Abstract
The dominant conception of art in the last century infamously denied the traditional link between art and beauty. While elevating and placing the former at the center of attention, it has rejected the significance of the latter. In contrast to this trend, Lorand argues that beauty is an essential feature of art, and the value of an artwork amounts to the degree of its beauty. This understanding of artistic value supports the claim that the creation of art works will continue as long as there are reflective human beings who seek beauty.
The chapter gives a brief analysis of beauty and attempt to substantiate its vitality for understanding the purpose of artistic activity. Beauty, Lorand argues, answers the need for a special kind of order that is not satisfied by science and logic. It expresses individuality and is not based on known rules or laws; it defines its unique form and therefore it is highly informative. Due to their individuality, aesthetic orders do not compete with each other. The fact that high degree of beauty was achieved in the past does not put an end to the human quest for new beauties in new materials and new forms of art.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
Nehamas notes that “Beauty is the most discredited philosophical notion—so discredited that I could not even find an entry for it in the index of the many books in the philosophy of art I consulted in order to find it discredited” (Nehamas 2000).
- 4.
I have discussed these points extensively in Lorand 1994.
References
Aristotle. 1922. The poetics of Aristotle, ed. and trans. S. H. Butcher. London: Macmillan.
Bachrach, Sondra. 2002. Can art end? Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60: 57–66.
Carrier, David. 1998. “Danto and his critics: After the end of art and art history.” History and Theory, 37 (Theme Issue, Danto and his critics: Art history, historiography and after the end of art), 1–16.
Carroll, Noel. 1993. Essence, expression and history: Arthur Danto’s philosophy of art. In Danto and his critics, ed. Mark Rollins, 79–106. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Danto, Arthur C. 1973. Artworks and real things. Theoria 39: 1–17.
Danto, Arthur C. 1994. Beauty and morality. In Embodied meanings: Critical essays and aesthetic meditations, 363–375. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux.
Danto, Arthur C. 1997. After the end of art: Contemporary art and the pale of history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Danto, Arthur C. 1998. Beyond the Brillo Box. Oakland: University of California Press.
Danto, Arthur C. 2003. The abuse of beauty. Chicago/La Salle: Open Court.
Dirac, P.A.M. 1963. The evolution of the physicist’s picture of nature. Scientific American 208: 45–53.
Goodman, Nelson. 1976. Languages of art. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett.
Kant, Immanuel. 2000. Critique of the power of judgment, edited and translated by Paul Guyer. Cambridge University Press.
Lorand, Ruth. 1994. Beauty and its opposites. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 52: 399–406.
Lorand, Ruth. 2000. Aesthetic order—A philosophy of order, beauty and art. London: Routledge.
Marx, Karl, and Frederick Engels. 1955. ‘Preface to a contribution to a critique of political economy’, in selected works, vol. I. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.
Maslow, Abraham. 1943. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review 50: 370–396.
Nehamas, Alexander. 2000. ‘An essay on beauty and judgment.’ The Threepenny Review. http://www.threepennyreview.com/samples/nehamas_w00.html. Accessed 6 Oct 2013.
Rosenstein, Leon. 2002. The end of art theory. Humanitas 15: 32–35.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lorand, R. (2017). Beauty: A Promise of Enduring Art. In: Higgins, K., Maira, S., Sikka, S. (eds) Artistic Visions and the Promise of Beauty. Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43893-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43893-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43891-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43893-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)