Abstract
One third of all schools in the United States are located in rural areas, sharing characteristics that affect the way education is delivered. These include smaller average class sizes, geographic isolation, and reduced access to professional development for teachers. Despite their numbers, rural schools have historically been underrepresented in education research, particularly in rigorous studies. This chapter examines the recruitment of rural schools for education research, including an approach used to recruit Idaho schools for a cluster randomized trial. The authors describe how their approach addressed many of the unique features of rural schools. The focus on understanding local context, establishing personal connections, and offering high-quality professional development aligned with regional needs allowed the study team to recruit a sample that reflected the proportion of rural schools in the state. This proved to be an effective approach, although more expensive and time-consuming than recruitment efforts in urban and suburban settings. The authors conclude by discussing some considerations for researchers, as well as for funding agencies that wish to include rural school perspectives in future education research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We also experienced a particular situation in which Bloom’s (2006) hypothesis that moderator analyses often have more statistical power does not hold true: that is, when the interclass correlation of the subgroup is very low.
References
Arnold, M. L., Newman, J. H., Gaddy, B. B., & Dean, C. B. (2005). A look at the condition of rural education research: Setting a difference for future research. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(6). Retrieved from http://www.jrre.psu.edu/articles/20-6.pdf
Ballantyne, K. G., Sanderman, A. R., & Levy, J. (2008). Educating English language learners: Building teacher capacity. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. Retrieved from http://www.ncela.us/files/uploads/3/EducatingELLsBuildingTeacherCapacityVol1.pdf
Bloom, H. S. (2006). Randomizing groups to evaluate place-based programs. In H. S. Bloom (Ed.), Learning more from social experiments: Evolving analytical approaches (pp. 115–172). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Brechtel, M. (2001). Bringing it all together: Language and literacy in the multilingual classroom (Rev ed.). Carlsbad, CA: Dominie Press.
Capps, R., Fix, M., Murray, J., Ost, J., Passel, J. S., & Herwantoro, S. (2005). The new demography of America’s schools: Immigration and the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington DC: Urban Institute.
Dixon, M. (2013). Public education finances: 2011 (G11-ASPEF). Retrieved from U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau website: http://www2.census.gov/govs/school/11f33pub.pdf
Echevarria, J., Short, D., & Powers, K. (2006). School reform and standards-based education: A model for English-language learners. Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 195–211.
Gándara, P., Maxwell-Jolly, J., & Driscoll, A. (2005). Listening to teachers of English language learners: A survey of California teachers’ challenges, experiences, and professional development needs. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED491701).
Hannum, W. H., Irvin, M. J., Banks, J. B., & Farmer, T. W. (2009). Distance education use in rural schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 24(3), 1–15.
Howley, A., Wood, L., & Hough, B. (2011). Rural elementary school teachers’ technology integration. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 26(9). Retrieved from http://jrre.vmhost.psu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/26-9.pdf
Jimerson, L. (2005). Special challenges for the “No Child Left Behind” act for rural schools and districts. Rural Educator, 26(3), 1–4. Retrieved from ERIC database (EJ783827).
Khattri, N., Riley, K. W., & Kane, M. B. (1997). Students at risk in poor, rural areas: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 13(2), 79–100. Retrieved from http://jrre.vmhost.psu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/26-9.pdf
Lowenhaupt, R., & Camburn, E. (2011). Changing demographics in the schools: Wisconsin’s New Latino Diaspora (WCER Working Paper No. 2011-4). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
Migration Policy Institute. (2012). Number and share of English language learners by state: 2010–11. Retrieved February 1, 2015, from http://www.migrationpolicy.org/programs/data-hub/charts/number-and-share-english-language-learners-state?width=1000&height=850&iframe=true
Monk, D. H. (2007). Recruiting and retaining high-quality teachers in rural areas. Future of Children, 17(1), 155–174.
National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. (2011). The growing numbers of English learner students: 2009/10. Retrieved from http://www.ncela.us/files/uploads/9/growing_EL_0910.pdf
National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. (2014). NCELA Title III state profiles. Retrieved from http://www.ncela.us/t3sis
Passel, J. S., & Zimmerman, W. (2001). Are immigrants leaving California? Settlement patterns of immigrants in the late 1990s. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
Redwood, D., Leston, J., Asay, E., Ferucci, E., Etzel, R., & Lanier, A. P. (2011). Strategies for successful retention of Alaska Native and American Indian study participants. Journal of Primary Prevention, 32(1), 43–52.
Rhoads, C. H. (2011). The implications of “contamination” for experimental design in education. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 36(1), 76–104.
Roschelle, J., Feng, M., Gallagher, H., Murphy, R., Harris, C., Kamdar, D., et al. (2014). Recruiting participants for large-scale random assignment experiments in school settings. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
Slama, K. (2004, January). Rural culture is a diversity issue. Minnesota Psychologist, 9–11, 13. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/practice/programs/rural/rural-culture.pdf
Terrazas, A. (2011). Immigrants in new-destination states. Retrieved from Migration Policy Institute website: http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/immigrants-new-destination-states
U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau. (2013). “State & County QuickFacts: Idaho,” 2011. Retrieved January 10, 2013 from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/16000.html
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. (2015). “Funded research grants and contracts”, 2002–2014. Retrieved January 8, 2015 from http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Common core of data. Public elementary/secondary school universe survey”, 2008–09 (v. 1b). Retrieved January 2, 2014, from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/pubschuniv.asp
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). Common core of data. Public elementary/secondary school universe survey,” 2011–12 (v. 1a). Retrieved January 2, 2014, from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/pubschuniv.asp
Wagenfeld, M. O. (2003). A snapshot of rural and frontier America. In B. H. Stamm (Ed.), Rural behavioral health care: An interdisciplinary guide (pp. 33–40). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Acknowledgments
The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305A100583 to Education Northwest. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Autio, E., Deussen, T. (2017). Recruiting Rural Schools for Education Research: Challenges and Strategies. In: Nugent, G., Kunz, G., Sheridan, S., Glover, T., Knoche, L. (eds) Rural Education Research in the United States. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42940-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42940-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42938-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42940-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)