Abstract
The purpose of an interspinous device is to distract adjacent spinous processes, thus producing flexion and limiting extension of that spine level. Interspinous devices can be designed for motion preservation or for fusion, and the device insertion is minimally invasive. The North American Spine Society (NASS) and the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery (ISSAS) have provided indications and contraindications for the use of interspinous devices, with careful patient selection being paramount. The patient is typically placed in a prone position, and the interspinous device is inserted between the adjacent spinous processes to hold the spine in a slightly kyphotic position, thus increasing the canal diameter and reducing symptoms of neurogenic claudication. Complications, complication rates, and reoperation rates have been reported in a large retrospective study and in review articles. Complications can result from the design or intrinsic purpose of the device, incorrect surgical indications or patient selection, or incorrect device sizing. Outcomes of interspinous devices and how their outcomes compare with the outcomes of nonoperative treatment, bony decompression alone, and instrumented fusion have been reported.
References
Bonaldi G, Bertolini G, Marrocu A, Cianfoni A (2012) Posterior vertebral arch cement augmentation (spinoplasty) to prevent fracture of spinous processes after interspinous spacer implant. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33(3):522–528. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2792
Bonaldi G, Brembilla C, Cianfoni A (2015) Minimally-invasive posterior lumbar stabilization for degenerative low back pain and sciatica. A review. Eur J Radiol 84(5):789–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.04.012
Bono CM, Vaccaro AR (2007) Interspinous process devices in the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 20(3):255–261. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180331352
Borg A, Nurboja B, Timothy J, Choi D (2012) Interspinous distractor devices for the management of lumbar spinal stenosis: a miracle cure for a common problem? Br J Neurosurg 26(4):445–449. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2012.680630
Gala RJ, Russo GS, Whang PG (2017) Interspinous implants to treat spinal stenosis. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 10(2):182–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-017-9413-8
Gazzeri R, Galarza M, Alfieri A (2014) Controversies about interspinous process devices in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases: past, present, and future. Biomed Res Int 2014:975052. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/975052
Gazzeri R, Galarza M, Neroni M, Fiore C, Faiola A, Puzzilli F, Callovini G, Alfieri A (2015) Failure rates and complications of interspinous process decompression devices: a European multicenter study. Neurosurg Focus 39(4):E14. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.7.Focus15244
Gonzalez-Blohm SA, Doulgeris JJ, Aghayev K, Lee WE 3rd, Volkov A, Vrionis FD (2014) Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine 20(2):209–219. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.10.Spine13612
Guyer R, Musacchio M, Cammisa FP Jr, Lorio MP (2016) ISASS recommendations/coverage criteria for decompression with interlaminar stabilization – coverage indications, limitations, and/or medical necessity. Int J Spine Surg 10:41. https://doi.org/10.14444/3041
Kim DH, Albert TJ (2007) Interspinous process spacers. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15(4):200–207
Lee SH, Seol A, Cho TY, Kim SY, Kim DJ, Lim HM (2015) A systematic review of interspinous dynamic stabilization. Clin Orthop Surg 7(3):323–329. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2015.7.3.323
Li M, Yang H, Wang G (2017) Interspinous process devices for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Neurosurg Rev 40(4):529–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-016-0722-y
Maida G, Marcati E, Sarubbo S (2012) Heterotopic ossification in vertebral interlaminar/interspinous instrumentation: report of a case. Case reports in surgery 2012:970642. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/970642
Moojen WA, Arts MP, Bartels RH, Jacobs WC, Peul WC (2011) Effectiveness of interspinous implant surgery in patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 20(10):1596–1606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1873-8
NASS Coverage Committee (2014a) NASS coverage policy recommendations: interspinous fixation with fusion. Retrieved from https://www.spine.org/PolicyPractice/CoverageRecommendations/AboutCoverageRecommendations#currentcoverage
NASS Coverage Committee (2014b) NASS coverage policy recommendations: interspinous fixation without fusion. Retrieved from https://www.spine.org/PolicyPractice/CoverageRecommendations/AboutCoverageRecommendations#currentcoverage
NASS Coverage Committee (2018) NASS coverage policy recommendations: lumbar interspinous device without fusion and with decompression. Retrieved from: https://www.spine.org/PolicyPractice/CoverageRecommendations/AboutCoverageRecommendations#currentcoverage
Parchi PD, Evangelisti G, Vertuccio A, Piolanti N, Andreani L, Cervi V, Giannetti C, Calvosa G, Lisanti M (2014) Biomechanics of interspinous devices. Biomed Res Int 2014:839325. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/839325
Phan K, Rao PJ, Ball JR, Mobbs RJ (2016) Interspinous process spacers versus traditional decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Spine Surg 2(1):31–40. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2016.01.07
Pintauro M, Duffy A, Vahedi P, Rymarczuk G, Heller J (2017) Interspinous implants: are the new implants better than the last generation? A review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 10(2):189–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-017-9401-z
Ravindra VM, Ghogawala Z (2017) Is there still a role for interspinous spacers in the management of neurogenic claudication? Neurosurg Clin N Am 28(3):321–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2017.02.002
Serhan H, Mhatre D, Defossez H, Bono CM (2011) Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: the past, present, and future horizons. SAS J 5(3):75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2011.05.001
Siewe J, Selbeck M, Koy T, Rollinghoff M, Eysel P, Zarghooni K, Oppermann J, Herren C, Sobottke R (2015) Indications and contraindications: interspinous process decompression devices in lumbar spine surgery. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 76(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1382779
Tian NF, Wu AM, Wu LJ, Wu XL, Wu YS, Zhang XL, Xu HZ, Chi YL (2013) Incidence of heterotopic ossification after implantation of interspinous process devices. Neurosurg Focus 35(2):E3. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.3.Focus12406
Vertiflex Inc. (2016) Superion indirect decompression system – surgical technique manual. https://www.vertiflexspine.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/VF-LD-0001-L_Superion-Surgical-Technique-Manual.pdf
Zhao XW, Ma JX, Ma XL, Li F, He WW, Jiang X, Wang Y, Han B, Lu B (2017) Interspinous process devices (IPD) alone versus decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS): a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 39:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.074
Zimmer Biomet Spine Inc. (2016) Aspen MIS fusion system – surgical technique guide. https://www.zimmerbiomet.com/content/dam/zimmer-biomet/medical-professionals/000-surgical-techniques/spine/aspen-mis-fusion-system-surgical-technique-guide.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Orndorff, D.G., Heiner, A.D., Youssef, J.A. (2021). Interspinous Devices. In: Cheng, B.C. (eds) Handbook of Spine Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44424-6_59
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44424-6_59
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44423-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44424-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences