Skip to main content

The ‘Urban’ and Education in India: Section Editor’s Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Second International Handbook of Urban Education

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

Abstract

The introductory chapter to this section presents a perspective and an overview of the many meanings of the urban and education in India. Drawing from the contributions of individual authors who discuss five Indian cities and an urban fringe as well as relevant research, the chapter attempts to provide a glimpse of the complexity of the urban-education interface in this country over time. It sets the context for the section by tracing the pathway of urbanisation and education from the colonial urban (post 1850), through the early post independence decades of welfare developmentalism (post 1947), economic reforms and liberalisation (post 1990s) and the present phase of neoliberal globalisation. The city has been viewed as the site of opportunity and has been the destination for rural migrants especially belonging to disadvantaged communities looking towards economic betterment and a life of dignity. Education has been viewed as a key channel for social mobility. However, the process of urbanisation especially since the early 1980s has seen the city and its schools become increasingly spatially and socially segregated, most starkly visible in the mega cities/metropolis. As exclusive enclaves for the privileged emerge, the poor are increasingly forced to relocate to the periphery of the city to live in slums and shanties where there is little access to basic facilities including education of reasonable quality provided by the state. They are increasingly left to the mercies of the market. This chapter, as well as the contribution of authors, point out that schools and colleges are becoming the main sites of competition for positional advantage and exclusion. Private schooling and ‘coaching’ (private tutorials) are now big business in the city and the education economy is today transforming urban spaces. This is to the detriment of the poor and disadvantaged groups who are pushed to the margins of the city and its education. The chapter raises the larger issue of the importance of building a social imaginary of an inclusive Urban Society. Education is implicated in such an imaginary and h hence must be urgently reflected upon.

I thank Professor George W. Noblit and Professor William T. Pink for inviting me to edit this section. I am grateful to my authors: Divya Vaid, Manabi Majumdar, Nandini Manjrekar, Purendra Prasad, Radhika Menon and Srinivasa Rao. It has been a pleasure and a learning experience working with them to put this section together. I thank the Zakir Husain Centre for Educational Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, for giving us the space to hold a workshop to discuss our initial drafts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 469.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to the Census of India 2011<?oxy_insert_start?>,<?oxy_insert_end?> an urban area includes (a) statutory towns (all places with a municipality/corporation) (b) Census towns include ‘all other places with a minimum population of 5,000 persons with at least 75 % of the male main working population engaged in non<?oxy_insert_start?>-<?oxy_insert_end?>agricultural pursuits; and a density of population of at least 400 persons per sq. Km’. (http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-prov-results/paper2/data_files/India2/1.%20Data%20Highlight.pdf. accessed, January 2015).

  2. 2.

    Under Article 17 of the Constitution of Independent India adopted in 1948, untouchability in any form has been abolished.

  3. 3.

    ‘Slum’ is a term that is often has a derogatory connotation. I use it here as it is the official term for temporary shanties.

  4. 4.

    These include different forms of informal and temporary work contracts that are characteristic of the growing ‘flexibilisation of labour’ (See Srivastava 2012). Srivastava observes that ‘....casual/contract work does encompass the poorest conditions of work’ (2012: 64).

  5. 5.

    Scheduled castes (SC) and Scheduled tribes (ST) are the official terms for groups that suffered historical injustices and continue to be disadvantaged in contemporary Indian society. They are entitled to special provisions for their protection and development as well as political representation by the Constitution of India. Scheduled Castes who prefer to name themselves ‘Dalit’, suffered from social discrimination because of their position as ‘untouchables’ in the caste system. Scheduled Tribes or ‘Adivasis’ are disadvantaged because of their experience of relative isolation, neglect and cultural marginalisation. Vast sections of SC and ST are economically amongst the most vulnerable social groups in India.

  6. 6.

    http://hiranandani.com/Hiranandani_Gardens.aspx; http://www.jaypeesports.com/jaypeesportscity.shtml<?oxy_delete content="."?>; http://www.lavasa.com/live/the-lavasa-life.aspx (Accessed, August 2015).

  7. 7.

    Under the Right to Education Act (2009)<?oxy_insert_start?>,<?oxy_insert_end?> 25 % of children who are admitted to class 1/entry level in private schools must belong to ‘economically weaker sections’ (EWS). The children thus admitted are to be given education free of cost (freeships) which will be reimbursed by the government (See RtE 2009). The 25 % ‘quota’ in private schools has been controversial and subject to considerable debate and legal contestation by private schools. However<?oxy_insert_start?>,<?oxy_insert_end?> it has been reaffirmed by the Supreme Court of India. Efforts are on to ensure its implementation.

References

  • Arronowitz, S., & Giroux, H. A. (1986). Education under siege: The conservative, liberal and radical debate over schooling. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chairez-Garza, J. F. (2014). Touching space: Ambedkar on the spatial features of untouchability. Contemporary South Asia, 22(1), 37–50. doi:10.1080/09584935.2013.870978. Accessed Nov 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, D. (2013). Gentrification in the mill land areas of Mumbai City: A case study. http://www.rc21.org/conferences/berlin2013/RC21-Berlin-Papers-3/13-Chatterjee-Dwiparna.pdf. Accessed Dec 2016.

  • Chaudhury, L. (2007). An economic history of education in Colonial India http://economics.ucr.edu/seminars_colloquia/2007/political_economy_development/LatikaChaudhary5-6-07.pdf. Accessed Apr 2015.

  • Ciotti, M. (2010). Retro – modern India. Forging the low-caste self. New Delhi: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, K., Lalitha, K., & Vijayabaskar, M. (Eds.) (2013). Opening up or ushering in? Citizen participation as mandate and practice in urban governance. In Participolis: Consent and contention in neoliberal urban India (pp. 2–33). New Delhi: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Monte, D. (1998). Redevelopment of Mumbai’s cotton textile mill land -O pportunity lost. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(6), 283–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, D. (2015). The importance of being ‘Rurban’. Tracking changes in a traditional setting. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(24), 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. http://davidharvey.org/media/righttothe.city.pdf. Accessed Mar 2015.

  • Jeffrey, C., & Harriss, J. (2014). Keywords for modern India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juneja, N. (2001). Primary education for all in the city of Mumbai, India: the challenge set by local actors http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001248/124839e.pdf. Accessed July 2015.

  • Juneja, N. (2005). Exclusive schools in Delhi: Their land and the law. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(33), 3685–3690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juneja, N. (2015) Education in urban areas (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamat, A. R. (1985). Education and social change in India. Bombay: Somaiya Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamat, S. (2011). Neoliberalism, urbanism and the education economy: Producing Hyderabad as a ‘global city’. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(2), 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (2003). The urban revolution (Trans. Robert Bononno). London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, P. (2010). Education and the right to the city: The intersection of urban policy, education and poverty. In M. W. Apple, S. J. Ball, & L. A. Gandin (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 241–252). London: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, P. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism race and the right to the city. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar, M. (2014). The shadow school system and new class divisions in India, Working papers of the Max Weber Foundation’s Transnational Research Group India http://www.perspectivia.net/publikationen/trg-working-papers/majumdar_shadow. Accessed Jun 2015.

  • Nambissan, G. B., & Batra, P. (1989). Equity and excellence: Issues in Indian education. Social Scientist, 17, 56–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nambissan, G. B. (2010). The Indian middle classes and educational advantage: Family strategies and practices. In M. W. Apple, S. J. Ball, & L. A. Gandin (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 285–295). London: Routledge & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nambissan, G. B. (2014). Poverty, markets and elementary education in India, Working papers of the Max Weber Foundation’s Transnational Research Group India “Poverty Reduction and Policy for the Poor between the State and Private Actors: Education Policy in India since the Nineteenth Century”. http://www.perspectivia.net/publikationen/trg-working-papers/nambissan_markets.

  • NCERT (National Council of Educational Research and Training). (1971). Education and national development. Report of the education commission (1964–66). New Delhi: NCERT.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCERT. (1982). Fourth all India education survey. New Delhi: National Council for Educational Research and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • RtE (Right to Education). (2009). The right of children to free and compulsory education Act 2009. http://www.mhrd.gov.in/rte. Accessed July 2010.

  • Seal, A. (1968). The emergence of Indian nationalism: Competition and collaboration in the later nineteenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scrase, T. J., Rutten, M., Ganguly-Scrace, A. R., & Brown, T. (2015). Beyond the metropolis – Regional globalisation and town development in India: An introduction. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 38(2), 216–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2015.1031459 (Accessed, April 2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (2009) The city and spatial justice. http://www.jssj.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/JSSJ1-1en4.pdf pp 1–5. Accessed Nov 2015.

  • Srivastava, R. (2012). Changing employment conditions of the Indian workforce and implications for decent work. https://escarpmentpress.org/globallabour/article/download/1113/1169. Accessed Feb 2016.

  • UN (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division). (2014). World urbanization prospects : The 2014 revision, highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352) http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/highlights/wup2014-highlights.pdf.

  • Verma, G. D. (2004). Indore Zila Sarkar’s interventions in school education: Betraying our children in the name of decentralization and universalization of education. MPISG, New Delhi. Architexturez Imprints. http://architexturez.net/doc/az-cf-21855

  • Waldrop, A. (2004). The meaning of the old school-tie: Private schools, admission procedures and class segmentation in New Delhi. In A. Vaugier-Chatterjee (Ed.), Education and democracy in India (pp. 203–228). New Delhi: Manohar and Centre De Sciences Humaines.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geetha B. Nambissan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nambissan, G.B. (2017). The ‘Urban’ and Education in India: Section Editor’s Introduction. In: Pink, W., Noblit, G. (eds) Second International Handbook of Urban Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40317-5_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40317-5_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40315-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40317-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics