Skip to main content

Beauty: A Promise of Enduring Art

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Artistic Visions and the Promise of Beauty
  • 621 Accesses

Abstract

The dominant conception of art in the last century infamously denied the traditional link between art and beauty. While elevating and placing the former at the center of attention, it has rejected the significance of the latter. In contrast to this trend, Lorand argues that beauty is an essential feature of art, and the value of an artwork amounts to the degree of its beauty. This understanding of artistic value supports the claim that the creation of art works will continue as long as there are reflective human beings who seek beauty.

The chapter gives a brief analysis of beauty and attempt to substantiate its vitality for understanding the purpose of artistic activity. Beauty, Lorand argues, answers the need for a special kind of order that is not satisfied by science and logic. It expresses individuality and is not based on known rules or laws; it defines its unique form and therefore it is highly informative. Due to their individuality, aesthetic orders do not compete with each other. The fact that high degree of beauty was achieved in the past does not put an end to the human quest for new beauties in new materials and new forms of art.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    See for instance Carroll 1993, Carrier 1998, Bachrach 2002 and Rosenstein 2002.

  2. 2.

    Danto (1973, 16) notes that art ‘becomes increasingly its own (and only) subject’, a view that coheres with the idea of self-understanding, and in a way also with ‘art for art’s sake’. I have discussed this view elsewhere (Lorand 2000, 275–278).

  3. 3.

    Nehamas notes that “Beauty is the most discredited philosophical notion—so discredited that I could not even find an entry for it in the index of the many books in the philosophy of art I consulted in order to find it discredited” (Nehamas 2000).

  4. 4.

    I have discussed these points extensively in Lorand 1994.

References

  • Aristotle. 1922. The poetics of Aristotle, ed. and trans. S. H. Butcher. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, Sondra. 2002. Can art end? Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60: 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, David. 1998. “Danto and his critics: After the end of art and art history.” History and Theory, 37 (Theme Issue, Danto and his critics: Art history, historiography and after the end of art), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Noel. 1993. Essence, expression and history: Arthur Danto’s philosophy of art. In Danto and his critics, ed. Mark Rollins, 79–106. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danto, Arthur C. 1973. Artworks and real things. Theoria 39: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danto, Arthur C. 1994. Beauty and morality. In Embodied meanings: Critical essays and aesthetic meditations, 363–375. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danto, Arthur C. 1997. After the end of art: Contemporary art and the pale of history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danto, Arthur C. 1998. Beyond the Brillo Box. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danto, Arthur C. 2003. The abuse of beauty. Chicago/La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirac, P.A.M. 1963. The evolution of the physicist’s picture of nature. Scientific American 208: 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Nelson. 1976. Languages of art. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 2000. Critique of the power of judgment, edited and translated by Paul Guyer. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorand, Ruth. 1994. Beauty and its opposites. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 52: 399–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorand, Ruth. 2000. Aesthetic order—A philosophy of order, beauty and art. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl, and Frederick Engels. 1955. ‘Preface to a contribution to a critique of political economy’, in selected works, vol. I. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, Abraham. 1943. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review 50: 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehamas, Alexander. 2000. ‘An essay on beauty and judgment.’ The Threepenny Review. http://www.threepennyreview.com/samples/nehamas_w00.html. Accessed 6 Oct 2013.

  • Rosenstein, Leon. 2002. The end of art theory. Humanitas 15: 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth Lorand .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lorand, R. (2017). Beauty: A Promise of Enduring Art. In: Higgins, K., Maira, S., Sikka, S. (eds) Artistic Visions and the Promise of Beauty. Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43893-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics