Abstract
Penetrating trauma, burns, congenital disorders, and tumor excision can cause complex wounds involving several different types of tissue, leading to severe facial disfigurement. Patients may lose the ability to eat, smell, breathe, speak, and see normally. Often these patients require a permanent feeding tube and tracheotomy. Equally important, patients also lose the ability to communicate their emotions to others by way of their facial expressions. These circumstances lead to diminished feelings of self-worth and social isolation. Prior to the era of facial transplantation, reconstruction of major facial defects involved a prolonged series of challenging operations that typically combined various types of flaps, grafts, and prosthetic material. Patients were commonly subjected to dozens of operations. Aside from the need for multiple operations, other major drawbacks to this approach include expense, frequent complications, and the need for multiple flap and graft donor sites. Furthermore, the results of staged reconstruction, especially for central facial defects, are often so poor that patients frequently withdraw from routine social interactions. Writing in 2002 on the pages of The Lancet, Peter Butler called attention to this problem and wondered if transplantation was “fantasy or the future” for facial reconstruction [1].
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Butler P. Face transplantation—fantasy or the future? Lancet. 2002;360:5–6.
Siemionow M, Ozturk C. An update on facial transplantation cases performed between 2005 and 2010. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(6):707e–20.
Khalifian S, Brazio PS, Mohan R, et al. Facial transplantation: the first 9 years. Lancet. 2014;384(9960):2153–63.
Cavadas PC, Ibanez J, Thione A. Surgical aspects of a lower face, mandible and tongue allotransplantation. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2012;28(1):43–7.
Pomahac B, Nowinski D, Diaz-Siso JR, et al. Face transplantation. Curr Probl Surg. 2011;48(5):293–357.
Pomahac B, Diaz-Siso JR, Bueno EM. Evolution of indications for facial transplantation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64(11):1410–6.
Takamatsu A, Harashina T, Inoue T. Selection of appropriate recipient vessels in difficult, microsurgical head and neck reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1996;12:499–507.
Mohan R, Fischer M, Dorafshar A, et al. Principles of face transplant revision: beyond primary repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(6):1295–304.
Fischer S, Wallins JS, Bueno E, et al. Airway recovery after face transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(6):1305.
Whitaker IS, Duggan EM, Alloway RR, et al. Composite tissue allotransplantation: a review of relevant immunological issues for plastic surgeons. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61(5):481–92.
Petruzzo P, Kanitakis J, Badet L, et al. Long-term follow-up in composite tissue allotransplantation: in-depth study of five (hand and face) recipients. Am J Transplant. 2011;4:808–16.
Murray JE. Organ transplantation (skin, kidney, heart) and the plastic surgeon. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971;47:425.
Lantieri L, Hivelin M, Audard V, et al. Feasibility, reproducibility, risks and benefits of face transplantation: a prospective study of outcomes. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(2):367–78.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lohman, R.F., Ozturk, C., Dorafshar, A.H. (2017). Face Transplantation. In: Kuriakose, M.A. (eds) Contemporary Oral Oncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43854-2_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43854-2_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43852-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43854-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)