 3D model acquisition. The SP method is fast, low cost, and the resulting of 3D model is reliable. SP has many advantages, but it also has many disadvantages. Since it uses panoramic images as the basic information, significant distortion within the panoramic image causes the accuracy of the 3D model to be less accurate. These distortions need to be corrected and one way to correct and reduce the distortion effect is by performing camera calibration through laboratory calibration and self-calibration. In previous research, self-calibration actually had been performed without laboratory calibration, but there is still miss stitching and alignment in the high resolution panoramic image (Brown and Lowe in Int J Comput Vision 74(1):59–73, 2007). Laboratory calibration and self-calibration are procedures which aims to determine the lens distortion parameters, such as radial and tangential distortion, as well as the interior camera parameters, such as focal length and the principle point of photos. All parameters are used to correct the distorted images. Thus, this research tries to perform laboratory calibration together with self-calibration. Different scenarios are made, and the result shows that the laboratory calibration and self-calibration corrects panoramic image distortion and lowers the standard deviation of the panoramic image stitching process. Although the laboratory calibration and self-calibration shows better results in the panoramic image stitching process, the corrected panoramic image does not affect the 3D model reconstruction accuracy significantly. The accuracy is rather affected by the photogrammetric network design, which significantly influences the panoramic image projection distortion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atkinson K (1998) Close range photogrammetry and machine vision. Whittles Publishing, Scotland

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown M, Lowe DG (2003) Recognising panoramas. ICCV, Nice, pp 1218–1225

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown M, Lowe DG (2007) Automatic panoramic image stitching using invariant features. Int J Comput Vision 74(1):59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannelle B, Paparoditis N, Tournaire O (2010) Panorama-based camera calibration. International archives of photogrammetry, remote sensing and the spatial sciences. vol XXXVIII, Part 3A, pp 73–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung-Ching L, Pankanti SU, Ramamurthy KN, Aravkin AY (2015) Adaptive as-natural-as-possible image stitching. In: Computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), IEEE, pp 1155–1163

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen A, Zach C, Sinha SN, Pollefeys M (2012) Discovering and exploiting 3D symmetries in structure from motion. In: IEEE computer society, pp 1514–1521

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Annibale E, Tassetti A, Malinverni E (2013) From panoramic photos to a low-cost photogrammetric workflow for cultural heritage 3D documentation. International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, vol XL-5/W2, pp 213–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Fangi G (2015) Towards an easier orientation for spherical photogrammetry. International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, vol XL-5/W4, pp 279–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng L, Yu-hen H, Gleicher ML (2008) Discovering panoramas in web videos. In: 16th ACM international conference on multimedia, pp 329–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur J, Baregar AJ (2013) Security using image processing. Int J Manag Inf Technol 5(2):13–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatek K, Tokarczyk R (2015) Immersive photogrammetry in 3D modelling. Geomat Environ Eng 9(2):51–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikhail EM, Bethel JS, McGlone JC (2001) Introduction of modern photogrammetry. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Olague G (2002) Automated photogrammetric network design. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 68(5):423–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Peleg S, Ben-Ezra M, Pritch Y (2001) Omnistereo: panoramic stereo imaging. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 23(3):279–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez M, Agüera F, Carvajal F (2011) Digital camera calibration using images taken from an unmanned aerial vehicle. International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, vol XXXVIII-1/C22, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Remondino F, El-Hakim S (2006) Image-based 3D modelling: a review. Photogram Rec 21(115):269–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remondino F, Fraser C (2006) Digital camera calibration methods: considerations and comparisons. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and the Spatial Sciences, vol XXXVI, Part 5, pp 266–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Saadat-Seresht M, Samdzadegana F, Azizi A, Hahn M (2004) Camera placement for network design in vision metrology. International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, vol XXXV-B5, pp 105–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangle P, Kutty K, Patil A (2011) A novel approach for generation of panoramic view. Int J Comput Sci Inf Technol 2(2):804–807

    Google Scholar 

  • Shum HY, Szeliski R (2000) Construction of panoramic. Int J Comput Vision 36(2):101–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieberth T, Wackrow R, Chandler JH (2014) Influence of blur on feature matching and a geometric approach for photogrammetric deblurring. International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, vol XL-3, pp 321–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Tommaselli AMG, Junior JM, Telles SSS (2012) Camera calibration using straight lines: assessment of a model based on plane equivalence. Photogramm J Finl 23(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf PR (1983) Elements of photogrammetry. McGraw-Hill, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiaohui W, Kehe W, Shengzhuang W (2013) Research on panoramic image registration approach based on spherical model. Int J Signal Process Image Process Pattern Recognit 6(6):297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Handoko Pramulyo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pramulyo, H., Harto, A.B., Mertotaroeno, S.H., Murtiyoso, A. (2017). Towards Better 3D Model Accuracy with Spherical Photogrammetry. In: Ivan, I., Singleton, A., Horák, J., Inspektor, T. (eds) The Rise of Big Spatial Data. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45123-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics