Skip to main content

Black-White Mortality Differentials at Old-Age: New Evidence from the National Longitudinal Mortality Study*

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applied Demography and Public Health in the 21st Century

Part of the book series: Applied Demography Series ((ADS,volume 8))

Abstract

We investigate the old-age mortality experience of selected cohorts born between 1898 and 1915. Using large samples from the 2013 release of the National Longitudinal Mortality Survey (NLMS) and single-year age grouping, we provide new evidence on the black advantage in old-age survival . Analyzing cohort age-specific morality rates and survival curves from cohort life tables , we observe a black mortality disadvantage that was present at ages 70–75, then narrowed, and completely disappeared by age 85. There is some evidence that mortality is lower for blacks than it is for whites at ages 85–90, consistent with a crossover in age-specific mortality around age 85. However, a distinct crossover age threshold followed by consistently lower age-specific death rates for blacks was not observed. We discuss our results in the context of recent cohort evidence from survey data as well as the literature on black-white mortality crossover.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Statements to the same effect can be found in earlier work. Sibley commented in 1930 that “the fact that in old age the Negro rates are lower than those for whites suggests the selective effect of disease of early life in eliminating the weaker members of the Negro population before they reach middle age” (p. 11).

  2. 2.

    Death registration states of 1920: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, and The District of Columbia.

  3. 3.

    Sources: 1939-41—Greville (1947); 1969-71—National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS, 1975); 1979-81—NCHS (1985); 1989-91—NCHS (1997); 1999-2001—Arias, Curtin, Wei and Anderson (2008).

  4. 4.

    Based on the 2010 life table (Arias 2014), 55.0% of black women (64.4% of white women) are predicted to reach the female crossover life expectancy age of 80, while 27.0% of black men (38.3% of white men) are expected to reach the male crossover life expectancy age of 84. Another hypothesis is greater und erenumeration of the black population. Elo (2001) points to low coverage of the black population in the census. She finds that “(b)etween 1930 and 1990, census omission rates for African American men ranged from a high of 10.5% in 1940 to a low of 7.0% in 1980” (p.13). This is consistent with earlier evidence (e.g. Siegel 1974).

  5. 5.

    Another hypothesis is greater underenumeration of the black population. Elo (2001) points to low coverage of the black population in the census. She finds that “(b)etween 1930 and 1990, census omission rates for African American men ranged from a high of 10.5% in 1940 to a low of 7.0% in 1980” (p.13). This is consistent with earlier evidence (e.g. Siegel 1974).

  6. 6.

    Several explanations for why misreporting is a problem particularly for the black population have been given, even though none has emerged as a “smoking gun”. Coale and Kisker (1990) suggest that “age heaping”—the tendency of people to round their age or birth dates—is more common among blacks. The authors state that “heaping on ages divisible by 5 or 10 is a generic characteristic of censuses in which age (at last birthday) is recorded when knowledge of age is imprecise” (p.30). Elo and Preston (1994) propose that poor birth registration and incentives to overstate age as a result of the introduction of Social Security retirement benefits may be at work. Most of the black population aged 60 and older in the 1980s—the period our study covers—was born before 1920 and in the rural South. Before 1920, very few southern states were members of the Birth Registration Area.

  7. 7.

    Using model life table comparisons and adjustments for major sources of error, Zelnik (1969) establishes more broadly the distinct pattern of mortality among the black population. Subsequent analysis of census mortality data by Elo and Preston (1994) affirms the unusual pattern but the authors remain very skeptical.

  8. 8.

    This literature also points to problems with the age data among non-whites. For example, Kestenbaum (1992) finds that only 73% of blacks whose age at death was 65 or over (62% of blacks whose age at death was 85 or over) had a reported age in their Social Security files that exactly matched their death certificate. For whites this percentage was almost 95% (92%).

  9. 9.

    This is the date that the NLMS PUMS assigned as a common starting point for the combined CPS records.

References

  • Arias, E. (2014). United States life tables, 2010. National Vital Statistics Reports, 63(7). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias, E., Curtin, L. R., Wei, R., & Anderson, R. N. (2008). U.S. Decennial life tables for 1999–2001, United States life tables. National Vital Statistics Reports, 57(1). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayo, F. (1972). Mortality of the aged. Transactions of the Society of Actuaries, 24, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkman, L., Singer, B., & Manton, K. (1989). Black/white differences in health status and mortality among the elderly. Demography, 26(4), 661–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of the Census. (1936). United States life tables: 1929 to 1931, 1920 to 1929, 1919 to 1921, 1909 to 1911, 1901 to 1910, 1900 to 1902. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coady, S., Johnson, N. J., Hakes, J. K., & Sorlie, P. D. (2014). Individual education, area income and mortality and recurrence of myocardial infarction in a Medicare cohort: The National longitudinal mortality study. BMC Public Health, 14, 705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coale, A. J., & Kisker, E. E. (1986). Mortality crossovers: Reality or bad data? Population Studies, 40(3), 389–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coale, A. J., & Kisker, E. E. (1990). Defects in data on old age mortality in the United States: New procedures for calculating mortality schedules and life tables at the highest ages. Asian and Pacific Population Forum, 4(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corti, M. C., Guralnik, J. M., Ferrucci, L., Izmirlian, G., Leveille, S. G., Pahor, M., et al. (1999). Evidence for a black-white crossover in all-cause and coronary heart disease mortality in an older population: The North Carolina EPESE. American Journal of Public Health, 89(3), 308–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, D. (2000). Causes of improving health and longevity at older ages: A review of the explanations. Genus, LXI(1), 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crimmins, E. M. (1981). The changing pattern of American mortality decline, 1940–77, and its implications for the future. Population and Development Review, 7, 229–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, D., Deaton, A., & Lleras-Muney, A. (2006). The determinants of mortality. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(3), 7–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupre, M., Franzese, A., & Parrado, E. (2006). Religious attendance and mortality: Implications for the black-white mortality crossover. Demography, 43(1), 141–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberstein, I., Nam, C., & Heyman, K. (2008). Causes of death and mortality crossovers by race. Biodemography and Social Biology, 54(2), 214–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elo, I. T. (2001). New African American life tables from 1935–1940 to 1985–1990. Demography, 38(1), 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elo, I. T., & Preston, S. H. (1994). Estimating African-American mortality from inaccurate data. Demography, 31(3), 427–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elo, I. T., & Preston, S. H. (1996). Educational differentials in mortality: United States, 1979–1985. Social Science and Medicine, 42, 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elo, I. T., Preston, S. H., Rosenwaike, I., Hill, M. E., & Cheney, T. P. (1996). Consistency of age reporting on death certificates and Social Security Administration records among elderly African Americans. Social Science Research, 25, 292–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenelon, A. (2013). An examination of black/white differences in the rate of age-related mortality increase. Demographic Research, 29, 441–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch, C., & Crimmins, E. (2004). Inflammatory exposure and historical changes in human life-spans. Science, 305, 1736–1739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geruso, M. (2012). Black-white disparities in life expectancy: How much can standard SES variables explain? Demography, 49(2), 553–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greville, T. N. E. (1947). United States life tables and actuarial tables 1939–1941. National Office of Vital Statistics. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. E., Preston, S. H., & Rosenwaike, I. (2000). Age reporting among white Americans aged 85+: Results of a record linkage study. Demography, 37, 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horiuchi, S., Finch, C. E., Meslé, F., & Vallin, J. (2003). Differential patterns of age-related mortality increase in middle age and old age. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 58(6), B495–B507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horiuchi, S., & Wilmoth, J. R. (1998). Deceleration in the age pattern of mortality at older ages. Demography, 35(4), 391–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussey, J. M., & Elo, I. T. (1997). Cause-specific mortality among older African-Americans: correlates and consequences of age misreporting. Social Biology, 44(3–4), 227–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. J., Sorlie, P. D., & Backlund, E. (1999). The impact of specific occupation on mortality in the U.S. National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Demography, 36(3), 355–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kestenbaum, E. (1992). A description of the extreme aged population based on improved Medicare enrollment data. Demography, 29, 565–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, E., & Hauser, P. (1973). Differential mortality in the United States: A study in socioeconomic epidemiology. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, S., Brown, J., & Harmsen, K. (2003). Black-White differences in mortality compression and deceleration and the mortality crossover reconsidered. Research on Aging, 25(5), 456–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manton, K. G., Poss, S. S., & Wing, S. (1979). The black-white crossover: Investigation from the perspective of the components of aging. Gerontologist, 19, 291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manton, K. G., & Stallard, E. (1981). Methods for evaluating the heterogeneity of aging processes in human populations using vital statistics data: explaining the black/white mortality crossover by a model of mortality selection. Human Biology, 53, 47–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manton, K. G., & Stallard, E. (1984). Recent trends in mortality analysis. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K. C., & Cope, L. G. (1987). Sources of age and date-of-birth misreporting in the 1900 U.S. census. Demography 24: 563–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, R. K. (2012). Uncrossing the U.S. black-white mortality crossover: The role of cohort forces in life course mortality risk. Demography, 49, 773–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, R. J., & Bayo, F. (1965). Mortality of workers entitled to old-age benefits under OASDI. Transactions of the Society of Actuaries, 17, 417–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam, C. (1995). Another look at mortality crossovers. Biodemography and Social Biology, 42(1–2), 133–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam, C. B., Weatherby, N. L., & Ockay, K. A. (1978). Causes of death which contribute to the mortality crossover effect. Social Biology, 25(4), 306–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Health Statistics. (1973). Mortality trends: Age, color, and sex. United States 1950–69. Series 20, No. 15. DHEW Pub. No. (HRA) 74-1852. Public Health Services. Rockville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Health Statistics. (1975). United States life tables: 1969–71. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Health Statistics. (1985). U.S. decennial life tables for 1979–81 (Vol. 1). No. 1. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 85-1150-1. Public Health Service. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Health Statistics. (1997). U.S. decennial life tables for 1989–91 (Vol. 1). No. 1. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Longitudinal Mortality Study Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) File Release 4 Documentation. (2013, February 28). Retrieved April 22, 2016 https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov/static/studies/nlms/Code_Manuals_and_Forms.pdf. Accessed on April 22, 2016.

  • Pearl, R. (1922). The biology of death. Philadelphia and London: J.B. Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, S. H., & Elo, I. T. (2006). Black mortality at very old ages in official US life tables: A skeptical appraisal. Population and Development Review, 32(2), 557–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, S. H., Elo, I. T., Rosenwaike, I., & Hill, M. (1996). African-American mortality at older ages: Results of a matching study. Demography, 33(2), 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, S. H., Elo, I. T., & Stewart, Q. (1999). Effects of age misreporting on mortality estimates at older ages. Population Studies, 53(2), 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogot, E., Sorlie, P. D., & Johnson, N. J. (1992). Life expectancy by employment status in the national longitudinal mortality study, income, and education. Public Health Reports, 107(4), 457–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenwaike, I. (1968). On measuring the extreme aged in the population. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63(321), 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenwaike, I. (1979). A new evaluation of United States census data on the extreme aged. Demography, 16, 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenwaike, I., & Logue, B. (1983). Accuracy of death certificate ages for the extreme aged. Demography, 20(4), 569–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, N. (1965). The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review, 52, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sautter, J. M., Thomas, P. A., Dupre, M. E., & George, L. K. (2012). Socioeconomic status and the Black-White mortality crossover. American Journal of Public Health, 102(8), 1566–1571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, R. (1976). Measuring mortality trends and differentials. Social Biology, 23, 235–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha, L. B., & Preston, S. H. (1995). Consistency of census and vital registration data on older Americans: 1970–1990. Survey Methodology, 21, 167–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, E. (1930). Differential mortality in Tennessee. Nashville, TN: The Fisk University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J. S. (1974). Estimates of coverage of the population by sex, race, and age in the 1970 Census. Demography, 11, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorlie, P. D., Backlund, E., & Keller, J. B. (1995). US mortality by economic, demographic, and social characteristics: The National Longitudinal Mortality Study. American Journal of Public Health, 85(7), 949–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, R., & Nam, C. (1968). The lower mortality rates of nonwhites at the older ages: An enigma in demographic analysis. Research Reports in Social Science, 11, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaupel, J. W., Manton, K. G., & Stallard, E. (1979). The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality. Demography, 16(3), 439–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, K. M., & Preston, S. H. (1996). How many Americans are alive because of twentieth century improvements in mortality? Population and Development Review, 22, 415–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelnik, M. (1969). Age pattern of mortality of American Negroes 1900–02 to 1959–61. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64(326), 433–451.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank Neil Bennett for helpful comments and suggestions. We are also grateful to Charlie Nam for helpful discussion at an early stage of this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duygu Başaran Şahin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Şahin, D.B., Heiland, F.W. (2017). Black-White Mortality Differentials at Old-Age: New Evidence from the National Longitudinal Mortality Study* . In: Hoque, M., Pecotte, B., McGehee, M. (eds) Applied Demography and Public Health in the 21st Century. Applied Demography Series, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43688-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43688-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43686-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43688-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics