Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Esophageal Motility Testing: The Present and the Future

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Diagnosis and Endoscopic Management of Digestive Diseases

  • 755 Accesses

Abstract

Motor function can be assessed by a variety of recording techniques including radiology, scintigraphy manometry, and most recently intraluminal electrical impedance monitoring. The gold standard, however, for the assessment of motor disorders remains manometry. Since its introduction in the early 1950s, esophageal manometry has contributed to a better understanding of esophageal motor function and has currently become a widely performed technique in clinical practice. In the last 10 years, a new system to perform esophageal manometry was developed and introduced in both research and clinical setting: the high-resolution manometry. It utilizes closely spaced pressure sensors to create a dynamic representation of pressure change along the entire length of the esophagus. Along with the technological innovation, an international consensus process has evolved over recent years to define esophageal motility disorders using HRM, Clouse plots, and standardized metrics. This classification, titled the Chicago Classification (CC), was firstly published in 2009 and updated in 2012 and in 2015 (v3.0). The key metrics of interpretation applied for the CC v3.0 are the integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), the distal contractile integral (DCI), and the distal latency (DL). In its last iteration, the CC utilizes a hierarchical approach, sequentially prioritizing (i) disorders of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow (achalasia subtypes I–III and EGJ outflow obstruction), (ii) major disorders of peristalsis (absent contractility, distal esophageal spasm, hypercontractile esophagus), and (iii) minor disorders of peristalsis characterized by impaired bolus transit (“fragmented” contractions in case of large breaks in the 20-mmHg isobaric contour, ineffective esophageal motility). EGJ morphology, characterized by the degree of overlap between the lower esophageal sphincter and the crural diaphragm, and baseline EGJ contractility are also part of CC v3.0. Future developments of CC will include pharyngeal and UES functions, combined impedance measurements to assess the bolus flow, and swallow challenges to trigger motility abnormalities. In summary, the CC is an evolving process and much remains to be elucidated in the next versions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Crane RK, editor. Gastrointestinal physiology II. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miller AJ. The neuroscientific principles of swallowing and dysphagia. San Diego: Singular Pub. Group; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Code CF. An Atlas of esophageal motility in health and disease. Springfield: Thomas; 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fransen G, Valembois P. Basic data anatomy and embryology. In: Vantrappen G, Hellemans J, editors. Diseases of the Esophagus. New York: Springer; 1978. p. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Murray JA, Clouse RE, Conklin JL. Component of the standard oesophageal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2003;15:591–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Butin JW, Olsen AM, Moersch HJ, Code CF. A study of esophageal pressures in normal persons and patients with cardiospasm. Gastroenterology. 1953;23:278–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dent J. A new technique for continuous sphincter pressure measurement. Gastroenterology. 1976;71:263–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Soudagar AS, Sayuk GS, Gyawali CP. Learners favor high resolution oesophageal manometry with better diagnostic accuracy over conventional line tracings. Gut. 2012;61(6):798–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pandolfino JE, Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ, et al. High-resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009;21(8):796–806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal esophageal pressure topography (EPT). Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24 Suppl 1:57–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Gyawali CP, Roman S, Smout AMJP, Pandolfino JE, International High Resolution Manometry Working Group. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(2):160–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Clouse RE, Staiano A. Topography of the esophageal peristaltic pressure wave. Am J Physiol. 1991;261(4 Pt 1):G677–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Clouse RE, Staiano A, Alrakawi A, Harolan A. Application of topographical methods to clinical esophageal manometry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:2720–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Zhang Q, Jarosz A, Shah N, Kahrilas PJ. Quantifying EGJ morphology and relaxation with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;290:G1033–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bredenoord AJ, Weusten BL, Timmer R, Smout AJ. Intermittent spatial separation of diaphragm and lower esophageal sphincter favors acidic and weakly acidic reflux. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:334–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pandolfino JE, Kim H, Ghosh SK, et al. High-resolution manometry of the EGJ: an analysis of crural diaphragm function in GERD. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(5):1056–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tolone S, de Cassan C, de Bortoli N, Roman S, Galeazzi F, Salvador R, Marabotto E, Furnari M, Zentilin P, Marchi S, Bardini R, Sturniolo GC, Savarino V, Savarino E. Esophagogastric junction morphology is associated with a positive impedance-pH monitoring in patients with GERD. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(8):1175–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tolone S, de Bortoli N, Marabotto E, de Cassan C, Bodini G, Roman S, Furnari M, Savarino V, Cocimo L, Savarino E. Esophagogastric junction contractility for clinical assessment in patients with GERD: a real added value? Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(10):1423–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin Z, Kahrilas PJ, Roman S, et al. Refining the criterion for an abnormal integrated relaxation pressure in esophageal pressure topography based on the pattern of esophageal contractility using a classification and regression tree model. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24(8):e356–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Salvador R, Savarino E, Pesenti E, Spadotto L, Capovilla G, Cavallin F, Galeazzi F, Nicoletti L, Merigliano S, Costantini M. The impact of Heller myotomy on integrated relaxation pressure in esophageal achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(1):125–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Scherer JR, Kwiatek MA, Soper NJ, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. Functional esophagogastric junction obstruction with intact peristalsis: a heterogeneous syndrome sometimes akin to achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:2219–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gyawali CP, Kushnir VM. High-resolution manometric characteristics help differentiate types of distal esophageal obstruction in patients with peristalsis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;23:502–e197.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kahrilas PJ, Peters JH. Evaluation of esophagogastric junction using high resolution manometry and esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24(1):11–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. van Hoeij FB, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. Characterization of idiopathic esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(9):1310–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Xiao Y, Kahrilas PJ, Kwasny MJ, Roman S, Lin Z, Nicodeme F, Lu C, Pandolfino JE. High-resolution manometry correlates of ineffective esophageal motility. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1647–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar N, Porter RF, Chanin JM, Gyawali CP. Analysis of intersegmental trough and proximal latency of smooth muscle contraction using high-resolution esophageal manometry. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;46:375–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Roman S, Lin Z, Kwiatek MA, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. Weak peristalsis in esophageal pressure topography: classification and association with dysphagia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:349–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Porter R, Kumar N, Drapekin J, Gyawali CP. Fragmented smooth muscle contraction segments on high resolution manometry: a marker of esophageal hypomotility. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24:763–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pandolfino JE, Roman S, Carlson D, et al. Distal esophageal spasm in high-resolution esophageal pressure topography: defining clinical phenotypes. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(2):469–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Roman S, Pandolfino JE, Chen J, Boris L, Luger D, Kahrilas PJ. Phenotypes and clinical context of hypercontractility in high resolution pressure topography (EPT). Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:37–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Martinucci I, de Bortoli N, Giacchino M, Bodini G, Marabotto E, Marchi S, Savarino V, Savarino E. Esophageal motility abnormalities in gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2014;5(2):86–96.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Pandolfino JE, Roman S. High-resolution manometry: an atlas of esophageal motility disorders and findings of GERD using esophageal pressure topography. Thorac Surg Clin. 2011;21:465–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Savarino E, Tutuian R. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry testing. Dig Liver Dis Off J Ital Soc Gastroenterol Ital Assoc Stud Liver. 2008;40:167–73.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Savarino E, Giacchino M, Savarino V. Dysmotility and reflux disease. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;21:548–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Savarino E, Gemignani L, Pohl D, Zentilin P, Dulbecco P, Assandri L, Marabotto E, et al. Oesophageal motility and bolus transit abnormalities increase in parallel with the severity of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34:476–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Diener U, Patti MG, Molena D, Fisichella PM, Way LW. Esophageal dysmotility and gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract. 2001;5:260–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ, Kern M, Arndorfer RC, Reece A. Esophageal peristaltic dysfunction in peptic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 1986;91:897–904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee J, Anggiansah A, Anggiansah R, Young A, Wong T, Fox M. Effects of age on the gastroesophageal junction, esophageal motility, and reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc. 2007;5:1392–8.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Simren M, Silny J, Holloway R, Tack J, Janssens J, Sifrim D. Relevance of ineffective oesophageal motility during oesophageal acid clearance. Gut. 2003;52:784–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Gyawali CP, Bredenoord AJ, Conklin JL, Fox M, Pandolfino JE, Peters JH, Roman S, et al. Evaluation of esophageal motor function in clinical practice. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25:99–133.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Basseri B, Pimentel M, Shaye OA, Low K, Soffer EE, Conklin JL. Apple sauce improves detection of esophageal motor dysfunction during high-resolution manometry evaluation of dysphagia. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:1723–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fornari F, Bravi I, Penagini R, Tack J, Sifrim D. Multiple rapid swallowing: a complementary test during standard oesophageal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil Off J Eur Gastrointest Motil Soc. 2009;21:718–e741.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Stoikes N, Drapekin J, Kushnir V, Shaker A, Brunt LM, Gyawali CP. The value of multiple rapid swallows during preoperative esophageal manometry before laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:3401–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Shaker A, Stoikes N, Drapekin J, Kushnir V, Brunt LM, Gyawali CP. Multiple rapid swallow responses during esophageal high-resolution manometry reflect esophageal body peristaltic reserve. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:1706–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Martinucci I, Savarino EV, Pandolfino JE, Russo S, Bellini M, Tolone S, Tutuian R, Roman S, Furnari M, Frazzoni M, Macchia L, Savarino V, Marchi S, de Bortoli N. Vigor of peristalsis during multiple rapid swallows is inversely correlated with acid exposure time in patients with NERD. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28(2):243–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Omari TI, Dejaeger E, van Beckevoort D, Goeleven A, Davidson GP, Dent J, Tack J, Rommel N. A method to objectively assess swallow function in adults with suspected aspiration. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1454–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Omari TI, Kritas S, Cock C, Besanko L, Burgstad C, Thompson A, Rommel N, Heddle R, et al. Swallowing dysfunction in healthy older people using pharyngeal pressure-flow analysis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;26:59–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Omari TI, Papathanasopoulos A, Dejaeger E, Wauters L, Scarpellini E, Vos R, Slootmaekers S, Seghers V, et al. Reproducibility and agreement of pharyngeal automated impedance manometry with videofluoroscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:862–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lin Z, Imam H, Nicodeme F, Carlson DA, Lin CY, Yim B, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE. Flow time through esophagogastric junction derived during high-resolution impedance-manometry studies: a novel parameter for assessing esophageal bolus transit. Am J Physiol. 2014;307:G158–63. pii:ajpgi.00119.2014.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Rommel N, Van Oudenhove L, Tack J, Omari TI. Automated impedance manometry analysis as a method to assess esophageal function. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;26:636–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Translational Research and New Technology in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

    Nicola de Bortoli

  2. Digestive Pathophysiology Unit, Baggiovara Hospital, Modena, Italy

    Marzio Frazzoni

  3. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy

    Edoardo V. Savarino MD

Authors
  1. Nicola de Bortoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marzio Frazzoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Edoardo V. Savarino MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edoardo V. Savarino MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. S. Agostino Estense Hospital, Modena, Italy

    Rita Conigliaro

  2. S. Agostino Estense Hospital, Modena, Italy

    Marzio Frazzoni

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Bortoli, N., Frazzoni, M., Savarino, E.V. (2017). Esophageal Motility Testing: The Present and the Future. In: Conigliaro, R., Frazzoni, M. (eds) Diagnosis and Endoscopic Management of Digestive Diseases. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42358-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42358-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42356-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42358-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation