Skip to main content

A Trial on Systematic Terminology Approach to Aid for Delight Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Affective and Pleasurable Design

Abstract

To design a delightful product, kansei of customers as well as technical requirements should be considered. Kansei engineering has been developed and implemented with different approaches, depending on the prospects and goals. It has been evolving and separated in important categories and this research aims at providing a new way, more systematic, to consider kansei engineering and to implement it in product development tools. In order to do so, data mining and population studies are important factors to cope with. The main prospect of this research is to provide this new kansei engineering methodology taking two inputs, a defined population and a defined product, and delivering one output, design advices that would enhance chosen emotions and the delight of customers. Such a methodology is thought to be implemented in a software.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nagamachi, M.: Kansei engineering: a new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development. Int. J. Ind. Ergono. (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schutte, S.: Engineering emotional values in product design. Linkopings Universitet Institute of Technology (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Christiane, F.: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adamic, A.L., Huberman, A.B.: Zipf’s Law and the Internet. Glottometrics 3 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, G. Wang, R., Buckley, J., Zhou, H.M.: A WordNet-based Semantic Similarity Measure Enhanced by Internet-based Knowledge. Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang, J.J., Conrath, D.W.: Semantic Similarity Based on Corpus Statistics and Lexical Taxonomy. Proceedings of International Conference Research on Computational Linguistics (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Budanitsky, A., Hirst, G.: Evaluating WordNet-based Measures of Lexical Semantic Relatedness. Association for Computational Linguistics (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hisamitsu, T., Niwa, Y., Tsujii, J.: A Method of Measuring Term Representativeness (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zipf, G.K.: Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An introduction to Human Ecology. Addison-Wesley Press (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kurumada, C., Meylan, S.C., Frank, M.C.: Zipfian Frequency Distributions Facilitate Word Segmentation in Context. Stanford University (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Newman, M.E.J.: Power Laws, Pareto Distributions and Zipf’s Law. Contemporary Physics (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ahonen, H., Heinonen, O., Klemettinen, M., Verkamo, I.: Applying Data Mining Techniques in Text Analysis. University of Helsinki (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Loftus, G.R.: Evaluating Forgetting Curves. American Psychological Association (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dempster, F.N.: The Spacing Effect. University of Nevada (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kornai, A.: Mathematical Linguistics. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ozgur, A., Cetin, B., Bingol, H.: Co-occurrence Network of Reuters News. Int. J. Modern Phys. (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fuchi, T., Takagi, S.: Japanese Morphological Analyzer using Word Co-occurrence. Association for Computational Linguistics (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lewis, W.D.: Measuring Conceptual Distance Using WordNet: The Design of a Metric for Measuring Semantic Similarity. University of Arizona (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Agarwal, A., Bhattacharyya, P.: Augmenting WordNet with Polarity Information on Adjectives. Department of Computer Science and Engineering I.I.T, Bombay (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is based on results obtained from SIP (Cross-ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program) DDP (Delight Design Platform) project commissioned by NEDO (New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to François Charles Rovere .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rovere, F.C., Murakami, T., Yanagisawa, H. (2017). A Trial on Systematic Terminology Approach to Aid for Delight Design. In: Chung, W., Shin, C. (eds) Advances in Affective and Pleasurable Design . Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 483. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41661-8_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41661-8_48

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41660-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41661-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics