Skip to main content

Imaging Semiology: Ultrasound and MRI in the Assessment of Muscle Injury

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Muscle Injuries in Sport Athletes

Part of the book series: Sports and Traumatology ((SPORTS))

  • 2184 Accesses

Abstract

Competitive athletes are at a high risk for acute and repetitive muscle injury. Although the clinical examination remains the core of any patient evaluation, radiology plays an increasingly important role in the initial assessment and follow-up of muscle injury. Muscle injuries are responsible for a large proportion of time lost to competition. Appropriate management decisions, return to training and competition, and prediction of injury recurrence may all be influenced by appropriate imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been applied to muscle injuries for more than a decade and has evolved into a valuable tool for the routine evaluation of traumatic muscle injuries in athletes. Ultrasound remains a popular alternative modality for the assessment of acute muscle injury and has some definite advantages over MRI: lower cost and greater availability, short imaging time, no contraindications (e.g. pacemakers), capability for dynamic imaging and comparison with the contralateral side. However, user dependence and lower sensitivity tend to outweigh some of these advantages. This chapter will outline the semiology of muscle injuries, that is describe different types and signs of musculotendinous injuries including musculotendinous strain, muscle contusion and avulsion injury. The focus of this chapter is on clinically applicable techniques of standard MRI and ultrasound.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Askling CM, Tengvar M, Saartok T, Thorstensson A. Proximal hamstring strains of stretching type in different sports: injury situations, clinical and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics, and return to sport. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1799–804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mueller-Wohlfahrt HW, Haensel L, Mithoefer K, Ekstrand J, English B, McNally S, et al. Terminology and classification of muscle injuries in sport: the Munich consensus statement. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(6):342–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Elliott MC, Zarins B, Powell JW, Kenyon CD. Hamstring muscle strains in professional football players: a 10-year review. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:843–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gibbs NJ, Cross TM, Cameron M, Houang MT. The accuracy of MRI in predicting recovery and recurrence of acute grade one hamstring muscle strains within the same season in Australian Rules football players. J Sci Med Sport. 2004;7(2):248–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cross TM, Gibbs N, Houang MT, Cameron M. Acute quadriceps muscle strains: magnetic resonance imaging features and prognosis. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(3):710–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heiderscheit BC, Sherry MA, Silder A, Chumanov ES, Thelen DG. Hamstring strain injuries: recommendations for diagnosis, rehabilitation, and injury prevention. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(2):67–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Koulouris G, Connell DA, Brukner P, Schneider-Kolsky M. Magnetic resonance imaging parameters for assessing risk of recurrent hamstring injuries in elite athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(9):1500–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Verrall GM, Slavotinek JP, Barnes PG, Fon GT, Esterman A. Assessment of physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging findings of hamstring injury as predictors for recurrent injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(4):215–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tirman PF, Bost FW, Steinbach LS, Mall JC, Peterfy CG, Sampson TG, et al. MR arthrographic depiction of tears of the rotator cuff: benefit of abduction and external rotation of the arm. Radiology. 1994;192(3):851–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Palmer WE, Kuong SJ, Elmadbouh HM. MR imaging of myotendinous strain. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173(3):703–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bencardino JT, Rosenberg ZS, Brown RR, Hassankhani A, Lustrin ES, Beltran J. Traumatic musculotendinous injuries of the knee: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiographics. 2000;20(Spec No):S103–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Koulouris G, Ting AY, Jhamb A, Connell D, Kavanagh EC. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of injuries to the calf muscle complex. Skeletal Radiol. 2007;36(10):921–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Noseworthy MD, Davis AD, Elzibak AH. Advanced MR imaging techniques for skeletal muscle evaluation. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2010;14(2):257–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Connell DA, Schneider-Kolsky ME, Hoving JL, Malara F, Buchbinder R, Koulouris G, et al. Longitudinal study comparing sonographic and MRI assessments of acute and healing hamstring injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183(4):975–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Proske U, Morgan DL. Muscle damage from eccentric exercise: mechanism, mechanical signs, adaptation and clinical applications. J Physiol. 2001;537(Pt 2):333–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Donoghue DO. Treatment of injuries to athletes. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jarvinen TA, Jarvinen TL, Kaariainen M, Aarimaa V, Vaittinen S, Kalimo H, et al. Muscle injuries: optimising recovery. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007;21(2):317–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mallone TR. Basic science of musculotendinous structure. In: Farrett WE, et al., editors. Muscle injury and rehabilitation. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1998. p. 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Deutsch AL, Mink JH. Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal injuries. Radiol Clin North Am. 1989;27(5):983–1002.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Duvvuri U, Reddy R, Patel SD, Kaufman JH, Kneeland JB, Leigh JS. T1rho-relaxation in articular cartilage: effects of enzymatic degradation. Magn Reson Med. 1997;38(6):863–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee JC, Healy J. Sonography of lower limb muscle injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(2):341–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cross MJ, Vandersluis R, Wood D, Banff M. Surgical repair of chronic complete hamstring tendon rupture in the adult patient. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26(6):785–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Koh ES, McNally EG. Ultrasound of skeletal muscle injury. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2007;11(2):162–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beiner JM, Jokl P. Muscle contusion injury and myositis ossificans traumatica. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;403 Suppl:S110–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Beiner JM, Jokl P. Muscle contusion injuries: current treatment options. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001;9(4):227–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Steinbach L, Fleckenstein J, Mink J. MR imaging of muscle injuries. In: BS W, editor. Syllabus: a categorial course in musculoskeletal radiology. Oak Brook: RSNA Publications; 1993. p. 225–37.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Blankenbaker DG, Tuite MJ. Temporal changes of muscle injury. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2010;14(2):176–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. el-Khoury GY, Daniel WW, Kathol MH. Acute and chronic avulsive injuries. Radiol Clin North Am. 1997;35(3):747–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Stevens MA, El-Khoury GY, Kathol MH, Brandser EA, Chow S. Imaging features of avulsion injuries. Radiographics. 1999;19(3):655–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Silder A, Heiderscheit BC, Thelen DG, Enright T, Tuite MJ. MR observations of long-term musculotendon remodeling following a hamstring strain injury. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37(12):1101–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Koulouris G, Connell D. Hamstring muscle complex: an imaging review. Radiographics. 2005;25(3):571–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Slavotinek JP. Muscle injury: the role of imaging in prognostic assignment and monitoring of muscle repair. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2010;14(2):194–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Takebayashi S, Takasawa H, Banzai Y, Miki H, Sasaki R, Itoh Y, et al. Sonographic findings in muscle strain injury: clinical and MR imaging correlation. J Ultrasound Med. 1995;14(12):899–905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Orchard J, Best TM. The management of muscle strain injuries: an early return versus the risk of recurrence. Clin J Sport Med. 2002;12(1):3–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pomeranz SJ, Heidt Jr RS. MR imaging in the prognostication of hamstring injury. Work in progress. Radiology. 1993;189(3):897–900.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Slavotinek JP, Verrall GM, Fon GT. Hamstring injury in athletes: using MR imaging measurements to compare extent of muscle injury with amount of time lost from competition. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179(6):1621–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schneider-Kolsky ME, Hoving JL, Warren P, Connell DA. A comparison between clinical assessment and magnetic resonance imaging of acute hamstring injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(6):1008–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank W. Roemer MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roemer, F.W. (2017). Imaging Semiology: Ultrasound and MRI in the Assessment of Muscle Injury. In: Roger, B., Guermazi, A., Skaf, A. (eds) Muscle Injuries in Sport Athletes. Sports and Traumatology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43344-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43344-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43342-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43344-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics