Skip to main content

Assessment and Diagnosis of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Abstract

Various iterations of diagnostic criteria for MS have been proposed over the years, but the underlying principle of diagnosing relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) has remained the same, requiring evidence of disease dissemination at various time points and in various parts of the central nervous system (dissemination in time and space). Criteria for dissemination can be fulfilled either by clinical relapses or, more recently, by characteristic MRI abnormalities, although in all cases patients must have experienced at least one clinical relapse. Although MRI has largely replaced the use of CSF and evoked potential testing in the explicit diagnostic criteria, paraclinical testing may be useful for ruling out alternative disease etiology, and, indeed, diagnostic criteria require that no better explanation for the neurologic symptoms be available. The extent of additional testing needed to ensure that no better explanation is available is highly case dependent. Depending on the nature of the presenting symptoms and imaging findings the differential diagnosis may include infectious, vascular, neoplastic, genetic, and toxic/metabolic diseases as well as other non-MS idiopathic demyelinating disease such as neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). Once a diagnosis is established, various assessment scales including the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) can be used to monitor disability levels for both clinical and research purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, McDonald WI, Davis FA, Ebers GC, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol. 1983;13:227–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011;69:292–302.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Barkhof F, Filippi M, Miller DH, Scheltens P, Campi A, Polman CH, et al. Comparison of MRI criteria at first presentation to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Brain. 1997;120(Pt 11):2059–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tintore M, Rovira A, Martinez MJ, Rio J, Díaz-Villoslada P, Brieva L, et al. Isolated demyelinating syndromes: comparison of different MR imaging criteria to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:702–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2001;50:121–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G, Filippi M, Hartung HP, Kappos L, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald criteria”. Ann Neurol. 2005;58:840–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Swanton JK, Rovira A, Tintore M, Altmann DR, Barkhof F, Filippi M, et al. MRI criteria for multiple sclerosis in patients presenting with clinically isolated syndromes: a multicentre retrospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:677–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Comi G, Filippi M, Barkhof F, Durelli L, Edan G, Fernández O, et al. Effect of early interferon treatment on conversion to definite multiple sclerosis: a randomised study. Lancet. 2001;357:1576–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Comi G, Martinelli V, Rodegher M, Moiola L, Bajenaru O, Carra A, et al. Effect of glatiramer acetate on conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (PreCISe study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374:1503–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Comi G, Martinelli V, Rodegher M, Moiola L, Leocani L, Bajenaru O, et al. Effects of early treatment with glatiramer acetate in patients with clinically isolated syndrome. Mult Scler. 2013;19:1074–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Galetta SL. The controlled high risk avonex multiple sclerosis trial (CHAMPS study). J Neuroophthalmol. 2001;21:292–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kappos L, Polman CH, Freedman MS, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, et al. Treatment with interferon beta-1b delays conversion to clinically definite and McDonald MS in patients with clinically isolated syndromes. Neurology. 2006;67:1242–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miller AE, Wolinsky JS, Kappos L, Comi G, Freedman MS, Olsson TP, et al. Oral teriflunomide for patients with a first clinical episode suggestive of multiple sclerosis (TOPIC): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:977–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moore F, Okuda DT. Incidental MRI anomalies suggestive of multiple sclerosis: the radiologically isolated syndrome. Neurology. 2009;73:1714.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Okuda DT, Siva A, Kantarci O, Inglese M, Katz I, Tutuncu M, et al. Radiologically isolated syndrome: 5-year risk for an initial clinical event. PLoS One. 2014;9:e90509.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Awad A, Hemmer B, Hartung HP, Kieseier B, Bennett JL, Stuve O. Analyses of cerebrospinal fluid in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2010;219:1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Link H, Huang YM. Oligoclonal bands in multiple sclerosis cerebrospinal fluid: an update on methodology and clinical usefulness. J Neuroimmunol. 2006;180:17–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruet A, Deloire MS, Ouallet JC, Molinier S, Brochet B. Predictive factors for multiple sclerosis in patients with clinically isolated spinal cord syndrome. Mult Scler. 2011;17:312–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tintore M, Rovira A, Rio J, Tur C, Pelayo R, Nos C, et al. Do oligoclonal bands add information to MRI in first attacks of multiple sclerosis? Neurology. 2008;70(13 Pt 2):1079–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Beer S, Rosler KM, Hess CW. Diagnostic value of paraclinical tests in multiple sclerosis: relative sensitivities and specificities for reclassification according to the poser committee criteria. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995;59:152–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Fuhr P, Borggrefe-Chappuis A, Schindler C, Kappos L. Visual and motor evoked potentials in the course of multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2001;124(Pt 11):2162–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Weinstock-Guttman B, Baier M, Stockton R, Weinstock A, Justinger T, Munschauer F, et al. Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials as a measure of visual pathway pathology in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2003;9:529–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983;33:1444–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Willoughby EW, Paty DW. Scales for rating impairment in multiple sclerosis: a critique. Neurology. 1988;38:1793–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Meyer-Moock S, Feng YS, Maeurer M, Dippel FW, Kohlmann T. Systematic literature review and validity evaluation of the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and the multiple sclerosis functional composite (MSFC) in patients with multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol. 2014;14:58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Cutter GR, Baier ML, Rudick RA, Cookfair DL, Fischer JS, Petkau J, et al. Development of a multiple sclerosis functional composite as a clinical trial outcome measure. Brain. 1999;122(Pt 5):871–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lennon VA, Wingerchuk DM, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Fujihara K, et al. A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2004;364:2106–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Papadopoulos MC, Verkman AS. Aquaporin 4 and neuromyelitis optica. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:535–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Jarius S, Wildemann B. Aquaporin-4 antibodies (NMO-IgG) as a serological marker of neuromyelitis optica: a critical review of the literature. Brain Pathol. 2013;23:661–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wingerchuk DM, Banwell B, Bennett JL, Cabre P, Carroll W, Chitnis T, et al. International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology. 2015;85:177–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sato DK, Callegaro D, Lana-Peixoto MA, Waters PJ, de Haidar Jorge FM, Takahashi T, et al. Distinction between MOG antibody-positive and AQP4 antibody-positive NMO spectrum disorders. Neurology. 2014;82:474–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Weinshenker BG. Revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica. Neurology. 2006;66:1485–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kleiter I, Hellwig K, Berthele A, Kümpfel T, Linker RA, Hartung HP, et al. Failure of natalizumab to prevent relapses in neuromyelitis optica. Arch Neurol. 2012;69:239–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Palace J, Leite MI, Nairne A, Vincent A. Interferon beta treatment in neuromyelitis optica: increase in relapses and aquaporin 4 antibody titers. Arch Neurol. 2010;67:1016–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Krupp LB, Tardieu M, Amato MP, Banwell B, Chitnis T, Dale RC, et al. International pediatric multiple sclerosis study group criteria for pediatric multiple sclerosis and immune-mediated central nervous system demyelinating disorders: revisions to the 2007 definitions. Mult Scler. 2013;19:1261–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Koelman DL, Mateen FJ. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: current controversies in diagnosis and outcome. J Neurol. 2015;262:2013–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron Miller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Straus-Farber, R., Miller, A. (2017). Assessment and Diagnosis of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. In: Miller, A. (eds) Handbook of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. Adis, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40628-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40628-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Adis, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40626-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40628-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics