Skip to main content

How the Strategy Continuity Influences the Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma Game with Interaction Stochasticity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trends in Applied Knowledge-Based Systems and Data Science (IEA/AIE 2016)

Abstract

The evolution of cooperation among selfish individuals is a fundamental issue in artificial intelligence. Recent work has revealed that interaction stochasticity can promote cooperation in evolutionary spatial prisoner’s dilemma games. Considering the players’ strategies in previous works are discrete (either cooperation or defection), we focus on the evolutionary spatial prisoner’s dilemma game with continuous strategy based on interaction stochasticity mechanism. In this paper, we find that strategy continuity do not enhance the cooperation level. The simulation results show that the cooperation level is lower if the strategies are continuous when the interaction rate is low. With higher interaction rate, the cooperation levels of continuous-strategy system and the discrete-strategy system are very close. The reason behind the phenomena is also given. Our results may shed some light on the role of continuous strategy and interaction stochasticity in the emergence and persistence of cooperation in spatial network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Luke, S., Sullivan, K., Balan, G., Panait, L.: Tunably decentralized algorithms for cooperative target observation. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Utrecht Netherlands, July 2005

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gheorghe, M., Holcomb, M., Kefalas, P.: Computational models of collective foraging. Biosystems 61(2–3), 133–141 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Camorlinga, S., Barker, K., Anderson, J.: Multiagent systems for resource allocation in peer-to-peer systems. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Information Communication and Technologies, pp. 1–6 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ciacarini, P., Omicini, A., Zambonelli, F.: Multiagent system engineering: the coordination viewpoint. In: Jennings, N.R., Lespérance, Y. (eds.) ATAL 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1757, pp. 250–259. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alexrod, R.: The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nowak, M.A.: Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314(5805), 1560–1563 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Suri, S., Watts, D.J.: Cooperation and contagion in web-based, networked public goods experiments. PLoS ONE 6, e16836 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gracia-Lázaro, C., Cuesta, J.A., Sánchez, A., Moreno, Y.: Human behavior in prisoner’s dilemma experiments suppresses network reciprocity. Sci. Rep. 2, 325 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Skyrms, B., Pemantle, R.: A dynamic model for social network formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 9340–9346 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Zimmermann, M.G., Eguíluz, V.M., Miguel, M.S.: Coevolution of dynamical states and interactions in dynamic networks. Phys. Rev. E 69, 065102(R) (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Santos, F.C., Pacheco, J.M., Lenaerts, T.: Cooperation prevails when individuals adjust their social ties. PLOS Comput. Biol. 2, 1284–1291 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tanimoto, J.: Dilemma solving by the coevolution of networks and strategy in a 262 game. Phys. Rev. E 76, 021126 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pestelacci, E., Tomassini, M., Luthi, L.: Evolution of cooperation and coordination in a dynamically networked society. J. Biol. Theory 3, 139–153 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Traulsen, A., Nowak, M.A., Pacheco, J.M.: J. Theor. Biol. 244, 349 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, X.: Interaction stochasticity supports cooperation in spatial Prisoner’s dilemma. Phys. Rev. E 78, 051120 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, Z.: Evolution of cooperation in lattice population with adaptive interaction intensity. Physica A 392, 2046–2051 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhong, W., Kokubo, S., Tanimoto, J.: How is the equilibrium of continuous strategy game different from that of discrete strategy game? Biosystems 107(2), 88–94 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tanimoto, J.: Difference in dynamic between discrete strategies and continuous strategies in a multi-player game with a linear payoff structure. BioSystem 90, 568–572 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guan, J.-Y., Wu, Z.-X., Huang, Z.-G., Xu, X.-J., Wang, Y.-H.: Europhys. Lett. 76, 1214 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao, X., Xia, H., Yu, H., Tian, L.: Agents’ cooperation based on long-term reciprocal altruism. In: Jiang, H., Ding, W., Ali, M., Wu, X. (eds.) IEA/AIE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7345, pp. 689–698. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao, X., Yu, H., Xu, Z., Tian, T., Xu, X.: The role of probability of learning and reconnecting in the evolution of cooperation. In: 2014 IEEE 12th International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, 22–24 August 2014, pp. 377–381 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao, X., Xu, Z., Yu, H., Tian, T., Xu, X.: Evolution of mixed strategies on cooperative. In: 2015 IEEE Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing, 28–30 October 2015

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is partly supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant No. 61300087.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenzhen Xu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhao, X., Xu, X., Liu, W., Huang, Y., Xu, Z. (2016). How the Strategy Continuity Influences the Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma Game with Interaction Stochasticity. In: Fujita, H., Ali, M., Selamat, A., Sasaki, J., Kurematsu, M. (eds) Trends in Applied Knowledge-Based Systems and Data Science. IEA/AIE 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9799. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42007-3_68

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42007-3_68

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42006-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42007-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics