Abstract
Light pollution has become an important theme of both scientific research and policy-making. Although in recent years we have seen a boost of research on this topic, there is still surprisingly little knowledge on the levels of artificial light at night that wild animals really experience. I made use of miniature light loggers attached to individual free-living European blackbirds (Turdus merula) to measure the light intensity to which these birds are exposed to in forest and urban areas. I have first shown that male blackbirds living in a city are indeed exposed to higher levels of light at night compared to forest conspecifics, but these levels are substantially lower to what can be measured underneath typical street lamps. Recently I have offered new perspectives by estimating the subjective day length to which urban and rural blackbirds are exposed to and by analysing the overall light intensity to which blackbirds are exposed daily. In a series of studies, I have interpreted these data in the context of daily patterns of activity as well as seasonal biology. European blackbirds which were exposed to a longer photoperiod than their rural counterparts extended their activity into the night and showed reduced levels of melatonin production in the early morning, suggesting that this could be the biophysical process underlying the early onset of daily activity, but also the advanced breeding season observed in many avian species that successfully colonize urban areas. Indeed, I found a remarkable similarity between the difference in the photoperiod experienced by rural and urban blackbirds and the difference in timing of reproduction and onset of daily activity between my two study populations. I will discuss these findings and underlie several outstanding questions that still remain unresolved.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aubé M, Roby J, Kocifaj M (2013) Evaluating potential spectral impacts of various artificial lights on melatonin suppression, photosynthesis, and star visibility. PLoS One 8:e67798
Bennie J, Davies TW, Duffy JP et al (2014) Contrasting trends in light pollution across Europe based on satellite observed night time lights. Sci Rep 4:3789. doi:10.1038/srep03789
Bennie J, Duffy J, Davies T et al (2015) Global trends in exposure to light pollution in natural terrestrial ecosystems. Remote Sens 7:2715–2730. doi:10.3390/rs70302715
Cochran W, Warner D, Tester J, Kuechle V (1965) Automatic radio-tracking system for monitoring animal movements. Bioscience 15:98–100
Da Silva A, Samplonius JM, Schlicht E et al (2014) Artificial night lighting rather than traffic noise affects the daily timing of dawn and dusk singing in common European songbirds. Behav Ecol 25:1037–1047. doi:10.1093/beheco/aru103
Da Silva A, Valcu M, Kempenaers B (2015) Light pollution alters the phenology of dawn and dusk singing in common European songbirds. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 370:20140126
Davies WIL, Turton M, Peirson SN et al (2012) Vertebrate ancient opsin photopigment spectra and the avian photoperiodic response. Biol Lett 8:291–294
Davies TW, Bennie J, Inger R et al (2013a) Artificial light pollution: Are shifting spectral signatures changing the balance of species interactions? Glob Chang Biol 19:1417–1423. doi:10.1111/gcb.12166
Davies TW, Bennie J, Inger R, Gaston KJ (2013b) Artificial light alters natural regimes of night-time sky brightness. Sci Rep 3:1–6. doi:10.1038/srep01722
De Jong M, Ouyang JQ, Da Silva A et al (2015) Effects of nocturnal illumination on life history decisions and fitness in wild birds. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 370:20140128
Dominoni DM (2015) The effects of light pollution on biological rhythms of birds: an integrated, mechanistic perspective. J Ornithol. doi:10.1007/s10336-015-1196-3
Dominoni DM, Partecke J (2015) Does light pollution alter daylength? A test using light-loggers on free-ranging European blackbirds (Turdus merula). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 370:20140118
Dominoni D, Helm B, Lehmann M et al (2013a) Clocks for the city: circadian differences between forest and city songbirds. Proc R Soc Lond B 280:20130593
Dominoni D, Quetting M, Partecke J (2013b) Artificial light at night advances avian reproductive physiology. Proc R Soc Lond B 280:20123017
Dominoni DM, Goymann W, Helm B, Partecke J (2013c) Urban-like night illumination reduces melatonin release in European blackbirds (Turdus merula): implications of city life for biological time-keeping of songbirds. Front Zool 10:60. doi:10.1186/1742-9994-10-60
Dominoni DM, Carmona-Wagner EO, Hofmann M et al (2014) Individual-based measurements of light intensity provide new insights into the effects of artificial light at night on daily rhythms of urban-dwelling songbirds. J Anim Ecol 83:681–692. doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12150
Dominoni DM, Van’t Hof TJ, Partecke J (2015) Social cues are unlikely to be the single cause for early reproduction in urban European blackbirds (Turdus merula). Physiol Behav 142:14–19. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.01.026
Dominoni DM, Borniger JC, Nelson RJ (2016) Light at night, clocks and health: from humans to wild organisms. Biol Lett 12(2):20160015. doi:http://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0015
Follett BK, Farner DS, Morton ML (1967) The effects of alternating long and short daily photoperiods on gonadal growth and pituitary gonadotropins in the white-crowned sparrow, Zonotrichia leucophrys gambelii. Biol Bull 133:330
Foster RG, Kreitzmann L (2004) Rhythms of life: The biological clocks that control the daily lives of every living thing. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
Fuller RA, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Daytime noise predicts nocturnal singing in urban robins. Biol Lett 3:368–370. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0134
Gaston KJ, Davies TW, Bennie J, Hopkins J (2012) Reducing the ecological consequences of night-time light pollution: options and developments. J Appl Ecol 49:1256–1266. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02212.x
Hale JD, Davies G, Fairbrass AJ et al (2013) Mapping lightscapes: spatial patterning of artificial lighting in an urban landscape. PLoS One 8:e61460. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061460
Kantermann T, Juda M, Vetter C, Roenneberg T (2010) Shift-work research: Where do we stand, where should we go? Sleep Biol Rhythm 8:95–105
Kempenaers B, Borgström P, Loës P et al (2010) Artificial night lighting affects dawn song, extra-pair siring success, and lay date in songbirds. Curr Biol 20:1735–1739
Kronfeld-Schor N, Dominoni D, de la Iglesia H et al (2013) Chronobiology by moonlight. Proc R Soc Lond B 280:20123088
Kunc HP, Amrhein V, Naguib M (2005) Seasonal variation in dawn song characteristics in the common nightingale. Anim Behav 70:1265–1271. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.02.010
Lambrechts MM, Perret P (2000) A long photoperiod overrides non-photoperiodic factors in blue tits’ timing of reproduction. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 267:585
Longcore T, Rich C, Mineau P et al (2013) Avian mortality at communication towers in the United States and Canada: which species, how many, and where? Biol Conserv 158:410–419. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.09.019
McNamara JM, Houston AI (2008) Optimal annual routines: behaviour in the context of physiology and ecology. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 363:301. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2141
McNamara JM, Mace R, Houston AI (1987) Optimal daily routines of singing and foraging in a bird singing to attract a mate. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:399–405
Miller MW (2006) Apparent effects of light pollution on singing behavior of American robins. Condor 108:130. doi:10.1650/0010-5422(2006)108[0130:AEOLPO]2.0.CO;2
Nordt A, Klenke R (2013) Sleepless in town – drivers of the temporal shift in dawn song in urban European blackbirds. PLoS One 8, e71476. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071476
Partecke J, Van’t Hof TJ, Gwinner E (2005) Underlying physiological control of reproduction in urban and forest-dwelling European blackbirds Turdus merula. J Avian Biol 36:295–305
Peirson SN, Halford S, Foster RG (2009) The evolution of irradiance detection: melanopsin and the non-visual opsins. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 364:2849–2865. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0050
Rich C, Longcore T (2006) Ecological consequences of artificial night lighting. Island Press, Washington, DC
Roenneberg T, Foster RGG (1997) Twilight times: light and the circadian system. Photochem Photobiol 66:549–561
Rotics S, Dayan T, Kronfeld-Schor N (2011) Effect of artificial night lighting on temporally partitioned spiny mice. J Mammal 92:159–168
Saggese K, Korner-Nievergelt F, Slagsvold T, Amrhein V (2011) Wild bird feeding delays start of dawn singing in the great tit. Anim Behav 81:361–365. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.11.008
Spoelstra K, van Grunsven RHA, Donners M et al (2015) Experimental illumination of natural habitat – direct and indirect ecological consequences of artificial light of different spectral composition. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 370:20140129
Stephan B (1985) Die Amsel-Turdus merula. Die Neue Brehm-Bücherei Bd. 95. Westarp Wissenschaften, Hohenwarsleben
Stone EL, Jones G, Harris S (2009) Street lighting disturbs commuting bats. Curr Biol 19:1123–1127
Te Marvelde L, Schaper SV, Visser ME (2012) A single long day triggers follicle growth in captive female great tits (Parus major) in winter but does not affect laying dates in the wild in spring. PLoS One 7, e35617
Thomas RJ, Székely T, Cuthill IC et al (2002) Eye size in birds and the timing of song at dawn. Proc Biol Sci 269:831–837. doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1941
Van Geffen KG, van Grunsven RHA, van Ruijven J et al (2014) Artificial light at night causes diapause inhibition and sex-specific life history changes in a moth. Ecol Evol 4:2082–2089. doi:10.1002/ece3.1090
Acknowledgments
I first would like to thank Jesko Partecke and Barbara Helm for invaluable supervision and support throughout my years as a PhD student and young postdoc. I acknowledge the help, support and input originated from discussions with several people including Michaela Hau, Tim Greives, Catarina Miranda, Adam Fudickar, Till Roenneberg, Martin Wikelski, Bart Kranstauber, Marcel Visser, Kamiel Spoelstra and many others. Bruno Erne and Georg Heine have provided me with exceptional light loggers in a very brief time. Last but not least, I acknowledge that the initial idea of using light loggers on individual free-living birds is ownership of Prof. Eberhard Gwinner, whom I never met but whose legacy has profoundly influenced large part of my work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dominoni, D.M. (2017). Ecological Effects of Light Pollution: How Can We Improve Our Understanding Using Light Loggers on Individual Animals?. In: Murgui, E., Hedblom, M. (eds) Ecology and Conservation of Birds in Urban Environments. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43314-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43314-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43312-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43314-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)