Skip to main content

The Parental Media Mediation Context of Young Children’s Media Use

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Media Exposure During Infancy and Early Childhood

Abstract

Researchers widely agree that how children spend their time is an important predictor of the development of their skills, relationships, attitudes, and behavior patterns. And while media estimates indicate that media play a considerable presence in the daily life of most youngsters today, media use estimates in the absence of context present an incomplete picture. Not only can the context of media use influence whether or not media are consumed, but context can also influence the experience and subsequent effects of such media content. Despite this, media context is inconsistently investigated in children’s media research. To help address this gap, this study evaluated young Dutch children’s media use through the contours of one context variable—parental media mediation. Working with parent-report data from a sample of children 3–8 years old, results of this study support the argument that context matters. Not only is the type of parental mediation (restrictive, active) associated with different types of media use, but the style of mediation is also differentially associated with media use. Perhaps most notably, not only were children more likely to consume greater amounts of educational media content when their parents actively encouraged such content (as well as consume less violent content), but the effect size of these relationships was the largest among all of the relationships discovered in this study. Such findings have important implications for future research as well as for the messages that we share with parents about managing media at home.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Preliminary models also examined potential interactions with age to identify whether the relationship between parental mediation and media use may vary as a function by age. Although some interactions were significant, no meaningful differences emerged. For model parsimony and to aid interpretation, age was treated as a covariate in final analytic models.

References

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., pp. 993–1028; 17). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21, 323–343. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fikkers, K. M., Piotrowski, J. T., Lugtig, P., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). The role of perceived peer norms in the relationship between media violence exposure and adolescents’ aggression. Media Psychology, 19, 4–26. doi:10.1080/15213269.2015.1037960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fikkers, K. M., Piotrowski, J. T., Weeda, W. D., Vossen, H. G. M., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2013). Double dose: High family conflict enhances the effect of media violence exposure on adolescents’ aggression. Societies, 3, 280–292. doi:10.3390/soc3030280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fikkers, K. M., Piotrowski, J. T., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). Assessing the reliability and validity of television and game violence exposure measures. Communication Research. doi:10.1177/0093650215573863.

  • Fujioka, Y., & Austin, E. W. (2003). The implications of vantage point in parental mediation of television and child’s attitudes toward drinking alcohol. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 418–434. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4703_6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., Signorielli, N., & Shanahan, J. (2002). Growing up with television: Cultivation processes. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 43–67). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, A. C., & Wright, J. C. (1994). Educating children with television: The forms of the medium. In D. Zillman, J. Bryant, & A. C. Huston (Eds.), Media, children, and the family: Social scientific, psychodynamic, and clinical perspectives (pp. 73–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, A. C., Wright, J. C., Marquis, J., & Green, S. B. (1999). How young children spend their time: Television and other activities. Developmental Psychology, 35(4), 912–925. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.4.912.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Juster, F. T., & Stafford, F. P. (1991). The allocation of time: Empirical findings, behavioral models, and problems of measurement. Journal of Economic Literature, 29(2), 471–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krcmar, M., & Cingel, D. (2015). Examining two models of parent mediation of adolescent social media use. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, San Juan, Puerto Rico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R., & Verman, S. (1999). How children and adolescents spend time across the world: Work, play, and developmental opportunities. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 701–736. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nathanson, A. (1999). Identifying and explaining the relationship between parental mediation and children’s aggression. Communication Research, 26, 124–143. doi:10.1177/009365099026002002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathanson, A. (2001a). Parent and child perspectives on the presence and meaning of parental television mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45, 201–220. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4502_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathanson, A. (2001b). Parents versus peers: Exploring the significance of peer mediation of antisocial television. Communication Research, 28(3), 251–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathanson, A. (2004). Factual and evaluative approaches to modifying children’s responses to violent television. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 321–336. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02631.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newson, R. (2002). Parameters behind “nonparametric” statistics: Kendall’s tau, somers’ D and median differences. The Stata Journal, 2, 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2006). Parental mediation of children's videogame playing: A comparison of reports by parents and children. Learning, Media, and Technology, 31, 181–202. doi:10.1080/17439880600756803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piotrowski, J. T., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). Finding orchids in a field of dandelions: Understanding children's differential susceptibility to media effects. American Behavioral Scientist, 59, 1776–1789. doi:10.1177/0002764215596552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, J. G. (1995). Parenting styles and conceptions of parental authority during adolescence. Child Development, 66, 299–316. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00872.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sneed, C., & Runco, M. A. (1992). The beliefs adults and children hold about television and video games. The Journal of Psychology, 126(3), 273–284. doi:10.1080/00223980.1992.10543361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg, P. M., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A. L., & Marseille, N. (1999). Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: “Instructive mediation”, “restrictive mediation”, and “social coviewing”. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43(1), 52–66. doi:10.1080/08838159909364474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63, 221–243. doi:10.1111/jcom.12024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg, P. M., Piotrowski, J. T., Hermanns, J., & de Leeuw, R. (2013). Developing and validating the perceived parental media mediation scale: A self-determination perspective. Human Communication Research, 39, 445–469. doi:10.1111/hcre.12010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research reported in this chapter is supported by a grant to Professor Patti Valkenburg from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013)/ERC grant agreement no [AdG09 249488-ENTCHILD]. Special thanks to Professor Valkenburg for her comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript, and to the research team involved with the study design and data collection—especially Helen Vossen, Karin Fikkers, Sanne Nikkelen, Maria Koutamanis, and TNS-NIPO.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Taylor Piotrowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Piotrowski, J.T. (2017). The Parental Media Mediation Context of Young Children’s Media Use. In: Barr, R., Linebarger, D. (eds) Media Exposure During Infancy and Early Childhood. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45102-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics