Skip to main content

Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evidence-Based Critical Care
  • 90k Accesses

Abstract

Despite advances in modern medicine, sepsis and septic shock continue to be a leading cause of death worldwide. The United States alone has over 750,000 reported cases per year. It is estimated that severe sepsis is diagnosed in 2 % of all hospital admissions resulting in 10 % of all ICU admissions. The diagnosis and management of sepsis have greatly evolved with the creation of care “bundles” such as Early Goal Directed Therapy incorporated into the Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Research results continue to refine the proposed guidelines in the treatment of this disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Society of Critical Care Medicine. [Revised 4/2015 by the SSC Executive Committee]. Accessed at: http://www.survivingsepsis.org/Bundles/Pages/default.aspx.

  2. Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(4):536–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Angus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(9):840–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mayr FB, Yende S, Angus DC. Epidemiology of severe sepsis. Virulence. 2014;5(1):4–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(19):1368–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(2):165–228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Finfer S, Bellomo R, Boyce N, et al. SAFE Study Investigators. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(22):2247–56.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Caironi P, Togoni G, Masson S, et al. ALBIOS Study Investigators. Albumin replacement in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(15):1412–21.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Myburgh JA, Mythen MG. Resuscitation fluids. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(13):1243–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yunos NM, Bellomo R, Hegarty C, et al. Association between a chloride-liberal vs chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy and kidney injury in critically ill adults. JAMA. 2012;308:1566–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Young P, Bailey M, Beasley R, et al. Effect of a buffered crystalloid solution vs saline on acute kidney injury among patients in the intensive care unit: The SPLIT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015;314:1701–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Myburgh JA, Finfer S, Bellomo R, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(20):1901–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Holst LB, Haase N, Wetterslev J, et al. Transfusion requirements in septic shock 9TRISS) trial – comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Park DW, Chun BC, Kwon SS, et al. Red blood cell transfusions are associated with lower mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a propensity-matched analysis. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(12):3140–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ebert RV, Stead EA. Circulatory failure in acute infections. J Clin Invest. 1941;20:671–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ait-Oufella H, Lemionne S, Boelle P, et al. Mottling score predicts survival in septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(5):801–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cawcutt K, Peters S. Severe sepsis and septic shock: clinical overview and update on management. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89(11):1572–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, et al. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1402–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marik P, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, et al. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(9):2642–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stawicki SP, Ej A, Eiferman ES, et al. Prospective evaluation of intravascular volume status in critically ill patients: does inferior vena cava collapsibility correlate with central venous pressure? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(4):956–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Seymour C, Rosengart M. Septic shock: advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA. 2015;314(7):708–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Jones AE, Shapiro NI, Trzeciak S, et al. Lactate clearance vs central venous oxygen saturation as goals of early sepsis therapy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2010;303(8):739–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, et al. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(9):779–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Investigators VASST. Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(9):877–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schein M, Marshall J. Source control. A guide to the management of surgical infections. Heidelberg: Springer; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(6):1589–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gamacho-Montero J, Gutierrez-Pizarraya A, Escoresca-Ortega A, et al. De-escalation of empirical therapy is associated with lower mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(1):32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kollef MH. What can be expected from antimicrobial de-escalation in the critically ill? Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(1):92–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ginde AA, Moss M. Lung-protective ventilation in emergency department patients with severe sepsis. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(1):96–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Russell JA. Management of sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(16):1699–713.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2001;354(19):1359–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Study Investigators NICE-SUGAR, Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY, et al. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1283–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Arabi YM, Tamim HM, Dhar GS, et al. Permissive underfeeding and intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93(3):569–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Investigators PCESS, Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT, et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(18):1683–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. ARISE Investigators, ANZICS Clinical Trials Group, Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M, et al. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(16):1496–506.

    Google Scholar 

  36. ProMISe Investigators, Mouncey P, Osborn T, Power S, et al. Trial of Early, Goal-Directed Resuscitation for Septic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:130111.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Angus DC, Barnato AE, Bell D, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of early goal-directed therapy for septic shock: the ARISE, ProCESS and ProMISe Investigators. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(9):1549–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Suzuki S, et al. Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000–2012. JAMA. 2014;311(13):1308–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Annane D, Sebille V, Charpentier C, et al. Effect of treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with septic shock. JAMA. 2002;288(7):862–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Moreno R, Sprung C, Annane D, et al. Time course of organ failure in patients with septic shock treated with hydrocortisone: results of the Corticus study. In: Applied physiology in intensive care medicine 1. Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. p. 423–30.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Pilcher D, et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria in defining severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1629–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Investigators SEPSISPAM. High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1583–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, et al. Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:344–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, et al. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2564–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Boyd J, Forbes J, Nakada T, et al. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hospital Quality Initiative, Outcome Measures. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. [Last Modified: 09/29/2015]. Accessed at: https://www.cms.gov/medicare/quality-initiatives-patient-assessment-instruments/hospitalqualityinits/outcomemeasures.html.

  47. Cooper J, Walley K, Wiggs B, et al. Bicarbonate does not improve hemodynamics in critically ill patients who have lactic acidosis. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:492.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Morelli A, Ertmer C, Westphal M, et al. Effect of heart rate control with esmolol on hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock. JAMA. 2013;310:1683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Iwashyna TJ, Ely EW, Smith DM, et al. Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis. JAMA. 2010;304(16):1787–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Regazzoni CJ, Zamora RJ, Petrucci E, et al. Hospital and 1-year outcomes of septic syndromes in older people: a cohort study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008;63(2):210–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Balas MC, Vasilevskis EE, Olsen KM, et al. Effectiveness and safety of the awakening and breathing coordination, delirium monitoring/management, and early exercise/mobility bundle. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(5):1024–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Barr J, Fraser G, Puntillo K, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(1):263–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(2):580–637.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Michard F, Warltier DC, Ph D. Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2005;103(2):419–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rommel Sagana .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Collapsible IVC in hypovolemia (AVI 737 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sagana, R., Hyzy, R.C. (2017). Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock. In: Hyzy, R. (eds) Evidence-Based Critical Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43341-7_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43341-7_53

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43339-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43341-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics