Skip to main content

Setting the Size

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quick Guide to Good Clinical Practice
  • 1698 Accesses

Abstract

The most important question that a researcher should ask when planning a study is: ‘How large a sample do I need?’ If the sample size is too small, even a well-conducted study may fail to answer its research question or to detect important effects or associations or may estimate those effects or associations too imprecisely. Similarly, if the sample size is too large, the study will be more difficult and costly, and the size may even lead to a loss in accuracy. Hence, optimum sample size is an essential component of any research. Careful consideration of sample size and power analysis during the planning and design stages of clinical research are crucial [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Suresh K, Thomas SV, Suresh G. Design, data analysis and sampling techniques for clinical research. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2011;14(4):287–90. doi:10.4103/0972-2327.91951.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Tamela FD, Ketchen Jr JD. Organizational configuration and performance: the role of statistical power in extant research. Strateg Manage J. 1999;20:385–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. American Statistical Association. Ethical guidelines for statistical practice: executive summary. Amstat News. April 1999:12Y15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adams-Huet B, Ahn C. Bridging clinical investigators and statisticians: writing the statistical methodology for a research proposal. J Investig Med. 2009;57(8):818. doi:10.231/JIM.0b013e3181c2996c.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lenth RV. Some practical guidelines for effective sample size determination. Am Stat. 2001;55:187Y193.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ahn C, Jung SH. Effect of dropouts on sample size estimates for test on trends across repeated measurements. J Biopharm Stat. 2005;15:33Y41.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ahn C. Sample size requirement for clinical trials with repeated binary outcomes. Drug Inf J. 2008;42:107Y113.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Scarborough M, Gordon S, Whitty C, French N, Njale Y, Chitani A. Corticosteroids for bacterial meningitis in adults in sub-Saharan Africa. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2441–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cingi, C., Muluk, N.B. (2017). Setting the Size. In: Quick Guide to Good Clinical Practice . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44344-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44344-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44343-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44344-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics