Abstract
Researchers widely agree that how children spend their time is an important predictor of the development of their skills, relationships, attitudes, and behavior patterns. And while media estimates indicate that media play a considerable presence in the daily life of most youngsters today, media use estimates in the absence of context present an incomplete picture. Not only can the context of media use influence whether or not media are consumed, but context can also influence the experience and subsequent effects of such media content. Despite this, media context is inconsistently investigated in children’s media research. To help address this gap, this study evaluated young Dutch children’s media use through the contours of one context variable—parental media mediation. Working with parent-report data from a sample of children 3–8 years old, results of this study support the argument that context matters. Not only is the type of parental mediation (restrictive, active) associated with different types of media use, but the style of mediation is also differentially associated with media use. Perhaps most notably, not only were children more likely to consume greater amounts of educational media content when their parents actively encouraged such content (as well as consume less violent content), but the effect size of these relationships was the largest among all of the relationships discovered in this study. Such findings have important implications for future research as well as for the messages that we share with parents about managing media at home.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Preliminary models also examined potential interactions with age to identify whether the relationship between parental mediation and media use may vary as a function by age. Although some interactions were significant, no meaningful differences emerged. For model parsimony and to aid interpretation, age was treated as a covariate in final analytic models.
References
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., pp. 993–1028; 17). New York: Wiley.
Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21, 323–343. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.x.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Fikkers, K. M., Piotrowski, J. T., Lugtig, P., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). The role of perceived peer norms in the relationship between media violence exposure and adolescents’ aggression. Media Psychology, 19, 4–26. doi:10.1080/15213269.2015.1037960.
Fikkers, K. M., Piotrowski, J. T., Weeda, W. D., Vossen, H. G. M., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2013). Double dose: High family conflict enhances the effect of media violence exposure on adolescents’ aggression. Societies, 3, 280–292. doi:10.3390/soc3030280.
Fikkers, K. M., Piotrowski, J. T., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). Assessing the reliability and validity of television and game violence exposure measures. Communication Research. doi:10.1177/0093650215573863.
Fujioka, Y., & Austin, E. W. (2003). The implications of vantage point in parental mediation of television and child’s attitudes toward drinking alcohol. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 418–434. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4703_6.
Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., Signorielli, N., & Shanahan, J. (2002). Growing up with television: Cultivation processes. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 43–67). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Huston, A. C., & Wright, J. C. (1994). Educating children with television: The forms of the medium. In D. Zillman, J. Bryant, & A. C. Huston (Eds.), Media, children, and the family: Social scientific, psychodynamic, and clinical perspectives (pp. 73–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Huston, A. C., Wright, J. C., Marquis, J., & Green, S. B. (1999). How young children spend their time: Television and other activities. Developmental Psychology, 35(4), 912–925. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.4.912.
Juster, F. T., & Stafford, F. P. (1991). The allocation of time: Empirical findings, behavioral models, and problems of measurement. Journal of Economic Literature, 29(2), 471–522.
Krcmar, M., & Cingel, D. (2015). Examining two models of parent mediation of adolescent social media use. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Larson, R., & Verman, S. (1999). How children and adolescents spend time across the world: Work, play, and developmental opportunities. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 701–736. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.701.
Nathanson, A. (1999). Identifying and explaining the relationship between parental mediation and children’s aggression. Communication Research, 26, 124–143. doi:10.1177/009365099026002002.
Nathanson, A. (2001a). Parent and child perspectives on the presence and meaning of parental television mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45, 201–220. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4502_1.
Nathanson, A. (2001b). Parents versus peers: Exploring the significance of peer mediation of antisocial television. Communication Research, 28(3), 251–274.
Nathanson, A. (2004). Factual and evaluative approaches to modifying children’s responses to violent television. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 321–336. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02631.x.
Newson, R. (2002). Parameters behind “nonparametric” statistics: Kendall’s tau, somers’ D and median differences. The Stata Journal, 2, 45–64.
Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2006). Parental mediation of children's videogame playing: A comparison of reports by parents and children. Learning, Media, and Technology, 31, 181–202. doi:10.1080/17439880600756803.
Piotrowski, J. T., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). Finding orchids in a field of dandelions: Understanding children's differential susceptibility to media effects. American Behavioral Scientist, 59, 1776–1789. doi:10.1177/0002764215596552.
Smetana, J. G. (1995). Parenting styles and conceptions of parental authority during adolescence. Child Development, 66, 299–316. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00872.x.
Sneed, C., & Runco, M. A. (1992). The beliefs adults and children hold about television and video games. The Journal of Psychology, 126(3), 273–284. doi:10.1080/00223980.1992.10543361.
Valkenburg, P. M., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A. L., & Marseille, N. (1999). Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: “Instructive mediation”, “restrictive mediation”, and “social coviewing”. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43(1), 52–66. doi:10.1080/08838159909364474.
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63, 221–243. doi:10.1111/jcom.12024.
Valkenburg, P. M., Piotrowski, J. T., Hermanns, J., & de Leeuw, R. (2013). Developing and validating the perceived parental media mediation scale: A self-determination perspective. Human Communication Research, 39, 445–469. doi:10.1111/hcre.12010.
Acknowledgements
The research reported in this chapter is supported by a grant to Professor Patti Valkenburg from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013)/ERC grant agreement no [AdG09 249488-ENTCHILD]. Special thanks to Professor Valkenburg for her comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript, and to the research team involved with the study design and data collection—especially Helen Vossen, Karin Fikkers, Sanne Nikkelen, Maria Koutamanis, and TNS-NIPO.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Piotrowski, J.T. (2017). The Parental Media Mediation Context of Young Children’s Media Use. In: Barr, R., Linebarger, D. (eds) Media Exposure During Infancy and Early Childhood. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45102-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45102-2_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45100-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45102-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)