Skip to main content

Performance of Breast Cancer Screening Depends on Mammographic Compression

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Breast Imaging (IWDM 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 9699))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

During mammographic acquisition, the breast is compressed between the breast support plate and the compression paddle to improve image quality and reduce dose, among other reasons. The applied force, which is measured by the imaging device, varies substantially, due to local guidelines, positioning, and breast size. Force measurements may not be very relevant though, because the amount of compression will be related to pressure rather than force. With modern image analysis techniques, the contact surface of the breast under compression can be determined and pressure can be computed retrospectively. In this study, we investigate if there is a relation between pressure applied to the breast during compression and screening performance.

In a series of 113,464 screening exams from the Dutch breast cancer screening program we computed the compression pressure applied in the MLO projections of the right and left breasts. The exams were binned into five groups of increasing applied pressure, in such a way that each group contains 20 % of the exams. Thresholds were 7.68, 9.18, 10.71 and 12.81 kPa. Screening performance measures were determined for each group. Differences across the groups were investigated with a Pearson’s Chi Square test.

It was found that PPV and the cancer detection rate vary significantly within the five groups (p = 0.001 and p = 0.011 respectively). The PPV was 25.4, 31.2, 32.7, 25.8 and 22.0 for the five groups with increasing pressure. The recall rate, false positive rate and specificity were not statistically significant from the expectation (p-values: 0.858, 0.088 and 0.094 respectively). Even though differences are not significant, there is a trend that the groups with a moderate pressure have a better performance compared to the first and last category.

The results suggest that high pressure reduces detectability of breast cancer. The best screening results were found in the groups with a moderate pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chen, B., Wang, Y., Sun, X., Guo, W., Zhao, M., Cui, G., Hu, L., Li, P., Ren, Y., Feng, J., Yu, J.: Analysis of patient dose in full field digital mammography. Eur. J. Radiol. 81(5), 868–872 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Heine, J.J., Cao, K., Thomas, J.A.: Effective radiation attenuation calibration for breast density: compression thickness influences and correction. Biomed. Eng. Online 9, 73 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kopans, D.B.: Breast Imaging, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Saunders Jr., R.S., Samei, E.: The effect of breast compression on mass conspicuity in digital mammography. Med. Phys. 35(10), 4464–4473 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dullum, J.R., Lewis, E.C., Mayer, J.A.: Rates and correlates of discomfort associated with mammography. Radiology 214(2), 547–552 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Keefe, F.J., Hauck, E.R., Egert, J., Rimer, B., Kornguth, P.: Mammography pain and discomfort: a cognitive-behavioral perspective. Pain 56(3), 247–260 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Perry, N., Broeders, M., de Wolf, C., Törnberg, S., Holland, R., Karsa, L.V.: European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screeningand Diagnosis, 4 edn. (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. de Groot, J.E., Broeders, M.J.M., Branderhorst, W., den Heeten, G.J., Grimbergen, C.A.: A novel approach to mammographic breast compression: Improved standardization and reduced discomfort by controlling pressure instead of force. Med. Phys. 40(8), 081901 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Branderhorst, W., de Groot, J.E., Highnam, R., Chan, A., Böhm-Vélez, M., Broeders, M.J.M., den Heeten, G.J., Grimbergen, C.A.: Mammographic compression-a need for mechanical standardization. Eur. J. Radiol. 84(4), 596–602 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mercer, C.E., Hogg, P., Lawson, R., Diffey, J., Denton, E.R.E.: Practitioner compression force variability in mammography: a preliminary study. Br. J. Radiol. 86(1022), 20110596 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. de Groot, J.E., Branderhorst, W., Grimbergen, C.A., den Heeten, G.J., Broeders, M.J.M.: Towards personalized compression in mammography: a comparison study between pressure- and force-standardization. Eur. J. Radiol. 84(3), 384–391 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7 under grant agreement no 306088.

Special thanks to the Foundation of Population Screening Mid-West for providing the images and Ralph Highnam at Volpara for providing access to the Volpara Software.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katharina Holland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Holland, K., Sechopoulos, I., den Heeten, G., Mann, R.M., Karssemeijer, N. (2016). Performance of Breast Cancer Screening Depends on Mammographic Compression. In: Tingberg, A., Lång, K., Timberg, P. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9699. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41545-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41546-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics