Skip to main content

Post-operative Findings/Recurrent Disease

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Breast Oncology: Techniques, Indications, and Interpretation

Abstract

Breast cancer treatment has evolved since William Halsted, MD, an American surgeon, introduced the radical mastectomy in 1882 (Halsted, Ann Surg 20:497, 1894). The modified radical mastectomy gained popularity in the 1970s (www.cancer.org/cancer/cancerbasics/thehistoryofcancer/the-history-of-cancer-cancer-treatment-surgery. Accessed 11/23/2015) and in 1985. Fisher et al. established lumpectomy, or breast conservation therapy (BCT), and radiation as treatment for early stage breast cancers (Fisher et al., N Engl J Med 312(11):665–673, 1985). The National Institutes of Health soon endorsed and thus popularized this less invasive treatment (Consensus statement: treatment of early-stage breast cancer. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1992;11:1–5. Review). Today, while BCT and radiation remain the standard of care for stage I and II cancers, mastectomy and reconstruction procedures have been updated and rising ipsilateral and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates have been documented (Jones et al., Ann Surg Oncol 16(10):2691–2696, 2009; Tuttle et al., J Clin Oncol 25(33):5203–5209, 2007; McGuire et al., Ann Surg Oncol 16(10):2682–2690, 2009; Dragun et al., Am J Clin Oncol 36(4):375–380, 2013).

As women survive their breast cancers and continue screening with mammogram, ultrasound and often MRI, differentiating multi-modality post-operative and post-radiation changes from signs of malignancy is key both for the avoidance of unnecessary biopsies and for the early detection of subsequent cancers in this elevated risk population. In this chapter, we will cover normal post-lumpectomy and post-radiation findings on mammogram, ultrasound, and MRI and contrast these post-treatment changes with imaging features of recurrent cancers. We will also discuss mastectomy techniques, including the modified radical mastectomy and skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomies together with autologous and implant reconstructions, along with tips for avoiding common pitfalls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Morrow M, Strom EA, Bassett LW, et al. Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:277–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tatter PI, Kaplan J, Bleiweiss I, et al. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2000;179:81–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;88(3):553–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Merrill AL, Coopey SB, Tang R, et al. Implications of new lumpectomy margin guidelines for breast conservation surgery: changes in reexcision rates and predicted rates of residual tumor. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;23(3):729–34 [Epub ahead of print].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mendelson EB. Evaluation of the postoperative breast. Radiol Clin North Am. 1992;30:107–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dershaw DD. Mammography in patients with breast cancer treated with breast conservation (lumpectomy with or without radiation). AJR. 1995;164:309–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gutierrez R, Horst KC, Dirbas FM, Ikeda DM. Breast imaging following breast conservation therapy. Breast surgical techniques and interdisciplinary management. F.M. Dirbas and C.E.H. Scott-Conner (eds.) Springer 2011 Edition. DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-6076-4_81

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rahbar H, Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Thursten B, Lehman CD. Clinical and technical considerations for high quality breast MRI at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;37(4):778–90. doi:10.1002/jmri.23834.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bedair R, Graves MJ, Patterson AJ, McLean MA, Manavaki R, Wallace T, Reid S, Mendichovszky I, Griffiths J, Gilbert FJ. Effect of radiofrequency transmit field correction on quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 T. Radiology. 2015;279(2):368–77, 150920.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson SJ, Wapnir I, Dignam JJ, et al. Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrence in patients treated by breast-conservation therapy in five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocols of node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(15):2466–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ingham SL, Sperrin M, Baildam A, Ross GL, Clayton R, Lalloo F, et al. Risk-reducing surgery increases survival in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers unaffected at time of family referral. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;142:611–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Loukas M, Tubbs RS, Mirzayan N, Shirak M, Steinberg A, Shoja MM. The history of mastectomy. Am Surg. 2011;77(5):566–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Toth BA, Lappert P. Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87(6):1048–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Voltura AM, Tsangaris TN, Rosson GD, Jacobs LK, Flores JI, Singh NK, Argani P, Balch CM. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: critical assessment of 51 procedures and implications for selection criteria. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(12):3396–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Torresan RZ, dos Santos CC, Okamura H, Alvarenga M. Evaluation of residual glandular tissue after skin-sparing mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12(12):1037–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chung AP, Sacchini V. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: where are we now? Surg Oncol. 2008 Dec;17(4):261–6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L. Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with 13 years median follow-up in 216 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:143–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jatoi I, Kaufmann M, Petit JY. Atlas of breast surgery. Heidelberg: Springer; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sternberg EG, Perdikis G, McLaughlin SA, Terkonda SP, Waldorf JC. Latissimus dorsi flap remains an excellent choice for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56(1):31–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Garvey PB, Buchel EW, Pockaj BA, et al. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(6):1711–9 ; discussion 1720–1721.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tachi M, Yamada A. Choice of flaps for breast reconstruction. Int J Clin Oncol. 2005;10(5):289–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Surgeons ASoP. 2014 Reconstructive Plastic Surgery Statistics 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(1):15–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Serletti JM, Fosnot J, Nelson JA, Disa JJ, Bucky LP. Breast reconstruction after breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(6):124e–35e; Colwell AS. Current strategies with 1-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction. Gland Surg. 2015;4(2):111–5.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stevens WG, Hirsch EM, Tenenbaum MJ, Acevedo M. A prospective study of 708 form-stable silicone gel breast implants. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30(5):693–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Walker PS, Walls B, DK M. Silicone implants Natrelle saline-filled breast implants: a prospective 10-year study. Aesthet Surg J. 2009;29(1):19–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hölmich LR, Friis S, Fryzek JP, et al. Incidence of silicone breast implant rupture. Arch Surg. 2003;138(7):801–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cunningham B, McCue J. Safety and effectiveness of Mentor’s MemoryGel implants at 6 years. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33(3):440–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Juanpere S, Perez E, Huc O, et al. Imaging of breast implants—a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2011;2(6):653–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Nimboriboonporn A, Chuthapisith S. Nipple-areola complex reconstruction. Gland Surg. 2014;3(1):35–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Honegger MM, Hesseltine SM, Gross JD, Singer C, Cohen JM. Tattoo pigment mimicking axillary lymph node calcifications on mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183(3):831–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy Melsaether MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Melsaether, A., Gao, Y. (2017). Post-operative Findings/Recurrent Disease. In: Heller, S., Moy, L. (eds) Breast Oncology: Techniques, Indications, and Interpretation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42563-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42563-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42561-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42563-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics