Skip to main content

The Effect of Wearing Eyeglasses upon Postural Comfort Perception While Using Multi-tasking Electronic Devices in Sitting Position

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Ergonomics Modeling, Usability & Special Populations

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 486))

Abstract

In this paper, the authors show the results of an anecdotic experiment about the effect the use of eyeglasses has on the body posture of people in seated positions using different kinds of electronic devices: a desktop computer, a laptop, a tablet and a smartphone. The tasks were performed using a fully reconfigurable seating buck on which a standard VDT (Video Display Terminal) workplace with a chair was set. Subjects performed different tasks in order to evaluate the subjective perception of postural comfort. A Digital Human Modeling system was used to model and evaluate, from an ergonomic point of view, the ergonomic level. Software CaMAN®, was used to perform an objective evaluation of the postural comfort of subjects’ upper limbs and to compare the results obtained for the different subjects. The results show that the use of glasses has a significant effect on the body postures of the subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Galinsky, T.L., Swanson, N.G., Sauter, S.L., Hurrell, J.J., Schleifer, L.M.: A field study of supplementary rest breaks for data entry operators. Ergonomics 43, 622–638 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Naddeo, A., Memoli, S.: Postural comfort inside a car: development of an innovative model to evaluate the discomfort level. SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars Mech. Syst. 2(1), 1065–1070 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Korte, E.M., Huysmans, M.A., De Jong, A.M., Van de Ven, J.G.M., Ruijsendaal, M.: Effects of four types of non-obtrusive feedback on computer behavior, task performance and comfort. Appl. Ergon. 43, 344–353 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vink, P., Bazley, C., Kamp, I., Blok, M.: Possibilities to improve the aircraft interior comfort experience. Appl. Ergon. 43, 354–359 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Groenesteijn, L., Ellegast, R.P., Keller, K., Krause, F., Berger, H., De Looze, M.P.: Office task effects on comfort and body dynamics in five dynamic office chairs. Appl. Ergon. 43, 320–328 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ellegast, R.P., Keller, K., Groenesteijn, L., Krause, F., Berger, F., Vink, P.: Comparison of four specific dynamic office chairs with a conventional office chair: impact upon muscle activation, physical activity and posture. Appl. Ergon. 43, 296–307 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Franz, M.M., Durta, A., Zenk, R., Desmet, P.M.A.: Comfort effects of a new car headrest with neck support. Appl. Ergon. 43, 336–343 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kong, Y.U., Kim, D.M., Lee, K.S., Jung, M.C.: Comparison of comfort, discomfort, and continuum ratings of force levels and hand regions during gripping exertions. Appl. Ergon. 43, 283–289 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D’Oria, C., Naddeo, A., Cappetti, N., Pappalardo, M.: Postural analysis in HMI design: an extension of OCRA standard to evaluate discomfort lever. J. Achievements Mater. Manuf. Eng. 39, 60–70 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kamp, I.: The influence of car seat design on its character experience. Appl. Ergon. 43, 329–335 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Noro, K., Naruse, T., Lueder, R., Nao, N., Kozawa, M.: Application of Zen sitting principles to microscopic surgery seating. Appl. Ergon. 43, 308–319 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Borg, G.: Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 14, 377–381 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kee, D., Lee, I.: Relationships between subjective and objective measures in assessing postural stresses. Appl. Ergon. 43, 277–282 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Di Pardo, M., Riccio, A., Sessa, F., Naddeo, A., Talamo, L.: Methodology development for ergonomic analysis of work-cells in virtual environment. SAE Technical Papers. doi:10.4271/2008-01-1481 (2008)

  15. Zenk, R., Franz, M., Bubb, H., Vink, P.: Spine loading in automotive seating. Appl. Ergon. 43, 290–295 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vink, P., Hallbeck, S.: Editorial: comfort and discomfort studies demonstrate the need for a new model. Appl. Ergon. 43, 271–276 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moes, N.C.C.M.: Analysis of sitting discomfort, a review. In: Bust, P.D., McCabe, P.T. (eds.) Contemporary Ergonomics, pp. 200–204. Taylor & Francis, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Naddeo, A., Cappetti, N., Vallone, M., Califano, R.: New trend line of research about comfort evaluation: proposal of a framework for weighing and evaluating contributes coming from cognitive, postural and physiologic comfort perceptions. In: Vink, P. (ed.) Advances in Social and Organizational Factors. Published By “Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics” Conference 2014, ISBN 978-1-4951-2102-9 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Annarumma, M., Pappalardo, M., Naddeo, A.: Methodology development of human task simulation as PLM solution related to OCRA ergonomics analysis. In: Cascini, G. (ed) IFIP International Federation Information Processing, vol. 277, pp. 19–29. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tilley Alvin, R., Dreyfuss, H.: The Measure of Man and Woman: Human Factors in Design. Wiley & Sons Inc., New York. ISBN 978-0471099550 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cappetti, N., D’Oria, C., Naddeo, A.: New comfort evaluation criteria: application on movie-theatre design. In: IMProVe—Proceedings, pp. 0–06. Libreria Cortina, Venezia (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Apostolico, A., Cappetti, N., D’ Oria, C., Naddeo, A., Sestri, M.: Postural comfort evaluation: experimental identification of range of rest posture for human articular joints. Int. J. Interact Des. Manuf. 1–14 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fagarasanu, M., Kumar, K., Narayan, Y.: Measurement of angular wrist neutral zone and forearm muscle activity. Clin. Biomech. 19, 671–677 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Christensen, H.W., Nilsson, N.: The ability to reproduce the neutral zero position of the head. J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther. 22(1), 26–28 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Naddeo, A., Cappetti, N., Ippolito, O.: Dashboard reachability and usability tests: a cheap and effective method for drivers’ comfort rating. SAE Technical Papers. (2014). doi:10.4271/2014-01-0455

    Google Scholar 

  26. Naddeo, A., Cappetti, N., D’Oria, C.: Proposal of a new quantitative method for postural comfort evaluation. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 48, 25–35 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Laville, A.: Postural reactions related to activities on VDU. In: Grandjean, E., Vigliani, E. (eds.) Ergonomic Aspects of Visual Display Terminals, pp. 167–74. Taylor & Francis, London (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Colombini, D., Occhipinti, E., Frigo, C., Pedotti, A., Grieco, A.: Biomechanical, electromyographical and radiological study of seated postures. In: Corlett, N., Wilson, J., Manenica, I. (eds.) The Ergonomics of Working Postures: Models, Methods and Cases, pp. 331–44. Taylor & Francis, London (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nakaseko, M., Morimoto, K., Tanaka, H.: An image analyzing approach to working postures for screen and keyboard use of visual display units. In: Luczak, H., Cakir, A., Cakir, G. (eds.) Work With Display Units, vol. 92, pp. 235–239. Elsevier (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Villanueva, M.B.G., Sotoyama, M., Jonai, H., Takeuchi, Y., Saito, S.: Adjustments of posture and viewing parameters of the eye to changes in the screen height of the visual display terminal. Ergonomics 39, 933–945 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hamilton, N.: Source document position as it affects head position and neck muscle tension. Ergonomics 39, 593–610 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kumar, S., Scaife, W.G.S.: A precision task, posture and strain. J Safety Res. 11, 28–36 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Snijders, C.J., Hoek van Dijke, G.A., Roosch, E.R.: A biomechanical model for the analysis of the cervical spine in static posture. J Biomech. 24, 783–792 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Van der Heiden, G.H., Brauninger, U., Grandjean, E.: Ergonomic studies on computer aided design. In: Grandjean, E. (ed.) Ergonomics and health in modern offices, pp. 119–128. Taylor & Francis, London (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  35. De Wall, M., Van Riel, M.P.J.M., Aghina, J.C.F.M., Burdorf, A., Snijders, C.J.: Improving the sitting posture of CAD/CAM workers by increasing VDU monitor working height. Ergonomics 35, 427–436 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schuldt, K., Ekholm, J., Harms-Ringdahl, K., Nemeth, G., Arborelius, U.: Effects of changes in sitting work posture on static neck and shoulder activity. Ergonomics 29, 1525–1537 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Villanueva, M.B.G., Jonai, H., Sotoyama, M., Hisanaga, N., Takeuchi, Y., Saito, S.: Sitting posture and neck and shoulder muscle activities at different screen height settings of the visual display terminal. Ind. Health 35, 330–336 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schuldt, K., Ekholm, J., Harms-Ringdahl, K., Nemeth, G., Arborelius, U.: Effects of changes in sitting work posture on static neck and shoulder activity. Ergonomics 29, 1525–1537 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Naddeo, A., Apicella, M., Galluzzi, D.: Comfort-driven design of car interiors: a method to trace iso-comfort surfaces for positioning the dashboard commands. SAE Technical Papers No. 2015-01-1394. doi:10.4271/2015-01-1394 (2015)

  40. Villanueva, M.B.G., Jonai, H., Sotoyama, M., Hisanaga, N., Takeuchi, Y., Saito, S.: Sitting posture and neck and shoulder muscle activities at different screen height settings of the visual display terminal. Ind. Health 35, 330–336 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Trapanese, S., Naddeo, A., Cappetti, N.: A preventive evaluation of perceived postural comfort in car-cockpit design: differences between the postural approach and the accurate muscular simulation under different load conditions in the case of steering-wheel usage. SAE Technical Papers No. 2016-01-1434. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Extron Electronics. http://www.extron.com/company/article.aspx?id=environconhumanfact&tab=technology

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vito Todisco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Todisco, V., Clemente, V., Califano, R., Vallone, M. (2017). The Effect of Wearing Eyeglasses upon Postural Comfort Perception While Using Multi-tasking Electronic Devices in Sitting Position. In: Soares, M., FalcĂŁo, C., Ahram, T. (eds) Advances in Ergonomics Modeling, Usability & Special Populations. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 486. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41685-4_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41685-4_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41684-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41685-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics