Skip to main content

Sovereign and Bank CDS Spreads During the European Debt Crisis: Laying the Foundation for SMEs’ Financial Distress

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Access to Bank Credit and SME Financing

Abstract

Using a sample of 14,910 daily credit default swap (CDS) observations related to 24 banks chartered in seven countries in the Euro area, we assess the existence of a causal relation between sovereign and bank credit risk during 2010–2014. Our results show that CDS spreads of the observed banks are highly influenced by the price dynamics of sovereign CDSs.

Our findings support the widespread view in the literature that a worsening market perception of sovereign credit risk has a significant impact on the behaviour of banks. In response to sovereign shocks, banks transfer the stress to borrowers, thus reducing lending and/or increasing the cost of borrowing for enterprises.

JEL Classification: G01, G12, G13, G15, G20, D8

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that the literature on CDSs and its determinants has recently seen growing attention by researchers given the pivotal role played by bank CDSs during the 2007 global financial crisis (see Angeloni and Wolff 2012; Ejsing and Lemke 2011; Demirguc-Kunt and Huizinga 2011; Acharya et al. 2014; Alter and Beyer 2014; Bosma et al. 2012; Gross and Kok 2013). Of particular interest in the field is the contribution by Annaert et al. (2013). The authors explain changes in banks’ CDS spreads through a set of explanatory credit risk variables. The study, inspired by Merton’s theoretical credit risk model (Merton 1974), analyzes 31 European banks. The model includes variables linked to CDS liquidity and variables related to the market and the business cycle. The results show how, during the financial crisis, an increase in credit risk significantly raises the CDS spread. An exhaustive and more complete survey of the literature on CDS is in Augustin et al. (2014).

  2. 2.

    Indeed, the propagation mechanism of shocks that may affect the decline in bank lending can have several explanations in the literature (Popov and Van-Horen 2015). Some argue that agency costs (Ueda 2012; Dedola et al. 2013) can be viewed as an explanation for the propagation of shocks that reduce the net worth of financial intermediaries; others include capital requirements (Kollmann et al. 2011; Mendoza and Quadrini 2010) and the monopolistic competition that generates countercyclical price-cost margins (Olivero 2010). Alternatively, information asymmetries between banks and investors can be exacerbated by adverse shocks to banks’ net worth, reducing lending to the private real sector.

  3. 3.

    For the sake of clarity, the stationarity of a series might depend on the choice of the length of the period of observation. The majority of papers that found evidence of non-stationarity usually included the period of high uncertainty and stress as the years 2006–2007, which were characterized by a notable increase in CDS premiums and an important destabilization of the financial system. Additionally, the literature often provides support for the hypothesis of non-stationarity of banks’ CDSs. Therefore, it is pivotal to test for the possible existence of unit roots in our variables. In fact, if banks’ CDSs and sovereign CDSs were integrated in the same order, the analysis of causality could be based on a study of the co-integration of the two series.

  4. 4.

    Identified as in Avino and Cotter (2014).

  5. 5.

    Regarding banks’ CDSs, indeed, the hypothesis of stationarity is weakly rejected at a 5.7% probability in the restricted version of the sample.

  6. 6.

    Indeed, it is not surprising that daily observations can be correlated with their first lag.

References

  • Acharya, V. V., Drechsler, I., & Schnabl, P. (2014). A pyrrhic victory? Bank bailouts and sovereign credit risk. The Journal of Finance, 69, 2689–2739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adelino, M., & Ferreira, M. (2016). Bank ratings and lending supply: Evidence from sovereign downgrades. The Review of Financial Studies, 29(7), 1709–1746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, A., & Beyer, A. (2014). The dynamics of spillover effects during the European sovereign debt turmoil. Journal of Banking & Finance, 42, 134–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alter, A., & Schüler, Y. (2012). Credit spread interdependencies of European states and banks during the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(12), 3444–3468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelini, P., Grande, G., & Panetta, F. (2014). The negative feedback loop between banks and sovereigns (Occasional papers no. 213/January). Bank of Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angeloni, C., & Wolff, G. (2012). Are banks affected by their holdings of government debt? (Bruegel working paper no. 07).

    Google Scholar 

  • Annaert, J., De Ceuster, M., Van Roy, P., & Vespro, C. (2013). What determines Euro area bank CDS spreads. Journal of International Money and Finance, 32, 444–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augustin, P., Subrahmanyam, M. G., Tang, D. Y., & Wang, S. Q. (2014). Credit default swaps: A survey. Foundations and Trends in Finance, 9(1–2), 1–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avino, D., & Cotter, J. (2014). Sovereign and bank CDS spreads: Two sides of the same coin? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 32, 72–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballester, L., Casu, B., & González-Urteaga, A. (2016). Bank fragility and contagion: Evidence from the bank CDS market. Journal of Empirical Finance, 38, 394–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A., Hung, C.H.D., & Lo, K. L. (2016). An anatomy of credit risk transfer between sovereign and financials in the Eurozone crisis. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 41, 102–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedendo, M., & Colla, P. (2015). Sovereign and corporate credit risk: Evidence from the Eurozone. Journal of Corporate Finance, 33, 34–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bofondi, M., Carpinelli, L., & Sette, E. (2013). Credit supply during a sovereign crisis (Working papers no. 909/April). Bank of Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosma, J., Koetter, M., & Wedow, M. (2012). Credit risk connectivity in the financial industry and stabilization effects of government bailouts (Discussion paper no. 16). Deutsche Bundesbank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiaramonte, L., & Casu, B. (2013). The determinants of bank CDS spreads: evidence from the financial crisis. The European Journal of Finance, 19(9), 861–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa, R., Sapriza, H., & Zlate, A. (2012). Liquidity shocks, dollar funding costs, and the bank lending channel during the European sovereign crisis (Discussion paper no. 1059). Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System International Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsetti, G., Kuester, K., Meier, A., & Müller, G. J. (2014). Sovereign risk and belief-driven fluctuations in the euro area. Journal of Monetary Economics, 61, 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Fonseca, J., & Gottschalk, K. (2014). Cross-hedging strategies between CDS spreads and option volatility during crises. Journal of International Money and Finance, 49, 386–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bruyckere, V., Gerhardt, M., Schepens, G., & Vander Vennet, R. (2013). Bank/sovereign risk spillovers in the European debt crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37, 4793–4809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Marco, F. (2016). Bank lending and the European sovereign debt crisis. Unpublished manuscript, Bocconi University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dedola, L., Karadi, P., & Lombardo, G. (2013). Global implications of national unconventional policies. Journal of Monetary Economics, 60, 66–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Huizinga, H. (2011). Do we need big banks? Evidence on performance, strategy and market discipline (World Bank Policy research working paper no. 5576).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ejsing, J., & Lemke, W. (2011). The Janus-headed salvation: Sovereign and bank credit risk premia during 2008–2009. Economics Letters, 110, 28–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, A., & Scheicher, M. (2016). An analysis of euro area sovereign CDS and their relation with government bonds. Journal of Banking and Finance, 62, 126–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galil, K., Shapir, O. M., Amiram, D., & Ben-Zion, U. (2014). The determinants of CDS spreads. Journal of Banking & Finance, 41, 271–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, I., Li, Y., & Yang, L. (2014). Speculation and hedging in segmented markets. Review of Financial Studies, 27(3), 881–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M., & Kok, C. (2013). A mixed-cross-section GVAR for countries and banks. mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivashina, V., Scharfstein, D., & Stein, J. (2012). Dollar funding and the lending behaviour of global banks (NBER working paper no. 18528).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanagaretnama, K., Zhang, G., & Zhang, S. B. (2016). CDS pricing and accounting disclosures: Evidence from U.S. bank holding corporations around the recent financial crisis. Journal of Financial Stability, 22, 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmann, R., Enders, Z., & Muller, G. (2011). Global banking and international business cycles. European Economic Review, 55, 407–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, E., & Quadrini, V. (2010). Financial globalization, financial crises, and contagion. Journal of Monetary Economics, 57, 24–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. C. (1974). On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates. Journal of Finance, 29(2), 449–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2012). OECD sovereign borrowing outlook 2012. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olivero, M. (2010). Market power in banking, countercyclical margins, and the international transmission of business cycles. Journal of International Economics, 80, 292–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popov, A., & Udell, G. F. (2012). Cross-border banking, credit access, and the financial crisis. Journal of International Economics, 87, 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popov, A., & Van Horen, N. (2015). Exporting sovereign stress: Evidence from syndicated bank lending during the euro area sovereign debt crisis. Review of Finance, 19, 1825–1866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ueda, K. (2012). Banking globalization and international business cycles. Journal of International Economics, 86, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Völz, M., & Wedow, M. (2009, June). Does banks’ size distort market prices? Evidence of too-big-to-fail in the CDS market (Deutsche Bundesbank discussion paper). Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Danilo V. Mascia, Paolo Mattana and Stefania P.S. Rossi gratefully acknowledge research grants from the Autonomous Region of Sardinia, Legge Regionale 2007, N. 7 [Grant Number CRP-59890, year 2012].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danilo V. Mascia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. A.6.1
figure 4

Austrian banks’ CDSs

Fig. A.6.2
figure 5

French banks’ CDSs

Fig. A.6.3
figure 6

German banks’ CDSs

Fig. A.6.4
figure 7

Greek banks’ CDSs

Fig. A.6.5
figure 8

Italian banks’ CDSs

Fig. A.6.6
figure 9

Portuguese banks’ CDSs

Fig. A.6.7
figure 10

Spanish banks’ CDSs

Fig. A.6.8
figure 11

Sovereign CDS (Austria)

Fig. A.6.9
figure 12

Sovereign CDS (France)

Fig. A.6.10
figure 13

Sovereign CDS (Germany)

Fig. A.6.11
figure 14

Sovereign CDS (Greece)

Fig. A.6.12
figure 15

Sovereign CDS (Italy)

Fig. A.6.13
figure 16

Sovereign CDS (Portugal)

Fig. A.6.14
figure 17

Sovereign CDS (Spain)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mascia, D.V., Mattana, P., Rossi, S.P., D’Aietti, R. (2017). Sovereign and Bank CDS Spreads During the European Debt Crisis: Laying the Foundation for SMEs’ Financial Distress. In: Rossi, S. (eds) Access to Bank Credit and SME Financing. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41363-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41363-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41362-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41363-1

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics