Skip to main content

A Segmented Abstraction Hierarchy Model for Business Process Modeling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors, Business Management, Training and Education

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 498))

  • 2701 Accesses

Abstract

Business process modeling (BPM) typically focuses on the definition and refinement of standardized rules governing typical operations. The accommodation of extraordinary events is not usually addressed in BPM. A process model based on an abstraction hierarchy framework, however, could benefit by borrowing from the tools developed for ecologic interface design, which relies on underlying abstraction hierarchy models to provide adaptability in atypical conditions. In this work, a modified abstraction hierarchy model is proposed for application to general-purpose information systems. The new model explicitly includes both human and technologic components as an agent-based construct, and seeks to better define their interactions with data/information. The model is intended to act as a framework for guiding the development of robust business process models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These definitions of data and information allow for the future re-definition of “mind” if/when artificial intelligence systems are deemed worthy of that label. It also allows for the distinction between “brain” and “mind” as neurological parameters may be measured objectively, resulting in data, whereas thoughts might not.

References

  1. Rasmussen, J.: Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering, p. 228. Elsevier Science Inc. (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bisantz, A.M., Vicente, K.J.: Making the abstraction hierarchy concrete. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 40(1), 83–117 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aguilar-Savén, R.S.: Business process modelling: review and framework. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 90(2), 129–149 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Russell, N., et al.: On the suitability of UML 2.0 activity diagrams for business process modelling. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Asia-Pacific conference on Conceptual modelling, vol. 53, pp. 5–104. Australian Computer Society, Inc., Hobart (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chinosi, M., Trombetta, A.: BPMN: an introduction to the standard. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 34(1), 124–134 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dijkman, R.M., Dumas, M., Ouyang, C.: Semantics and analysis of business process models in BPMN. Inf. Softw. Technol. 50(12), 1281–1294 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wong, P.Y.H., Gibbons, J.: Formalisations and applications of BPMN. Sci. Comput. Program. 76(8), 633–650 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Wohed, P., et al.: On the suitability of BPMN for business process modelling. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) Business Process Management: 4th International Conference, BPM 2006, Vienna, Austria, 5–7 Sept 2006, pp. 161–176. Springer Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zur Muehlen, M., Recker, J.: How much language is enough? Theoretical and practical use of the business process modeling notation. In: Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rosemann, M.: Potential pitfalls of process modeling: part A. Bus. Process Manag. J. 12(2), 249–254 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McNeese, M.D., Perusich, K., Rentsch, J.R.: Advancing socio-technical systems design via the living laboratory. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 44(12), 2-610–2-613 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jones, A.C., McNeese, M.D.: Cognitive fieldwork in emergency crisis management: developing the I-T-P abstraction hierarchy. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 50(3), 501–505 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur C. Jones .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jones, A.C. (2017). A Segmented Abstraction Hierarchy Model for Business Process Modeling. In: Kantola, J., Barath, T., Nazir, S., Andre, T. (eds) Advances in Human Factors, Business Management, Training and Education. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 498. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42070-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42070-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42069-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42070-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics