Skip to main content

Quality Improvement: Preventing Readmission After Ileostomy Formation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Difficult Decisions in Colorectal Surgery

Abstract

Readmission after surgery is a problem that is increasingly recognized by surgeons, patients, insurers, and hospitals. It exposes patients to additional risk and increases expense in a variety of predictable ways. Readmission can occur for a number of reasons but in colorectal surgery it falls into a few broad categories: complications related to the operative procedure, functional complications as a result of the procedure, and medical complications unrelated to the procedure but related to hospitalization, anesthesia, or patient comorbidities. Relatively common reasons for readmission following discharge after elective colorectal operation include surgical site infection (wound infection and anastomotic leak or intra-abdominal abscess), high ileostomy output and dehydration, and symptomatic venous thrombosis events. In recent years, a focus on quality metrics has highlighted deficiencies that are possible to target by planned interventions resulting in improvement in patient clinical outcomes as well as health system resource allocation. Surgical site infection and venous thrombosis prevention have been the subject of numerous studies. There are evidence-based guidelines and recommendations focused on creating pathways and specific interventions for these issues already and a chapter on evidence and recommendations could easily be written on each of these problems. Acceptable interventions for ileostomy dehydration are not as well studied and therefore consensus is more difficult.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tyler JA, Fox JP, Dharmarajan S, et al. Acute health care resource utilization for ileostomy patients is higher than expected. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(12):1412–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Åkesson O, Syk I, Lindmark G, Buchwald P. Morbidity related to defunctioning loop ileostomy in low anterior resection. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27(12):1619–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hayden DM, Pinzon MC, Francescatti AB, et al. Hospital readmission for fluid and electrolyte abnormalities following ileostomy construction: preventable or unpredictable? J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(2):298–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Paquette IM, Solan P, Rafferty JF, Ferguson MA, Davis BR. Readmission for dehydration or renal failure after ileostomy creation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(8):974–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Messaris E, Sehgal R, Deiling S, et al. Dehydration is the most common indication for readmission after diverting ileostomy creation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(2):175–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Campos-Lobato LF, Alves-Ferreira PC, Oliveira PG, Sousa JB, Vogel JD. What are the risk factors for readmission in patients with an ileostomy? J Coloproctol. 2013;33(4):203–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McKenna LS, Taggart E, Stoelting J, Kirkbride G, Forbes GB. The impact of preoperative stoma marking on health-related quality of life: a comparison cohort study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2016;43(1):57–561.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Person B, Ifargan R, Lachter J, Duek SD, Kluger Y, Assalia A. The impact of preoperative stoma site marking on the incidence of complications, quality of life, and patient’s independence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(7):783–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nagle D, Pare T, Keenan E, Marcet K, Tizio S, Poylin V. Ileostomy pathway virtually eliminates readmissions for dehydration in new ostomates. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(12):1266–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Younis J, Salernoa G, Fanto D, Hadjipavlou M, Chellar D, Trickett JP. Focused preoperative patient stoma education, prior to ileostomy formation after anterior resection, contributes to a reduction in delayed discharge within the enhanced recovery programme. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27:43–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Phatak UR, Li LT, Karanjawala B, Chang GJ, Kao LS. Systematic review of educational interventions for ostomates. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(4):529–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Najjia N. Mahmoud .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mahmoud, N.N., Paulson, E.C. (2017). Quality Improvement: Preventing Readmission After Ileostomy Formation. In: Hyman, N., Umanskiy, K. (eds) Difficult Decisions in Colorectal Surgery. Difficult Decisions in Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40223-9_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40223-9_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40222-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40223-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics