Abstract
The paper presents work on implementation of semantic technologies within a geospatial environment to provide a common base for further semantic interpretation. The work adds on the current works in similar areas where priorities are more on spatial data integration. We assert that having a common unified semantic view on heterogeneous datasets provides a dimension that allows us to extend beyond conventional concepts of searchability, reusability, composability and interoperability of digital geospatial data. It provides contextual understanding on geodata that will enhance effective interpretations through possible reasoning capabilities. We highlight this through use cases in disaster management and planned land use that are significantly different. This paper illustrates the work that firstly follows existing Semantic Web standards when dealing with vector geodata and secondly extends current standards when dealing with raster geodata and more advanced geospatial operations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16.
- 17.
- 18.
Example Codelists of INSPIRE: http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/.
- 19.
Quantities, Units, Dimensions and Data Types Ontology: http://www.qudt.org/.
- 20.
- 21.
Extract Transfer Load.
- 22.
References
GeoSPARQL - a geography query language for RDF data (2016). http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/geosparql. Accessed 17 Mar 2016
National Strategy for Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP Strategy)
Socop, geospatial ontologies (2016). http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SOCoP/GeospatialOntologies. Accessed 16 Mar 2016
Arpinar, I.B., Sheth, A., Ramakrishnan, C., Usery, L., Azami, M.: Po kwan, M.: Geospatial ontology development and semantic analytics. In: Transactions in GIS, pp. 1–15. Blackwell Publishing, Boston (2005)
Athanasiou, S., Hladky, D., Giannopoulos, G., Garcia-Rojas, A., Lehmann, J.: GeoKnow: making the web an exploratory place for geospatial knowledge. Eur. Res. Consortium Inf. Math. News 96, 12–13 (2014)
Battle, R., Kolas, D.: GeoSPARQL: enabling a geospatial semantic web. Semant. Web J. 3(4), 355–370 (2011)
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web. Sci. Am. 284(5), 34–43 (2001). http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00048144-10D2-1C70-84A9809EC588EF21
Bizid, I., Faiz, S., Boursier, P., Yusuf, J.C.M.: Integration of heterogeneous spatial databases for disaster management. In: Parsons, J., Chiu, D. (eds.) ER Workshops 2013. LNCS, vol. 8697, pp. 77–86. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14139-8_10
Bossomaier, T., Hope, B.A.: Online GIS and Spatial Metadata. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2015)
Coppola, D.P.: Introduction to International Disaster Management. Elsevier, Burlington (2011)
Cruz, I.F.: Geospatial data integration. Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois, Chicago, ADVIS Lab (2004)
García-Castro, R., Gómez-Pérez, A., Munoz-Garcia, O.: The semantic web framework: a component-based framework for the development of semantic web applications. In: 2008 19th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Application, DEXA 2008, pp. 185–189. IEEE (2008)
Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquis. 5(2), 199–220 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/knac.1993.1008
Hacherouf, M., Bahloul, S.N., Cruz, C.: Transforming XML documents to OWL ontologies: a survey. J. Inf. Sci. 41(2), 242–259 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165551514565972
Howard, M., P.S.S.R.: Technical guidance for the INSPIRE schema transformation network service. version: 3.0, ec JRC contract notice 2009/s 107–153973 (2010)
Karmacharya, A.: Introduction of a spatial layer in the Semantic Web framework: a proposition through the Web platform ArchaeoKM. Ph.D. thesis, Le2i Laboratoire Electronique, Informatique et Image, University of Bourgogne (2011)
Lenzerini, M.: Data integration: a theoretical perspective. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-First ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, PODS 2002, pp. 233–246. ACM, NY, USA (2002). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/543613.543644
Müller, H., Würriehausen, F.: Semantic interoperability of German and European land-use information. In: Murgante, B., Misra, S., Carlini, M., Torre, C.M., Nguyen, H.-Q., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Gervasi, O. (eds.) ICCSA 2013, Part III. LNCS, vol. 7973, pp. 309–323. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39646-5_23
Navigli, R., Ponzetto, S.P.: Babelnet: building a very large multilingual semantic network. In: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 216–225. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)
OGC: OGC geosparql - a geographic query language for RDF data. Technical report (2011)
Rase, D., Björnsson, A., Probert, M., Haupt, M.: Reference data and metadata position paper. Inspire RDM PP v4–3 en. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (2002)
Waters, R., Beare, M., Walker, R., Millot, M.: Schema transformation for INSPIRE. Int. J. Spat. Data Infrastruct. Res. 6, 1–22 (2011)
Specifications, D.T.D.: D2.3: definition of annex themes and scope v3.0., European union (2008)
Stadler, C., Lehmann, J., Höffner, K., Auer, S.: Linkedgeodata: a core for a web of spatial open data. Seman. Web J. 3(4), 333–354 (2012). http://jens-lehmann.org/files/2012/linkedgeodata2.pdf
Tschirner, S., Scherp, A., Staab, S.: Semantic access to INSPIRE. In: Terra Cognita 2011 Workshop Foundations, Technologies and Applications of the Geospatial Web, p. 75. Citeseer (2011)
Tsinaraki, C., Christodoulakis, S.: XS2OWL: a formal model and a system for enabling XML schema applications to interoperate with OWL-DL domain knowledge and semantic web tools. In: Thanos, C., Borri, F., Candela, L. (eds.) Digital Libraries: Research and Development. LNCS, vol. 4877, pp. 124–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Würriehausen, F., Karmacharya, A., Müller, H.: Using ontologies to support land-use spatial data interoperability. In: Murgante, B., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2014, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8580, pp. 453–468. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09129-7_34
Zhao, T., Zhang, C., Wei, M., Peng, Z.-R.: Ontology-based geospatial data query and integration. In: Cova, T.J., Miller, H.J., Beard, K., Frank, A.U., Goodchild, M.F. (eds.) GIScience 2008. LNCS, vol. 5266, pp. 370–392. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87473-7_24
Acknowledgements
This project was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (https://www.bmbf.de/en/index.html Project Reference: 03FH032IX4).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Homburg, T. et al. (2016). Interpreting Heterogeneous Geospatial Data Using Semantic Web Technologies. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications -- ICCSA 2016. ICCSA 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9788. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42111-7_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42111-7_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42110-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42111-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)