Abstract
Oocyte cryopreservation has several potential applications in human assisted reproduction technology, such as to maximize cycle cumulative outcome, limit the number of embryos generated for fresh embryo transfer, and support programs of fertility preservation and oocyte donation. Mature oocytes are intrinsically more susceptible to cryodamage compared with embryos. Fully grown immature oocytes are even less amenable to cryopreservation, due to the necessity to preserve morpho-functional relationship with companion cumulus cells. Consequently, not surprisingly, initial attempts aimed at cryostoring oocytes with conventional controlled rate slow-cooling (CRSC) protocols were frustrated by low survival rates and poor clinical outcomes. Several studies have confirmed that cryopreservation, if performed with suboptimal protocols, generates diverse types of cell damage, such as zona pellucida rupture, release of cortical granules, ultrastructural damage, and alterations in cell cycle regulation. Notwithstanding, perseverant and systematic research efforts have led to improved slow-cooling protocols that, although unable to increase survival rates above 75–80%, can achieve clinical outcomes that, if assessed in terms of number of implantations per number of thawed oocytes, are comparable with those obtained by vitrification. Younger patients seem to benefit particularly from oocyte CRSC, while results from older women are rather disappointing even beyond the expected effect of female age. The health of babies derived from oocytes stored by CRSC has been investigated. Relevant studies are few and numerically limited but do not suggest a health impact of cryopreservation. Overall, over the last decade, oocyte cryopreservation by CRSC has been replaced by vitirification. However, some intrinsic advantages of CRSC should not be overlooked, such as a higher reproducibility of protocols and automated monitoring of cooling phases.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Pacheco F, Oktay K. Current success and efficiency of autologous ovarian transplantation: a meta-analysis. Reprod Sci. SAGE PublicationsSage CA: Los Angeles, CA. 2017;24(8):1111–20.
Wang H, Racowsky C, Combelles CMH. Is it best to cryopreserve human cumulus-free immature oocytes before or after in vitro maturation? Cryobiology. 2012;65(2):79–87.
Brambillasca F, Guglielmo M-C, Coticchio G, Mignini Renzini M, Canto M, Fadini R. The current challenges to efficient immature oocyte cryopreservation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(12):1531–9.
VandeVoort CA, Leibo SP. Effect of cooling and exposure to ethylene glycol on in vitro maturation and embryo development of rhesus oocytes. Cryo Letters. 2005;26(5):305–12.
Anderson E, Albertini DF. Gap junctions between the oocyte and companion follicle cells in the mammalian ovary. J Cell Biol. 1976;71(2):680–6.
Toth TL, Baka SG, Veeck LL, Jones HW, Muasher S, Lanzendorf SE. Fertilization and in vitro development of cryopreserved human prophase I oocytes. Fertil Steril. 1994;61(5):891–4.
Toth TL, Lanzendorf SE, Sandow BA, Veeck LL, Hassen WA, Hansen K, et al. Cryopreservation of human prophase I oocytes collected from unstimulated follicles. Fertil Steril. 1994;61(6):1077–82.
Son WY, Park SE, Lee KA, Lee WS, Ko JJ, Yoon TK, et al. Effects of 1,2-propanediol and freezing-thawing on the in vitro developmental capacity of human immature oocytes. Fertil Steril. 1996;66(6):995–9.
De Santis L, Gandolfi F, Pennarossa G, Maffei S, Gismano E, Intra G, et al. Expression and intracytoplasmic distribution of staufen and calreticulin in maturing human oocytes. J Assist Reprod Genet Springer US. 2015;32(4):645–52.
Bianchi V, Coticchio G, Distratis V, Di Giusto N, Flamigni C, Borini A. Differential sucrose concentration during dehydration (0.2 Mol/l) and rehydration (0.3 Mol/l) increases the implantation rate of frozen human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14(1):64–71.
Fabbri R, Porcu E, Marsella T, Rocchetta G, Venturoli S, Flamigni C. Human oocyte cryopreservation: new perspectives regarding oocyte survival. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(3):411–6.
De Santis L, Coticchio G, Paynter S, Albertini D, Hutt K, Cino I, et al. Permeability of human oocytes to ethylene glycol and their survival and spindle configurations after slow cooling cryopreservation. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(10):2776–83.
Gook DA, Osborn SM, Johnston WI. Cryopreservation of mouse and human oocytes using 1,2-propanediol and the configuration of the meiotic spindle. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(7):1101–9.
Sathananthan AH, Trounson A, Freemann L, Brady T. The effects of cooling human oocytes. Hum Reprod. 1988;3(8):968–77.
Van Blerkom J, Davis PW. Cytogenetic, cellular, and developmental consequences of cryopreservation of immature and mature mouse and human oocytes. Microsc Res Tech. 1994;27(2):165–93.
Stachecki JJ, Cohen J, Willadsen SM. Cryopreservation of unfertilized mouse oocytes: the effect of replacing sodium with choline in the freezing medium. Cryobiology. 1998;37(4):346–54.
Quintans CJ, Donaldson MJ, Bertolino MV, Pasqualini RS. Birth of two babies using oocytes that were cryopreserved in a choline-based freezing medium. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(12):3149–52.
Ghetler Y, Skutelsky E, Ben Nun I, Ben Dor L, Amihai D, Shalgi R. Human oocyte cryopreservation and the fate of cortical granules. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(1):210–6.
Porcu E, Fabbri R, Seracchioli R, Ciotti PM, Magrini O, Flamigni C. Birth of a healthy female after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of cryopreserved human oocytes. Fertil Steril. 1997;68(4):724–6.
Borini A, Bonu MA, Coticchio G, Bianchi V, Cattoli M, Flamigni C. Pregnancies and births after oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(3):601–5.
Levi Setti PE, Albani E, Novara PV, Cesana A, Morreale G. Cryopreservation of supernumerary oocytes in IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(2):370–5.
Kuwayama M. Highly efficient vitrification for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos: the Cryotop method. Theriogenology. 2007;67(1):73–80.
Cobo A, Kuwayama M, Pérez S, Ruiz A, Pellicer A, Remohí J. Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(6):1657–64.
Gook DA, Schiewe MC, Osborn SM, Asch RH, Jansen RP, Johnston WI. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo development of human oocytes cryopreserved using 1,2-propanediol. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(10):2637–41.
Li X-H, Chen S-U, Zhang X, Tang M, Kui Y-R, Wu X, et al. Cryopreserved oocytes of infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology could be an important source of oocyte donation: a clinical report of successful pregnancies. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(12):3390–4.
Nottola SA, Macchiarelli G, Coticchio G, Bianchi S, Cecconi S, De Santis L, et al. Ultrastructure of human mature oocytes after slow cooling cryopreservation using different sucrose concentrations. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(4):1123–33.
Gualtieri R, Iaccarino M, Mollo V, Prisco M, Iaccarino S, Talevi R. Slow cooling of human oocytes: ultrastructural injuries and apoptotic status. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(4):1023–34.
Nottola SA, Coticchio G, De Santis L, Macchiarelli G, Maione M, Bianchi S, et al. Ultrastructure of human mature oocytes after slow cooling cryopreservation with ethylene glycol. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(3):368–77.
Nottola SA, Coticchio G, Sciajno R. Ultrastructural changes in human metaphase II oocytes cryopreserved by vitrifcation. The 24th annual meeting of the ESRE; 2008.
Coticchio G, Dal Canto M, Fadini R, Mignini Renzini M, Guglielmo M-C, Miglietta S, et al. Ultrastructure of human oocytes after in vitro maturation. Mol Hum Reprod. 2016;22(2):110–8.
Schalkoff ME, Oskowitz SP, Powers RD. Ultrastructural observations of human and mouse oocytes treated with cryopreservatives. Biol Reprod. 1989;40(2):379–93.
Nottola SA, Coticchio G, Sciajno R, Gambardella A, Maione M, Scaravelli G, et al. Ultrastructural markers of quality in human mature oocytes vitrified using cryoleaf and cryoloop. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19(Suppl 3):17–27.
Borini A, Sciajno R, Bianchi V, Sereni E, Flamigni C, Coticchio G. Clinical outcome of oocyte cryopreservation after slow cooling with a protocol utilizing a high sucrose concentration. Hum Reprod. 2006;126:443–50.
Cobo A, Diaz C. Clinical application of oocyte vitrification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril Elsevier Ltd. 2011;96(2):277–85.
Fissore RA, Kurokawa M, Knott J, Zhang M, Smyth J. Mechanisms underlying oocyte activation and postovulatory ageing. Reproduction. 2002;124(6):745–54.
Ozil JP, Huneau D. Activation of rabbit oocytes: the impact of the Ca2+ signal regime on development. Development. 2001;128(6):917–28.
Nottola SA, Albani E, Coticchio G, Palmerini MG, Lorenzo C, Scaravelli G, et al. Freeze/thaw stress induces organelle remodeling and membrane recycling in cryopreserved human mature oocytes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(12):1559–70.
Chian R-C, Gilbert L, Huang JYJ, Demirtas E, Holzer H, Benjamin A, et al. Live birth after vitrification of in vitro matured human oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(2):372–6.
Chian R-C, Huang JYJ, Gilbert L, Son W-Y, Holzer H, Cui SJ, et al. Obstetric outcomes following vitrification of in vitro and in vivo matured oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(6):2391–8.
Imesch P, Scheiner D, Xie M, Fink D, Macas E, Dubey R, et al. Developmental potential of human oocytes matured in vitro followed by vitrification and activation. J Ovarian Res BioMed Central. 2013;6(1):30.
Steinman RM, Mellman IS, Muller WA, Cohn ZA. Endocytosis and the recycling of plasma membrane. J Cell Biol The Rockefeller University Press. 1983;96(1):1–27.
Bogliolo L, Ariu F, Fois S, Rosati I, Zedda MT, Leoni G, et al. Morphological and biochemical analysis of immature ovine oocytes vitrified with or without cumulus cells. Theriogenology. 2007;68(8):1138–49.
Borini A, Bogliolo L, Coticchio G, Nicoli A. Activity of maturation promoting factor (MPF), but not microtubule-activated protein kinase (MAPK) decreases over time in frozen thawed human oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:i88.
Bromfield JJ, Coticchio G, Hutt K, Sciajno R, Borini A, Albertini DF. Meiotic spindle dynamics in human oocytes following slow-cooling cryopreservation. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(9):2114–23.
Parmegiani L, Cognigni GE, Bernardi S, Ciampaglia W, Infante F, Pocognoli P, et al. Freezing within 2 h from oocyte retrieval increases the efficiency of human oocyte cryopreservation when using a slow freezing/rapid thawing protocol with high sucrose concentration. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(8):1771–7.
Parmegiani L, Bertocci F, Garello C, Salvarani MC, Tambuscio G, Fabbri R. Efficiency of human oocyte slow freezing: results from five assisted reproduction centres. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18(3):352–9.
Bárcena P, Rodríguez M, Obradors A, Vernaeve V, Vassena R. Should we worry about the clock? Relationship between time to ICSI and reproductive outcomes in cycles with fresh and vitrified oocytes. Hum Reprod Oxford University Press. 2016;31(6):1182–91.
De Santis L, Cino I, Rabellotti E, Papaleo E, Calzi F, Fusi FM, et al. Oocyte cryopreservation: clinical outcome of slow-cooling protocols differing in sucrose concentration. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14(1):57–63.
Chen S-U, Lien Y-R, Chen H-F, Chang L-J, Tsai Y-Y, Yang Y-S. Observational clinical follow-up of oocyte cryopreservation using a slow-freezing method with 1,2-propanediol plus sucrose followed by ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(7):1975–80.
Boldt J, Tidswell N, Sayers A, Kilani R, Cline D. Human oocyte cryopreservation: 5-year experience with a sodium-depleted slow freezing method. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13(1):96–100.
Lucena E, Bernal DP, Lucena C, Rojas A, Moran A, Lucena A. Successful ongoing pregnancies after vitrification of oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(1):108–11.
Gook DA, Edgar DH. Cryopreservation of the human female gamete: current and future issues. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(12):2938–40.
Edgar DH, Gook DA. How should the clinical efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation be measured? Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14(4):430–5.
Bianchi V, Lappi M, Bonu MA, Borini A. Oocyte slow freezing using a 0.2-0.3 M sucrose concentration protocol: is it really the time to trash the cryopreservation machine? Fertil Steril. 2012;97(5):1101–7.
Gook DA, Edgar DH. Implantation rates of embryos generated from slow cooled human oocytes from young women are comparable to those of fresh and frozen embryos from the same age group. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(12):1171–6.
Cobo A, Garrido N, Pellicer A, Remohí J. Six years’ experience in ovum donation using vitrified oocytes: report of cumulative outcomes, impact of storage time, and development of a predictive model for oocyte survival rate. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(6):1426–34.e1–8.
Porcu E, Fabbri R, Damiano G, Giunchi S, Fratto R, Ciotti PM, et al. Clinical experience and applications of oocyte cryopreservation. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2000;169(1-2):33–7.
Borini A, Cattoli M, Mazzone S, Trevisi MR, Nalon M, Iadarola I. Survey of 105 babies born after slow-cooling oocyte cryopreservation. Hum Reprod. 2007;88:sS3–S14.
Tur-Kaspa I, Gal M, Horvitz A. Genetics and health of children born from cryopreserved oocytes. Fertil Steril. 88:S14.
Maher B. Little consensus on egg freezing. Nat News Nature Publishing Group. 2007;449(7165):958.
Noyes N, Porcu E, Borini A. Over 900 oocyte cryopreservation babies born with no apparent increase in congenital anomalies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18(6):769–76.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Review Questions
-
1.
What are the limitations of oocyte slow-cooling approach?
-
2.
Are all the protocols adopted equivalent in term of survival and outcomes?
-
3.
Are data provided from invasive methods valuable to improve SC protocols?
-
4.
Are there any advantages in the laboratory management of female fertility preservation via slow cooling?
-
5.
Is it time to discontinue slow freezing?
Freezing
1.1 Freezing Solutions
Freezing Solution 1: | 1.5 mol/l PrOH |
1.08 ml PROH | |
6.92 ml PBS | |
2.00 ml PPS |
Freezing Solution 2: | 1.5 mol/l PrOH, 0.2 mol/l sucrose |
1.08 ml PROH | |
6.92 ml PBS | |
2.00 ml PPS | |
684 mg sucrose |
Notes
-
(a)
Freezing solutions must be stored at 4 °C. Warmed to room temperature (24−25 °C) before use.
-
(b)
All dehydration steps must be performed at room temperature.
Dehydration
-
(a)
For each oocyte (or group of oocytes), dispense 0.5 ml of the freezing solutions in separate wells of a 4-well plate.
-
(b)
Incubate sequentially oocytes in the freezing solutions according to the times indicated below.
Solution
Time
Freezing Solution 1
10 min
Freezing Solution 2
5 min
-
(c)
Load oocyte(s) into straw(s)
-
(d)
Seal straw(s)
Cooling to LN2 temperature
-
(a)
Place straws into the cryofreezer.
-
(b)
Run the controlled rate freezing program (see below).
Controlled rate freezing program
-
1.
Decrease temperature from +20 °C to –7 °C at a rate of −2 °C/min.
-
2.
“Hold” at –7 °C for 10 min.
-
3.
Perform manual seeding at about 30% of the “hold” ramp.
-
4.
Decrease temperature from −7 °C to –30 °C at a rate of −0.3 °C/min.
-
5.
Decrease temperature from −30 °C to −150 °C at a rate of −50 °C/min.
-
6.
Hold at –150 °C for 10 min.
-
7.
Transfer into LN2 for long-term storage.
Thawing
1.1 Thawing Solutions
Thawing Solution 1: | 1.0 mol/l PrOH, 0.3 mol/l sucrose |
0.72 ml PROH | |
7.28 ml PBS | |
2.00 ml PPS | |
1026 mg sucrose |
Thawing Solution 2: | 0.5 mol/l PrOH, 0.3 mol/l sucrose |
0.36 ml PROH | |
7.64 ml PBS | |
2.00 ml PPS | |
1026 mg sucrose |
Thawing Solution 3: | 0.3 mol/l sucrose |
8.00 ml PBS | |
2.00 ml PPS | |
1026 mg sucrose |
Thawing Solution 4: | |
8.00 ml PBS | |
2.00 ml PPS |
Note
-
(a)
Freezing solutions must be stored at 4 °C. Warmed to room temperature (24−25 °C) before use.
-
(b)
All dehydration steps must be performed at room temperature.
Thawing
-
(a)
For each oocyte (or group of oocytes), dispense 0.5 ml of the thawing solutions in separate wells of a 4-well plate.
-
(b)
Remove the straw from LN2 and keep at room temperature for 30 sec.
-
(c)
Transfer the straw in a + 30 °C water bath for 40 sec.
Rehydration
-
(d)
Release the oocyte(s) from straw(s).
-
(e)
Incubate sequentially the oocyte(s) in the freezing solutions according to the times indicated below.
Solution
Time
Thawing Solution 1
5 min
Thawing Solution 2
5 min
Thawing Solution 3
10 min
Thawing Solution 4
10 min
-
(f)
Transfer the oocyte(s) to 37 °C for 10 min, while in thawing solution 4 and after the initial incubation at room temperature.
-
(g)
Transfer the oocyte(s) in medium for oocyte culture and incubate under standard conditions for 60−90 min before microinjection.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coticchio, G., De Santis, L. (2019). Slow Freezing of Oocytes. In: Nagy, Z., Varghese, A., Agarwal, A. (eds) In Vitro Fertilization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43011-9_53
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43011-9_53
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43010-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43011-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)