Skip to main content

The challenges and implications of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) and of its revision (MiFID II, MiFIR) on the efficiency of financial markets

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Financial Regulation in the EU

Abstract

This chapter will focus on the investigation of challenges underlined by the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) in view of the financial market efficiency. This chapter provides a reporting and an assessment of implications of this directive on the financial market efficiency through the selection of major academic work achieved on this subject. Its revision through MiFID II and MiFIR will also be taken into account given that it constitutes a key directive and a key regulation for the future organization and functioning of European financial markets. In conclusion, the remaining challenges towards the original objectives of MiFID will be underlined to determine what remains to be achieved to benefit from more integrated and efficient European financial markets in order to reduce the cost of capital, to generate growth and to reinforce the international competitiveness of the European Union without neglecting the rights and duties of its citizens and investors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The strategy 2020 is available at the following URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF.

  2. 2.

    The directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU is available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu.

  3. 3.

    The regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 is available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu.

  4. 4.

    For a review of the European challenges post-1992, see Jacquemin, Wright and Silberston (1994)

  5. 5.

    See the following regulation COM(2010)301 Final. For further details see: http://ec.europa.eu.

  6. 6.

    See the following regulation COM (2009) 563 Final. For further details see: http://ec.europa.eu.

  7. 7.

    See the following regulation COM (2010) 484. For further details see: http://ec.europa.eu.

  8. 8.

    See the following regulation COM (2011) 656. For further details see: http://ec.europa.eu.

  9. 9.

    See the following regulation COM (2011) 656 Final. For further details see: http://ec.europa.eu.

Bibliography

  • Abad, D., & Yague, J. (2012). From PIN to VPIN: An introduction to order flow toxicity. The Spanish Review of Financial Economics, 10(2), 74–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aitken, M., Sensenbrenner, F., & Harris, F. (2010). Price discovery in liquid UK shares Pre and Post MiFID, Available at SSRN 2250459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T., & Bondarenko, O. (2014). VPIN and the flash crash. Journal of Financial Markets, 17, 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachelier, L. (1900). Théorie de la spéculation, Gauthier-Villars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, G. (2004). Typologie de l’efficience des marchés, Revue du système financier, 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, E., & Schwartz, R. (1978). The great debate over NYSE rule 390. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 5(1), 5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boneva, L., Linton, O., & Vogt, M. (2015). The effect of fragmentation in trading on market quality in the UK equity market. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 31, 192-213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozdog, D., Florescu, I., Khashanah, K., & Wang, J. (2011). Rare events analysis for high-frequency equity data. Wilmott, 2011(54), 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brogaard, J., Hendershott, T., & Riordan, R. (2014). High frequency trading and price discovery. Review of Financial Studies, 27(8), 2267–2306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherbonnier, F., & Vandelanoite, S. (2008). The impact on financial market liquidity of the markets in financial instruments directive (MiFID). Banque de France – Financial Stability Review, 2, 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemons, E., & Weber, B. (1990). London’s Big Bang: a case study of information technology, competitive impact, and organizational change. Journal of Management Information Systems, 6(4), 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobbaut, R., Gillet, R., & Hübner, G. (2015). La gestion de portefeuille: Instruments, stratégie et performance, De Boeck Supérieur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, J. (2009). Asset pricing. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, K., & Schwartz, R.. (2001). An electronic call market: Its design and desirability, In The electronic call auction: Market mechanism and trading, volume 7 of The New York University Salomon Center Series on Financial Markets and Institutions, pp. 55–85, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doumayrou, B. (2008). Entre concurrence et efficience: l’impact de la directive MIF sur la liquidité des marchés actions reste difficile à anticiper, Bulletin de la Banque de France, (169), 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easley, D., Kiefer, N., O’Hara, M., & Paperman, J. (1996). Liquidity, information, and infrequently traded stocks. The Journal of Finance, 51(4), 1405–1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easley, D., de Prado, M. L., & O’Hara, M. (2012a). Flow toxicity and liquidity in a High-Frequency world. Review of Financial Studies, 25(5), 1457–1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easley, D., de Prado, M. L., & O’Hara, M. (2012b). Bulk classification of trading activity. Johnson School Research Paper Series, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECB, Statistical Data Warehouse. (2014). http://sdw.ecb.europa.eu. Online; accessed 16-July-2015.

  • Fama, E. (1965). The behaviour of stock-market prices. Journal of Business, 38(1), 34–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. (1991). Efficient capital markets II. The Journal of Finance, 46(5), 1575–1617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleuriot, P. (2010). The review of the markets in financial instruments directive (MiFID), Working Group Report to the French Minister for the Economy, Industry and Employment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, T., & Menkveld, A. (2008). Competition for order flow and smart order routing systems. The Journal of Finance, 63(1), 119–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerding, E. (2014). Law, bubbles, and financial regulation, http://corpgov.law.harvard.edu. Online; accessed 16-July-2015.

  • Gresse, C. (2010a). Multi market trading and market liquidity, Technical report, Université Paris-Dauphine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresse, C. (2014a). Market fragmentation and market quality: The European experience. In Market microstructure and nonlinear dynamics (pp. 1–24). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresse, C. (2014b). Market fragmentation: Assessments and prospects? Revue du Conseil scientifique de l’Autorité des marchés financiers, 1, 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamon, J., Jacquillat, B., & Saint Étienne, C. (2007). Consolidation mondiale des bourses, La Documentation francaise.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. (2003). Trading and exchanges: Market microstructure for practitioners. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, F., & Di Marco, E. (2012). European market quality pre- and post-MiFID: A panel discussion of metrics for market integrity and efficiency. The Journal of Trading, 7(4), 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasbrouck, J. (2006). Empirical market microstructure: The institutions, economics, and econometrics of securities trading. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hautcoeur, P.-C., Lagneau-Ymonet, P., & Riva, A. (2010). L’information boursière comme bien public: Enjeux et perspectives de la révision de la directive Européenne des marchés d’instruments financiers. Revue d’économie financière, 98(98–99), 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquemin, A., Wright, D., & Silberston, A. (1994). The European Challenges Post-1992: Shaping factors, shaping actors. Economic Journal, 104, 678–679. Wiley on behalf of the Royal Economic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurti, C. (2009). Introduction to market microstructure. In Investment management (pp. 13–29). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linklaters. (2014). Revision of the markets in financial instruments directive (MiFID II), http://www.linklaters.com. Online; accessed 16-July-2015.

  • Madhavan, A. (2000). Market microstructure: A survey. Journal of Financial markets, 3(3), 205–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, F., & Perotti, E. (2000). Security markets versus bank finance: Legal enforcement and investors’ protection. International Review of Finance, 1(2), 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundell, R. (1961). A theory of optimum currency areas. The American Economic Review, 51(4), 657–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, M. (1995). Market microstructure theory. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, M. (2003). Presidential address: Liquidity and price discovery. The Journal of Finance, 58(4), 1335–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, M., & Ye, M. (2011). Is market fragmentation harming market quality? Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3), 459–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrella, G. (2010). MiFID, Reg NMS and competition across trading venues in Europe and the USA. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 18(3), 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Praet, P. (2012). European financial integration in times of crisis, https://www.ecb.europa.eu. Online accessed 24-July-2015.

  • Rigobon, R., & Sack, B. (2004). The impact of monetary policy on asset prices. Journal of Monetary Economics, 51(8), 1553–1575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. (1965). Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly. Industrial Management Review, 6(2), 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacht, K., Cronin, C., Allen, J., & Preece, R. (2009). Market microstructure: The impact of fragmentation under the markets in financial instruments directive. CFA Institute Centre for Financial Market Integrity, 2009(13), 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, P., & Schwartz, R. (1986). Price discovery in securities markets. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 12(4), 43–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. (2013). Opening remarks: Good price discovery, the neglected regulatory objective. In Rethinking Regulatory Structure (Vol. 10, pp. 1–5). New York: Springer, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. J. (2003). From efficient markets theory to behavioural finance. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Véron, N (2014). The G20 financial reform agenda after five years, Technical Report 11, Bruegel Policy Contribution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, C (2012). La martingalisation des marchés financiers: l’efficacité informationnelle comme convention stochastique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, F. (2010). High-frequency trading, stock volatility, and price discovery. Available at SSRN 1691679.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland Gillet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 8.5
figure 5

Securities Exchange Statistics: Value of executed trades in millions of Euros (Source: ECB - June 2015)

Fig. 8.6
figure 6

Central Counterparty Clearing: Number of participants (Source: ECB - 2015)

Fig. 8.7
figure 7

Central Counterparty Clearing: Number of cash (outright) securities transactions in thousands (Source: ECB - 2015)

Fig. 8.8
figure 8

Central Securities Depositories: Number of transactions in thousands (Source: ECB - 2015)

Fig. 8.9
figure 9

Central Counterpart Clearing: Value of cash (outright) securities transactions in billions of Euros (Source: ECB - 2015)

Fig. 8.10
figure 10

Central Securities Depositories: Participation (End of period) (Source: ECB - 2015)

Table 8.2 Global regulatory changes
Table 8.3 Broad overview of the key changes set out in MiFID II/MiFIR (Source: Linklaters – Factsheet 03 July 2014)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gillet, R., Ligot, S., Firouzi, H.O. (2017). The challenges and implications of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) and of its revision (MiFID II, MiFIR) on the efficiency of financial markets. In: Douady, R., Goulet, C., Pradier, PC. (eds) Financial Regulation in the EU. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44287-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44287-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44286-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44287-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics