Skip to main content

The WoMan Formalism for Expressing Process Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Data Mining. Applications and Theoretical Aspects (ICDM 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9728))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Workflow management is fundamental to efficiently, effectively and economically carry out complex processes. In turn, the formalism used for representing workflow models is crucial for effectiveness. The formalism introduced by the WoMan framework for workflow management, based on First-Order Logic, is more expressive than standard formalisms adopted in the literature, and ensures strict adherence to the observed practices. This paper discusses in some details such a formalism, highlighting its most outstanding strengths and comparing it to the current standard formalism (Petri nets), also providing techniques for the translation of workflow models among the two formalisms. The comparison between the two models shows that WoMan is more powerful than standard Petri Nets, and that it can handle naturally and straightforwardly cases that would require complex patterns in Petri Nets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that this is a different meaning than in Petri Nets. In the following, we will distinguish the latter by writing Petri Net transitions.

References

  1. Agrawal, R., Gunopulos, D., Leymann, F.: Mining process models from workflow logs. In: Schek, H.-J., Saltor, F., Ramos, I., Alonso, G. (eds.) EDBT 1998. LNCS, vol. 1377, pp. 467–483. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Cook, J.E., Wolf, A.L.: Discovering models of software processes from event-based data. Technical Report CU-CS-819-96, Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cook, J.E., Wolf, A.L.: Event-based detection of concurrency. Technical report CU-CS-860-98, Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. de Medeiros, A.K.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weijters, A.J.M.M.T.: Workflow mining: current status and future directions. In: Meersman, R., Schmidt, D.C. (eds.) CoopIS 2003, DOA 2003, and ODBASE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2888, pp. 389–406. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. de Medeiros, A.K.A., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weijters, A.: Process mining: extending the \(\alpha \)-algorithm to mine short loops. In: WP 113, BETA Working Paper Series. Eindhoven University of Technology (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. de Medeiros, A.K.A., Weijters, A.J.M.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Genetic process mining: an experimental evaluation. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 14, 245–304 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferilli, S.: WoMan: logic-based workflow learning and management. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 44, 744–756 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferilli, S., Esposito, F.: A logic framework for incremental learning of process models. Fundamenta Informaticae 128(4), 413–443 (2013). IOS Press

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Herbst, J.: Dealing with concurrency in workflow induction. In: Proceedings of European Concurrent Engineering Conference, pp. 175–182. SCS Europe (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Herbst, J., Karagiannis, D.: Integrating machine learning and workflow management to support acquisition and adaptation of workflow models. In: Proceedings of 9th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pp. 745–752. IEEE (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Herbst, J., Karagiannis, D.: An inductive approach to the acquisition and adaptation of workflow models. In Proceedings of IJCAI 1999 Workshop on Intelligent Workflow and Process Management: The New Frontier for AI in Business, pp. 52–57 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Herbst, J.: A machine learning approach to workflow management. In: Lopez de Mantaras, R., Plaza, E. (eds.) ECML 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1810, pp. 183–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. van der Aalst, W., et al.: Process mining manifesto. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2011, Part I. LNBIP, vol. 99, pp. 169–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Maggi, F.M., Bose, R.P.J.C., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Efficient discovery of understandable declarative process models from event logs. In: Ralyté, J., Franch, X., Brinkkemper, S., Wrycza, S. (eds.) CAiSE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7328, pp. 270–285. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Pesic, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: A declarative approach for flexible business processes management. In: Eder, J., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2006. LNCS, vol. 4103, pp. 169–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Rozinat, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Decision mining in business processes. In: WP 164, BETA Working Paper Series. Eindhoven University of Technology (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: The application of petri nets to workflow management. J. Circ. Syst. Comput. 8, 21–66 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process mining: overview and opportunities. ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst. 3, 7.1–7.17 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dustdar, S.: Process mining put into context. IEEE Internet Comput. 16, 82–86 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weijters, T., Maruster, L.: Workflow mining: discovering process models from event logs. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 16, 1128–1142 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Weijters, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Rediscovering workflow models from event-based data. In: Proceedings of 11th Dutch-Belgian Conference of Machine Learning (Benelearn 2001), pp. 93–100 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wen, L., Wang, J., Sun, J.: Detecting implicit dependencies between tasks from event logs. In: Zhou, X., Li, J., Shen, H.T., Kitsuregawa, M., Zhang, Y. (eds.) APWeb 2006. LNCS, vol. 3841, pp. 591–603. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially funded by the Italian PON 2007–2013 project PON02_00563_3489339 ‘Puglia@Service’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Ferilli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ferilli, S. (2016). The WoMan Formalism for Expressing Process Models. In: Perner, P. (eds) Advances in Data Mining. Applications and Theoretical Aspects. ICDM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9728. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41561-1_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41561-1_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41560-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41561-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics